Organizing for Continuous Technology Acquisition: The Role of R&D Geographic Dispersion

External technology acquisition has been proved to be an important strategy to enhance firms’ innovation performance. However, previous studies claim that companies acquiring technologies tend to not carry on with this strategy over time, thus limiting their attitude toward continuous technology acquisition. Moreover, the extant literature also highlights that this attitude is strongly influenced by their organizational structure. Therefore, in the present paper, we investigate the relationship between how firms organize R&D activities and continuous technology acquisition. Specifically, given the increasing globalization of technological development, we focus on the role of R&D geographic dispersion, and how its influence is moderated by firms’ technological diversification. We tested our hypotheses on longitudinal data of 303 biotechnology firms that acquired, at least, one USPTO patented technology over the period 1982–2012. Results reveal that R&D geographic dispersion is curvilinearly (inverted U-shaped) related to continuous technology acquisition, with negative returns occurring earlier in technology-diversified companies.

[1]  C. Benedetto,et al.  Organizing for Inbound Open Innovation: How External Consultants and a Dedicated R&D Unit Influence Product Innovation Performance† , 2016 .

[2]  Marco Ceccagnoli,et al.  The cost of integrating external technologies: Supply and demand drivers of value creation in the markets for technology , 2012 .

[3]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Acquisition Integration and Productivity Losses in the Technical Core: Disruption of Inventors in Acquired Companies , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[4]  F. Frattini,et al.  Fiat: Open Innovation in a Downturn (1993–2003) , 2010 .

[5]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy , 2000 .

[6]  Chung-Jen Chen,et al.  Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[7]  Dirk Altenwerth.  Make-and-Buy , 2012 .

[8]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of , 2022 .

[9]  Fiat: Open Innovation in a Downturn , 2010 .

[10]  A. Arora,et al.  Ideas for rent: an overview of markets for technology , 2010 .

[11]  Jill E. Perry-Smith,et al.  A Social Composition View of Team Creativity: The Role of Member Nationality-Heterogeneous Ties Outside of the Team , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[12]  María Jesús Nieto,et al.  Offshoring of R&D: Looking abroad to improve innovation performance , 2011 .

[13]  Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  Investigating the determinants of patent acquisition in biotechnology: an empirical analysis , 2015, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[14]  Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  Investigating the antecedents of general purpose technologies , 2016 .

[15]  Jasjit Singh.  Distributed R&D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output , 2006 .

[16]  María García‐Vega.  Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms , 2006 .

[17]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure† , 2014 .

[18]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[19]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Product Development and Learning in Project Teams: The Challenges Are the Benefits* , 2009 .

[20]  Marco Ceccagnoli,et al.  Productivity and the Role of Complementary Assets in Firms’ Demand for Technology Innovations , 2009 .

[21]  Joe Tidd,et al.  Organizational and technological antecedents for knowledge acquisition and learning , 1997 .

[22]  E. Huizingh.  Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .

[23]  Mark Mortensen,et al.  Constructing the Team: The Antecedents and Effects of Membership Model Divergence , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[24]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[25]  B. Silverman,et al.  R&D, ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATE TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE , 2004 .

[26]  A. Petruzzelli.  A STORY OF BREAKTHROUGH. THE CASE OF COMMON RAIL DEVELOPMENT , 2015 .

[27]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐ and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research , 2016 .

[28]  Robert Kirschbaum,et al.  Open Innovation In Practice , 2005 .

[29]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  A Chaotic Model of Innovative Search: Some Answers, Many Questions , 1997 .

[30]  R. Veugelers,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY MAKE AND BUY IN INNOVATION STRATEGIES : EVIDENCE FROM BELGIAN MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 1998 .

[31]  N. Lahiri.  Geographic Distribution of R&D Activity: How Does it Affect Innovation Quality? , 2010 .

[32]  Marco Ceccagnoli,et al.  The cost of integrating external technologies: Supply and demand drivers of value creation in the markets for technology: Overcoming Technology Integration Costs in Licensing , 2013 .

[33]  Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  Unveiling the breakthrough potential of established technologies: an empirical investigation in the aerospace industry , 2016, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[34]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions , 2008 .

[35]  Margaret Fletcher,et al.  Knowledge acquisition for the internationalization of the smaller firm: Content and sources , 2012 .

[36]  Wim Vanhaverbeke,et al.  The Interaction between Internal R&D and Different Types of External Knowledge Sourcing: An Empirical Study of Chinese Innovative Firms , 2016 .

[37]  Daniel Tzabbar,et al.  Bridging the Social Chasm in Geographically Distributed R&D Teams: The Moderating Effects of Relational Strength and Status Asymmetry on the Novelty of Team Innovation , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study , 2008 .

[39]  V. Chiesa,et al.  The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm , 2011 .

[40]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[41]  Fabrizio Cesaroni,et al.  Technological outsourcing and product diversification: do markets for technology affect firms’ strategies? , 2004 .

[42]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey , 2009 .

[43]  O. Gassmann,et al.  New concepts and trends in international R&D organization , 1999 .

[44]  A. Arora,et al.  Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology , 1994 .

[45]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  External technology acquisition and product innovativeness: The moderating roles of R&D investment and configurational context , 2011 .

[46]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  The impact of old technologies on innovation: the case of the US biotechnology industry , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[47]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  The Second Face of Appropriability: Generative Appropriability and Its Determinants , 2013 .

[48]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  A literature review on markets for ideas: Emerging characteristics and unanswered questions , 2014 .

[49]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis , 2011 .

[50]  M. Gittelman.  Does Geography Matter for Science-Based Firms? Epistemic Communities and the Geography of Research and Patenting in Biotechnology , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[51]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[52]  Andreas Bausch,et al.  The effect of context-related moderators on the internationalization-performance relationship: Evidence from meta-analysis , 2007 .

[53]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity , 2005 .

[54]  B. Cassiman,et al.  Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary? , 2016 .

[55]  Elena Pellizzoni,et al.  MOTIVATION ORIENTATIONS IN INNOVATION CONTESTS: WHY PEOPLE PARTICIPATE , 2015 .

[56]  Chinho Lin,et al.  The effect of technological diversification on organizational performance: An empirical study of S&P 500 manufacturing firms , 2015 .

[57]  Farok J. Contractor,et al.  Is international business good for companies? The evolutionary or multi-stage theory of internationalization vs. the transaction cost perspective , 2007 .

[58]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[59]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[60]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  Managing Global Innovation: Frameworks for Integrating Capabilities around the World , 2012 .

[61]  Alfredo Vittorio De Massis,et al.  Technology Acquisition in Family and Nonfamily Firms: A Longitudinal Analysis of Spanish Manufacturing Firms , 2013 .