Flaws in animal studies exploring statins and impact on meta‐analysis

Animal experiments should be appropriately designed, correctly analysed and transparently reported to increase their scientific validity and maximise the knowledge gained from each experiment. This systematic review of animal experiments investigating statins evaluates their quality of reporting and methodological aspects as well as their implications for the conduction of meta‐analyses.

[1]  S. Lazic,et al.  A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research , 2012, Nature.

[2]  M. Macleod,et al.  Preclinical studies of human disease: time to take methodological quality seriously. , 2011, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[3]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  Alex J Sutton,et al.  Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[6]  J. Ioannidis.  Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated , 2008, Epidemiology.

[7]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Reporting : The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research , 2010 .

[8]  Malcolm Macleod,et al.  How can we improve the pre-clinical development of drugs for stroke? , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals , 2009, PloS one.

[10]  Kenneth R. Hess,et al.  Statistical design considerations in animal studies published recently in cancer research. , 2011, Cancer research.

[11]  Roger M Harbord,et al.  A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  P. Turner,et al.  Administration of substances to laboratory animals: equipment considerations, vehicle selection, and solute preparation. , 2011, Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS.

[13]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[15]  Iveta Simera,et al.  Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research , 2008, BMC medicine.

[16]  Igor Sartori,et al.  Empirical Evidence of Bias. Dimensions of Methodological Quality Associated with Estimates of Treatment Effects in Controlled Trials , 1996 .

[17]  Kennon Heard,et al.  Emergency medicine animal research: does use of randomization and blinding affect the results? , 2003, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[18]  D. Redelmeier,et al.  Translation of research evidence from animals to humans. , 2006, JAMA.

[19]  Hannah R Rothstein,et al.  A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis , 2010, Research synthesis methods.

[20]  David W Howells,et al.  Pooling of Animal Experimental Data Reveals Influence of Study Design and Publication Bias , 2004, Stroke.

[21]  Joseph Beyene,et al.  Ratio of geometric means to analyze continuous outcomes in meta‐analysis: comparison to mean differences and ratio of arithmetic means using empiric data and simulation , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  D. Altman,et al.  Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies , 2008 .

[23]  C. Begley,et al.  Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research , 2012, Nature.

[24]  M. Festing,et al.  The design and statistical analysis of animal experiments. , 2002, ILAR journal.

[25]  Julian P. T. Higgins,et al.  Meta-Regression in Stata , 2008 .

[26]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  Meta-analysis of skewed data: Combining results reported on log-transformed or raw scales , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  M. Macleod,et al.  Dopamine agonists in animal models of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[28]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals. , 2002, ILAR journal.

[29]  Joseph Beyene,et al.  The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: A simulation study , 2008 .

[30]  A Whitehead,et al.  Combining summaries of binary outcomes with those of continuous outcomes in a meta-analysis. , 1999, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[31]  L. Moja,et al.  Most appropriate animal models to study the efficacy of statins: a systematic review , 2014, European journal of clinical investigation.