Concept design and Monte Carlo performance evaluation of HeadphonePET: a novel brain-dedicated PET system based on partial cylindrical detectors

Introduction: In recent years, different geometries of brain-dedicated PET scanners have been developed due to the fact that there are great emerging demands for high-quality and low-cost brain-dedicated scanners. To meet the demand, we present a novel conceptual design based on a partial cylindrical detector geometry and evaluate the performance of the designed scanner.Methods and materials: The proposed design was modeled with a ring diameter of 245 mm and axial field of view (FOV) of 277 mm, thus covering the top and sides of patient's head. Detection efficiency of our new optimized design, which we refer to as HeadphonePET, was calculated against conventional cylindrical brain PET and whole-body positron scanners. Also, in order to measure the system spatial resolution and evaluate image quality, different simulated array sources and their related projections were extracted. Finally the obtained projections were reconstructed using analytical and iterative algorithms.Results: The simulation results indicate that the normalized mean efficiency of the HeadphonePET, with 30% less used crystals, can provide 1.2% higher sensitivity with respect to conventional cylindrical brain PET. However, it was demonstrated that the HeadphonePET, due to its partial coverage nature, cannot provide better spatial resolution when using analytical reconstruction algorithms. We obtained much-improved results when we used iterative reconstruction algorithms (1.61 mm FMHM for the HeadphonePET, versus 1.16 mm FWHM for the same full-ring scanner).Conclusion: The HeadphonePET as a novel conceptual design, with about 70% number of detectors with respect to a conventional full-ring cylindrical scanner, can achieve higher detection efficiency and comparable image quality (on the level of resolution of point sources). This proposed low-cost, compact and open view design, inducing no patient fear, possesses a big potential for brain imaging for different patient positions.

[1]  J. Karp,et al.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[2]  Henning Boecker,et al.  A perspective on the future role of brain pet imaging in exercise science , 2016, NeuroImage.

[3]  Hideaki Tashima,et al.  Proposed helmet PET geometries with add-on detectors for high sensitivity brain imaging , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Jay Wu,et al.  A novel adaptive discrete cosine transform-domain filter for gap-inpainting of high resolution PET scanners. , 2014, Medical physics.

[5]  John W. Clark,et al.  Using compressive sensing to recover images from PET scanners with partial detector rings. , 2014, Medical physics.

[6]  Rik Van de Walle,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation in PET and SPECT instrumentation using GATE , 2004 .

[7]  J. S. Karp,et al.  Design Optimization of a Time-Of-Flight, Breast PET Scanner , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Yong Hyun Chung,et al.  A simulation study of a C-shaped in-beam PET system for dose verification in carbon ion therapy , 2013 .

[10]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Designing a compact high performance brain PET scanner—simulation study , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Alexander Stolin,et al.  Concept of an upright wearable positron emission tomography imager in humans , 2016, Brain and behavior.

[12]  M. Ay,et al.  Development and validation of an accurate GATE model for NeuroPET scanner. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[13]  C. Levin,et al.  Effects of system geometry and other physical factors on photon sensitivity of high-resolution positron emission tomography , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Hideaki Tashima,et al.  Investigation of the optimal detector arrangement for the helmet-chin PET - A simulation study , 2017 .

[15]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  Validation of GATE Monte Carlo simulations of the GE Advance/Discovery LS PET scanners. , 2005, Medical physics.

[16]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  STIR: Software for Tomographic Image Reconstruction Release 2 , 2006 .

[17]  Ida Häggström,et al.  Performance modeling of a wearable brain PET (BET) camera , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.