Distance Education as Strategy: How Can Your School Compete?

Student learning outcomes and attitudes dominate the distance-education debate. Competitive aspects such as price, product, institutional reputation, and market size may be equally important to the effective implementation of distance strategies. This article explores the strategic implications of distance education by examining it as a killer application and describing a typology of universities based on organizational and competitive characteristics. Porter's generic strategies are used to derive propositions detailing the most appropriate strategies for various university types. We conclude with a discussion of the negative effects of poorly conceived or implemented strategies.

[1]  Larry Downes,et al.  Unleashing the Killer App: Digital Strategies for Market Dominance , 1998 .

[2]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[3]  M. Tushman,et al.  Managing through Cycles of Technological Change , 1991 .

[4]  Cathy Owens Swift,et al.  Interactive Distance Education in Business: Is the New Technology Right for You? , 1997 .

[5]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[6]  L. S. Schulman,et al.  THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING. , 1940, Science.

[7]  E. Boyer.  A classification of institutions of higher education , 1987 .

[8]  W Kuemmerle,et al.  Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[9]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Organizational Change and Organizational Mortality. , 1986 .

[10]  Richard E. Yellen,et al.  Distant Learning Students: A Comparison with Traditional Studies , 1998 .

[11]  M. Feldman,et al.  Electronic Mail and Organizational Communication: Does Saying Hi Really Matter? , 1998 .

[12]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[13]  R. J. House,et al.  Organizations: A Quantum View , 1984 .

[14]  E M Hallowell,et al.  The human moment at work. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[15]  Mike Moore.  Editorial: Take time to design , 1992 .

[16]  J. Webster,et al.  Teaching Effectiveness in Technology-Mediated Distance Learning , 1997 .

[17]  Heather A. Haveman.  Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation , 1992 .

[18]  Watson Scott Swail,et al.  The Virtual University & Educational Opportunity. Issues of Equity and Access for the Next Generation. Policy Perspectives. , 1999 .

[19]  John Daniel,et al.  Why Universities Need Technology Strategies , 1997 .

[20]  Robert X. Cringely.  Accidental empires: how the boys of Silicon Valley make their millions, battle foreign competition, and still can't get a date , 1992 .

[21]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance. , 1980 .

[22]  P. Wright.  A refinement of Porter's strategies , 1987 .

[23]  Mark Bullen,et al.  What’s the Difference: A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education by Ronald Phipps and Jamie Merisotis , 1999 .