A Review of Current “Noise Reduction” Hearing Aids: Rationale, Assumptions, and Efficacy

Amplification technology has changed considerably in the last decade, particularly with the introduction of more advanced adaptive signal processing approaches and digital/hybrid hearing aids. Because difficulty understanding speech in the presence of background noise is the most common complaint of hearing-impaired patients, an increasing number of these new products are being marketed as “noise reduction” hearing aids. There remain, however, many unanswered questions regarding patient candidacy for these instruments, and the relative benefit that can be expected from the new technology. This article discusses issues and assumptions underlying noise reduction strategies, reviews categories of hearing aids on the market that are meant to alleviate listening difficulty in noise, and outlines future needs in research and development in this area.

[1]  W J Staab Digital/programmable hearing aids--an eye towards the future. , 1990, British journal of audiology.

[2]  F K Kuk,et al.  The effects of "noise suppression" hearing aids on consonant recognition in speech-babble and low-frequency noise. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[3]  T L Wiley,et al.  Frequency selectivity and consonant intelligibility in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  J. M. Pickett,et al.  Some Masking Effects Produced by Low-Frequency Vowel Formants in Persons with Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 1975 .

[5]  M W Skinner,et al.  Speech intelligibility in noise-induced hearing loss: effects of high-frequency compensation. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J L Punch,et al.  Relative effects of low-frequency amplification on syllable recognition and speech quality. , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[7]  D D Dirks,et al.  Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  S Mangold,et al.  Programmable hearing aid with multichannel compression. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology.

[9]  M J Osberger,et al.  Discrimination of formant frequency transitions in synthetic vowels. , 1973, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  R. Lippmann,et al.  Study of multichannel amplitude compression and linear amplification for persons with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  E Villchur,et al.  Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D A Fabry,et al.  Masked and filtered simulation of hearing loss: effects on consonant recognition. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  D D Dirks,et al.  Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  A. Duquesnoy The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  B E Walden,et al.  Multidimensional scaling of quality judgments of speech signals processed by hearing aids. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  L E Humes,et al.  Modeling sensorineural hearing loss. I. Model and retrospective evaluation. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J M Pickett,et al.  Sensorineural hearing loss and upward spread of masking. , 1970, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  J C Cooper,et al.  Speech discrimination in noise. , 1971, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  L K Stein,et al.  Listener‐Assessed Intelligibility of a Hearing Aid Self‐Adaptive Noise Filter , 1984, Ear and hearing.

[21]  C M Reed,et al.  Hearing aids--a review of past research on linear amplification, amplitude compression, and frequency lowering. , 1979, ASHA monographs.

[22]  A J Klein Assessing speech recognition in noise for listeners with a signal processor hearing aid. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[23]  D J Schum Noise reduction strategies for elderly, hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[24]  S. Gordon-Salant Effects of reducing low-frequency amplification on consonant perception in quiet and noise. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[25]  E. Robert Libby Faith in natural systems , 1991 .

[26]  D D Dirks,et al.  Application of the Articulation Index and the Speech Transmission Index to the recognition of speech by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Relation between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. I. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  C. Turner,et al.  Spread of masking in normal subjects and in subjects with high-frequency hearing loss. , 1986, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[29]  Schum Dj Noise reduction strategies for elderly, hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990 .

[30]  F K Kuk,et al.  Relationship between consonant recognition and subjective ratings of hearing aids. , 1990, British journal of audiology.

[31]  D D Dirks,et al.  A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[32]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. , 1983, British journal of audiology.

[33]  B. Moore,et al.  Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[34]  J. Gagné,et al.  Excess masking among listeners with a sensorineural hearing loss. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Irwin Pollack,et al.  Effects of High Pass and Low Pass Filtering on the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise , 1948 .

[36]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Speech perception ability and psychophysical tuning curves in hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Carol A. Sammeth Current Availability of Digital and Hybrid Hearing Aids , 1990 .

[38]  R S Abramovitz,et al.  Frequency shaping and multiband compression in hearing aids. , 1980, Journal of communication disorders.

[39]  M P Haggard,et al.  Two-state compression of spectral tilt: individual differences and psychoacoustical limitations to the benefit from compression. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[40]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  J. Pickett,et al.  Some rehabilitative considerations for future speech-processing hearing aids. , 1986, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[42]  D Byrne,et al.  The effects of multichannel compression/expansion amplification on the intelligibility of nonsense syllables in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  H. Dillon,et al.  Compression in hearing aids: an analysis, a review and some recommendations , 1981 .

[44]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  D D Dirks,et al.  Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  J. Dubno,et al.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  D D Dirks,et al.  Some effects of spectral shaping on recognition of speech by hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  D Graupe,et al.  A single-microphone-based self-adaptive filter of noise from speech and its performance evaluation. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[49]  I V Nábĕlek Performance of hearing-impaired listeners under various types of amplitude compression. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  P. A. Yantis,et al.  The effect of automatic gain control in hearing-impaired listeners with different dynamic ranges. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[51]  David Preves,et al.  Approaches to Noise Reduction in Analog, Digital, and Hybrid Hearing Aids , 1990 .

[52]  D A Preves,et al.  Hearing aid saturation and aided loudness discomfort. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[53]  L E Humes,et al.  Understanding the speech-understanding problems of the hearing impaired. , 1991, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[54]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[55]  P M Zurek,et al.  Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  M F Dorman,et al.  Susceptibility to intraspeech spread of masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  R Plomp,et al.  The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  D A Fabry,et al.  Effects of an adaptive filter hearing aid on speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired subjects. , 1988, Ear and hearing.

[60]  J. Barfod Speech perception processes and fitting of hearing aids. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[61]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Consonant recognition in quiet and in noise with aging among normal hearing listeners. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Evaluating efficacy. , 1980, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[63]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.