Effectiveness of monetary incentives for recruiting adolescents to an intervention trial to reduce smoking.

BACKGROUND The study objective is to evaluate the effect of monetary incentives on response rates of adolescents to a smoking-related survey as the first step toward participation in an intervention trial. METHODS A sample of 4,200 adolescent members of a managed care organization were randomized to one of four incentive groups: a $2 cash group, a $15 cash group, a $200 prize drawing group, or a no-incentive group. We compared group-specific response rates and willingness to be contacted about future study activities, as well as costs. RESULTS Incentives increased survey response rates (55% response without incentive vs. a 69% response with incentive), with response of 74% in the $15 cash group, 69% in the token group, and 63% with a prize incentive. Incentives did not adversely affect willingness of adolescents to be contacted about a smoking intervention, (65% willing with incentives vs. 60% without, P = 0.03). In terms of cost per additional survey completed, token and prize groups were marginally more expensive than the no-incentive group ($0.40 and $1.42, respectively) while the large cash incentive was substantially more costly ($11.37). CONCLUSIONS Monetary incentives improve response rates to a mailed survey, without adverse impact on willingness to further participate in intervention activities. However, a variety of issues must be considered when using incentives for recruitment to intervention studies.

[1]  K. Helzlsouer,et al.  Controlled trial of the effect of length, incentives, and follow-up techniques on response to a mailed questionnaire. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  S. Hursh,et al.  Tradeoffs in choice between risk and delay depend on monetary amounts. , 1998, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  M. Hovell,et al.  Tracking and follow-up of 16,915 adolescents: minimizing attrition bias. , 1997, Controlled clinical trials.

[4]  Kathleen Mcspurren,et al.  CHARITIES, NO; LOTTERIES, NO; CASH, YES MAIN EFFECTS AND INTERACTIONS IN A CANADIAN INCENTIVES EXPERIMENT , 1996 .

[5]  D A Asch,et al.  Timing payments to subjects of mail surveys: cost-effectiveness and bias. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  B. Flay,et al.  Developing School-Based Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation Programs , 1994 .

[7]  E. John,et al.  Effect of a monetary incentive on response to a mail survey. , 1994, Annals of epidemiology.

[8]  T V Perneger,et al.  Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey. , 1993, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  S R Hursh,et al.  Behavioral economics of drug self-administration: an introduction. , 1993, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[10]  A. H. Church ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES: A META-ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[11]  J. Hopp,et al.  The Impact of Incentives and Competitions on Participation and Quit Rates in Worksite Smoking Cessation Programs , 1993, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[12]  L. Dodds,et al.  The effect on response rates of offering a small incentive with a mailed questionnaire. , 1992, Annals of epidemiology.

[13]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Understanding mail survey response behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1991 .

[14]  K. Glanz,et al.  Health behavior and health education : theory, research, and practice , 1991 .

[15]  R. Luepker,et al.  Gender differences in cigarette smoking and quitting in a cohort of young adults. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[16]  Alicia A. Nelson,et al.  A Systematic Effort to Reduce Smoking at the Worksite , 1990, Health education quarterly.

[17]  J. Sallis,et al.  Competition/cooperation in worksite smoking cessation using nicotine gum. , 1989, Preventive medicine.

[18]  J. Elder,et al.  Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  R. Hubbard,et al.  PROMISED CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITY AND MAIL SURVEY RESPONSES REPLICATION WITH EXTENSION , 1988 .

[20]  A. Cartwright Who responds to postal questionnaires? , 1986, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[21]  R. Glasgow,et al.  A worksite smoking modification competition: potential for public health impact. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[22]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[23]  K. Sheikh,et al.  Investigating non-response bias in mail surveys. , 1981, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[24]  H. Adami,et al.  Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[25]  Leonard H. Epstein,et al.  Developmental aspects of health compliance behavior , 1993 .

[26]  S. Blair,et al.  Patterns of non-response to a mail survey. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.