First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III, randomized, open-label, ENSURE study.

BACKGROUND The phase III, randomized, open-label ENSURE study (NCT01342965) evaluated first-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GP) in patients from China, Malaysia and the Philippines with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients ≥18 years old with histologically/cytologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 were randomized 1:1 to receive erlotinib (oral; 150 mg once daily until progression/unacceptable toxicity) or GP [G 1250 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1 and 8 (3-weekly cycle); P 75 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1, (3-weekly cycle) for up to four cycles]. Primary end point: investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Other end points include objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS A total of 217 patients were randomized: 110 to erlotinib and 107 to GP. Investigator-assessed median PFS was 11.0 months versus 5.5 months, erlotinib versus GP, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.51; log-rank P < 0.0001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed median PFS was consistent (HR, 0.42). Median OS was 26.3 versus 25.5 months, erlotinib versus GP, respectively (HR, 0.91, 95% CI 0.63-1.31; log-rank P = .607). ORR was 62.7% for erlotinib and 33.6% for GP. Treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 2.7% versus 10.6% of erlotinib and GP patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were rash (6.4%) with erlotinib, and neutropenia (25.0%), leukopenia (14.4%), and anemia (12.5%) with GP. CONCLUSION These analyses demonstrate that first-line erlotinib provides a statistically significant improvement in PFS versus GP in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (NCT01342965).

[1]  T. Mok,et al.  Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  E. Felip,et al.  The Impact of EGFR T790M Mutations and BIM mRNA Expression on Outcome in Patients with EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Treated with Erlotinib or Chemotherapy in the Randomized Phase III EURTAC Trial , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  M. Meyerson,et al.  Exon 19 Deletion Mutations of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Are Associated with Prolonged Survival in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Gefitinib or Erlotinib , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  J. Minna,et al.  Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2013 , 2013, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  R. Mantovani,et al.  EGFR through STAT3 modulates ΔN63α expression to sustain tumor‐initiating cell proliferation in squamous cell carcinomas , 2013, Journal of cellular physiology.

[7]  Hui Li,et al.  Efficacy of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with/without EGFR-Mutation: Evidence Based on Recent Phase III Randomized Trials , 2014, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[8]  L. Sequist,et al.  Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  T. Mok,et al.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations and Their Correlation with Gefitinib Therapy in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on Updated Individual Patient Data from Six Medical Centers in Mainland China , 2007, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[10]  Lin Huan,et al.  Screening for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Cancer , 2010 .

[11]  Chun-Ming Tsai,et al.  Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  T. Mok,et al.  Better survival with EGFR exon 19 than exon 21 mutations in gefitinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients is due to differential inhibition of downstream signals. , 2008, Cancer letters.

[13]  A. Gemma,et al.  F1000 highlights , 2010 .

[14]  Renato Martins,et al.  Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  K. Goto,et al.  A prospective, phase II, open-label study (JO22903) of first-line erlotinib in Japanese patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2013, Lung cancer.

[16]  Yi-long Wu,et al.  Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  Jun Ma,et al.  Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  E. Felip,et al.  Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[19]  H. Hansen,et al.  Lung cancer. , 1990, Cancer chemotherapy and biological response modifiers.