Comparing Meaning in Language and Cognition : P-Hyponymy , Concept Combination , Asymmetric Similarity Candidate

In this dissertation we work in the framework of compositional distributional models of meaning to examine a number of asymmetric linguistic phenomena that manifest themselves in language and cognition. These include overextension with respect to concept combination, asymmetry of similarity judgment and hyponymy and typicality. In particular, we make use of the formalism of density matrices, which were recently introduced as an alternative to the vector-based model of word meaning. We first consider the former two of the above-mentioned phenomena using only tools that have been developed so far in the distributional compositional model. We then proceed to define a new quantitative asymmetric measure on density matrices, called p-hyponymy, which allows us to determine the strength of hyponymy in hyponym-hypernym pairs. We show how this can be lifted to the level of the sentence structures that our mathematical model of meaning supports and consider the implications of this result. We conclude with a brief discussion of how this measure can potentially be modified to account for other similar phenomena.

[1]  Dimitri Kartsaklis,et al.  Open System Categorical Quantum Semantics in Natural Language Processing , 2015, CALCO.

[2]  B. Coecke,et al.  Categories for the practising physicist , 2009, 0905.3010.

[3]  J. R. Firth,et al.  A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930-1955 , 1957 .

[4]  Stephen Clark,et al.  The Frobenius anatomy of word meanings II: possessive relative pronouns , 2014, J. Log. Comput..

[5]  Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh,et al.  A Compositional Distributional Semantics, Two Concrete Constructions, and Some Experimental Evaluations , 2011, QI.

[6]  Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh,et al.  Experimental Support for a Categorical Compositional Distributional Model of Meaning , 2011, EMNLP.

[7]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[8]  Aleks Kissinger,et al.  Picturing Quantum Processes by Bob Coecke , 2017 .

[9]  J. Hampton Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts , 1981, Cognition.

[11]  C. A. Bean,et al.  The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective , 2002 .

[12]  Peter Selinger,et al.  Dagger Compact Closed Categories and Completely Positive Maps: (Extended Abstract) , 2007, QPL.

[13]  Esma Balkr,et al.  Using Density Matrices in a Compositional Distributional Model of Meaning , 2014 .

[14]  Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh,et al.  Experimenting with transitive verbs in a DisCoCat , 2011, GEMS.

[15]  Stephen Clark,et al.  Combining Symbolic and Distributional Models of Meaning , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Quantum Interaction.

[16]  Stephen Clark,et al.  The Frobenius anatomy of word meanings I: subject and object relative pronouns , 2013, J. Log. Comput..

[17]  Stephen Clark,et al.  Concrete Sentence Spaces for Compositional Distributional Models of Meaning , 2010, IWCS.

[18]  Joe Pater The harmonic mind : from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar , 2009 .

[19]  Michael Barr,et al.  Category theory for computing science , 1995, Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science.

[20]  S. Lane Categories for the Working Mathematician , 1971 .

[21]  J. Hampton Overextension of Conjunctive Concepts: Evidence for a Unitary Model of Concept Typicality and Class Inclusion , 1988 .

[22]  J. Hampton,et al.  Disjunction of natural concepts , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Dimitri Kartsaklis,et al.  Reasoning about Meaning in Natural Language with Compact Closed Categories and Frobenius Algebras , 2014, ArXiv.

[24]  Stephen Clark,et al.  Mathematical Foundations for a Compositional Distributional Model of Meaning , 2010, ArXiv.

[25]  Joachim Kock,et al.  Frobenius Algebras and 2-D Topological Quantum Field Theories , 2004 .

[26]  Robin Piedeleu,et al.  Ambiguity in Categorical Models of Meaning , 2014 .

[27]  Edward Grefenstette,et al.  Category-theoretic quantitative compositional distributional models of natural language semantics , 2013, ArXiv.

[28]  Joachim Lambek,et al.  Type Grammar Revisited , 1997, LACL.

[29]  J. Lambek The Mathematics of Sentence Structure , 1958 .

[30]  P. Selinger A Survey of Graphical Languages for Monoidal Categories , 2009, 0908.3347.

[31]  Martha Lewis,et al.  A Compositional Explanation of the 'Pet Fish' Phenomenon , 2015, QI.

[32]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  Introduction to Categories and Categorical Logic , 2011, ArXiv.