Analysis of volume overestimation artifacts in the breast outline segmentation in tomosynthesis

In digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), the reconstruction is calculated from x-ray projection images acquired over a small range of angles. One step in the reconstruction process is to identify the pixels that fall outside the shadow of the breast, to segment the breast from the background (air). In each projection, rays are back-projected from these pixels to the focal spot. All voxels along these rays are identified as air. By combining these results over all projections, a breast outline can be determined for the reconstruction. This paper quantifies the accuracy of this breast segmentation strategy in DBT. In this study, a physical phantom modeling a breast under compression was analyzed with a prototype next-generation tomosynthesis (NGT) system described in previous work. Multiple wires were wrapped around the phantom. Since the wires are thin and high contrast, their exact location can be determined from the reconstruction. Breast parenchyma was portrayed outside the outline defined by the wires. Specifically, the size of the phantom was overestimated along the posteroanterior (PA) direction; i.e., perpendicular to the plane of conventional source motion. To analyze how the acquisition geometry affects the accuracy of the breast outline segmentation, a computational phantom was also simulated. The simulation identified two ways to improve the segmentation accuracy; either by increasing the angular range of source motion laterally or by increasing the range in the PA direction. The latter approach is a unique feature of the NGT design; the advantage of this approach was validated with our prototype system.

[1]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  An alternate design for the Defrise phantom to quantify resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[2]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: inherent spatial resolution. , 1995, Medical physics.

[3]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Optimizing the acquisition geometry for digital breast tomosynthesis using the Defrise phantom , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[5]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Comparing the imaging performance of computed super resolution and magnification tomosynthesis , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Heang-Ping Chan,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views. , 2014, Radiology.

[7]  A. Maidment,et al.  Optimization of phosphor-based detector design for oblique x-ray incidence in digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2011, Medical physics.

[8]  Ian A. Cunningham,et al.  Penalty on the detective quantum efficiency from off-axis incident x rays , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Calculation of OTF, NPS, and DQE for Oblique X-Ray Incidence on Turbid Granular Phosphors , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[10]  A. Badano,et al.  Oblique incidence effects in direct x-ray detectors: a first-order approximation using a physics-based analytical model. , 2011, Medical physics.

[11]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Erratum: “A fast, angle-dependent, analytical model of CsI detector response for optimization of 3D x-ray breast imaging systems” [Med. Phys. 37, 2593–2605 (2010)]† , 2011 .

[12]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Optimization of Tomosynthesis Acquisition Parameters: Angular Range and Number of Projections , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[13]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Dynamic reconstruction and rendering of 3D tomosynthesis images , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[14]  A. Badano,et al.  A fast, angle-dependent, analytical model of CsI detector response for optimization of 3D x-ray breast imaging systems. , 2010, Medical physics.

[15]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  The compressed breast during mammography and breast tomosynthesis: in vivo shape characterization and modeling , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Michael P. Kempston,et al.  Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.