Corporate decision-making in R&D outsourcing and the impact on internal R&D employment intensity

This article aims to assess whether firms' strategies of R&D outsourcing determine changes in their internal R&D employment intensity. Four strategic decisions are investigated: to start, increase, decrease or stop outsourcing. It is found that internal R&D employment intensity decreases when firms decide to start, to increase, or to stop R&D outsourcing. However, this finding hides important differences according to the type and the location of the contractor. In general, firms prefer a mix of different types of contractors at different locations. Started outsourcing of R&D to research centers within the nation and increased R&D outsourcing to research centers within the region appear to decrease the internal R&D employment intensity. Decreasing outsourcing to national universities in another region also has a negative impact on internal R&D employment intensity. A corporate decision to stop R&D outsourcing to other firms within the nation but outside the region has a positive impact on the internal R&D employment intensity. The latter is the only effect that is not only statistically significant but is also substantial in magnitude. Copyright 2010 The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

[1]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[2]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[3]  R. Camagni.  Innovation Networks , 1991 .

[4]  Werner Bönte,et al.  R&D and productivity: Internal vs. external R&D - evidence from west german manufacturing industries , 2003 .

[5]  E. Bohlin,et al.  External Technology Acquisition in Large Multi-Technology Corporations , 1992 .

[6]  Shreefal S. Mehta,et al.  Outsourcing A Core Competency , 2007 .

[7]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[8]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  The Firm as an Incentive System , 1994 .

[9]  Han Hendriks,et al.  Make, buy or ally , 2008 .

[10]  G. Gereffi,et al.  The governance of global value chains , 2005 .

[11]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Knowledge Specialisation and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More Than They Do? , 2001 .

[12]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation between Firms and Universities: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing , 2003 .

[13]  P. Beneito.  The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models , 2006 .

[14]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[15]  Enrico Santarelli,et al.  The Skill Bias Effect of Technological and Organisational Change: Evidence and Policy Implications , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[17]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[18]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Incomplete Contracts and the Product Cycle , 2005 .

[19]  Roberto Camagni,et al.  Innovation Networks , 1991 .

[20]  B. Tether.  Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis , 2002 .

[21]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[22]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[23]  K. Scott Swan,et al.  A Product and Process Model of the Technology-Sourcing Decision , 2003 .

[24]  Khaleel Malik,et al.  Sourcing external technological knowledge: a decision support framework for firms , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[25]  William H. Davidson,et al.  International Technology Transactions and the Theory of the Firm , 1984 .

[26]  R. Veugelers,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY MAKE AND BUY IN INNOVATION STRATEGIES : EVIDENCE FROM BELGIAN MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 1998 .

[27]  S. Schwartz.  A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work , 1999 .

[28]  A. Morrison,et al.  Innovation and the geographical and functional dimensions of outsourcing: An empirical investigation based on Italian firm level data , 2007 .

[29]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[30]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[31]  Stephan Billinger,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Designing the Boundaries of the Firm: From "Make, Buy, or Ally" to the Dynamic Benefits of Vertical Architecture , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[32]  M. Tushman,et al.  Managing Strategic Innovation and Change: A Collection of Readings , 1996 .

[33]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[34]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[35]  Wojciech W. Charemza,et al.  New Directions in Econometric Practice: General to Specific Modelling, Cointegration and Vector Autoregression , 1991 .

[36]  M. Pianta.  The impact of innovation on jobs, skills and wages , 2004 .

[37]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[38]  N. Rosenberg.  Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .

[39]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[40]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance , 2004 .

[41]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[42]  J. Howells.  Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography , 2002 .

[43]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[44]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[45]  Marco Vivarelli,et al.  Internal and External R&D: A Sample Selection Approach , 2004 .

[46]  Y. Aharoni.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1992 .

[47]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Outsourcing innovation the new engine of growth , 2000 .

[48]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[49]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[50]  A. Rasheed,et al.  Making More by Doing Less: An Analysis of Outsourcing and its Effects on Firm Performance , 2000 .

[51]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[52]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[53]  R. Wilson,et al.  The Effect of Technological Environment and Product Rivalry on R&D Effort and Licensing of Inventions , 1977 .

[54]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[55]  B. Cassiman,et al.  Organizing for Innovation: R&D Projects, Activities and Partners , 2006 .

[56]  R. Veugelers.  Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing , 1997 .

[57]  M. Mol,et al.  Does Being R&D Intensive Still Discourage Outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing , 2005 .

[58]  Daniel Trefler,et al.  Offshoring: Threats and Opportunities , 2005 .

[59]  Jakob Edler,et al.  Changes in the Strategic Management of Technology: Results of a Global Benchmarking Study , 2002 .

[60]  D. Audretsch,et al.  The decision between internal and external R&D , 1996 .

[61]  A. Tiwana,et al.  Does peripheral knowledge complement control? An empirical test in technology outsourcing alliances , 2007 .

[62]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Outsourcing in the innovation process: Locational and strategic determinants , 2001 .

[63]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[64]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Choosing Between Internal and Non-internal R&D Activities: Some Technological and Economic Factors , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[65]  Khaleel Malik,et al.  The Growth and Management of R&D Outsourcing: Evidence from UK Pharmaceuticals , 2008 .

[66]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizing for Innovation , 1986 .

[67]  Mark Harvey,et al.  Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation , 2003 .

[68]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[69]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Technology Transfer to Overseas Subsidiaries by U. S.-Based Firms , 1980 .

[70]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[71]  Boris Lokshin,et al.  The Productivity Effects of Internal and External R&D: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model , 2008 .

[72]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[73]  M. Carree,et al.  Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies , 2004 .

[74]  A. Spithoven,et al.  The Spatial Organization of Innovation: Open Innovation, External Knowledge Relations and Urban Structure , 2008 .

[75]  Rod.  Core competencies and the strategic management of R & D , 2006 .

[76]  Charles F. Larson.  50 Years of Change in Industrial Research and Technology Management , 2007 .

[77]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Tilburg University Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance Wuyts , 2005 .