Imaging prior information in the brain

In making sense of the visual world, the brain's processing is driven by two factors: the physical information provided by the eyes (“bottom-up” data) and the expectancies driven by past experience (“top-down” influences). We use degraded stimuli to tease apart the effects of bottom-up and top-down processes because they are easier to recognize with prior knowledge of undegraded images. Using machine learning algorithms, we quantify the amount of information that brain regions contain about stimuli as the subject learns the coherent images. Our results show that several distinct regions, including high-level visual areas and the retinotopic cortex, contain more information about degraded stimuli with prior knowledge. Critically, these regions are separate from those that exhibit classical priming, indicating that top-down influences are more than feature-based attention. Together, our results show how the neural processing of complex imagery is rapidly influenced by fleeting experiences.

[1]  A. Dale,et al.  High‐resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[2]  B. Motter Neural correlates of attentive selection for color or luminance in extrastriate area V4 , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4 , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Geoffrey M Boynton,et al.  Imaging orientation selectivity: decoding conscious perception in V1 , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context , 1997, Nature.

[6]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article Pymvpa: a Unifying Approach to the Analysis of Neuroscientifi C Data , 2022 .

[7]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Yasuhito Sawahata,et al.  Spatial smoothing hurts localization but not information: Pitfalls for brain mappers , 2010, NeuroImage.

[9]  Nikos Makris,et al.  Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  Jascha D. Swisher,et al.  Multiscale Pattern Analysis of Orientation-Selective Activity in the Primary Visual Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[12]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[13]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[14]  Yuko Y Palesch,et al.  Analysis of clustered matched-pair data for a non-inferiority study design. , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  David D. Cox,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[17]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  The effects of visual object priming on brain activation before and after recognition , 2000, Current Biology.

[20]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  Attentive tracking of objects vs. substances , 2010 .

[21]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Recognition alters the spatial pattern of FMRI activation in early retinotopic cortex. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Priming Visual Face-Processing Mechanisms: Electrophysiological Evidence , 2002, Psychological science.

[23]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[26]  R. Hess,et al.  What causes non-monotonic tuning of fMRI response to noisy images? , 2002, Current Biology.

[27]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[28]  G. Rees,et al.  Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attention to both space and feature modulates neuronal responses in macaque area V4. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Makio Kashino,et al.  Phonemic restoration : The brain creates missing speech sounds , 2006 .

[31]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Dynamics of visual recognition revealed by fMRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[32]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[33]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[34]  S. Treue,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Increases the Selectivity of Population Responses in Primate Visual Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.

[35]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  Large Scale Multiple Kernel Learning , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[36]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Support vector machines for temporal classification of block design fMRI data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[37]  R. Savoy Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) , 2002 .

[38]  R. Gregory The intelligent eye , 1970 .

[39]  C. M. Mooney Age in the development of closure ability in children. , 1957, Canadian journal of psychology.

[40]  Hans P. Op de Beeck,et al.  Against hyperacuity in brain reading: Spatial smoothing does not hurt multivariate fMRI analyses? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[41]  B. Fischer,et al.  Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[42]  S. Bentin,et al.  Meaningful processing of meaningless stimuli: The influence of perceptual experience on early visual processing of faces , 2002, Cognition.

[43]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  PyMVPA: a Python Toolbox for Multivariate Pattern Analysis of fMRI Data , 2009, Neuroinformatics.

[44]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Push-pull mechanism of selective attention in human extrastriate cortex. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  P. H. Schiller,et al.  State dependent activity in monkey visual cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.