Ranking general circulation models for India using TOPSIS

Eleven general circulation models/global climate models (GCMs) - BCCR-BCCM2.0, INGV-ECHAM4, GFDL2.0, GFDL2.1, GISS, IPSL-CM4, MIROC3, MRI-CGCM2, NCAR-PCMI, UKMO-HADCM3 and UKMO-HADGEM1 - are evaluated for Indian climate conditions using the performance indicator, skill score (SS). Two climate variables, temperature T (at three levels, i.e. 500, 700, 850 mb) and precipitation rate (Pr) are considered resulting in four SS-based evaluation criteria (T500, T700, T850, Pr). The multicriterion decision-making method, technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution, is applied to rank 11 GCMs. Efforts are made to rank GCMs for the Upper Malaprabha catchment and two river basins, namely, Krishna and Mahanadi (covered by 17 and 15 grids of size 2.5 degrees x 2.5 degrees, respectively). Similar efforts are also made for India (covered by 73 grid points of size 2.5 degrees x 2.5 degrees) for which an ensemble of GFDL2.0, INGV-ECHAM4, UKMO-HADCM3, MIROC3, BCCR-BCCM2.0 and GFDL2.1 is found to be suitable. It is concluded that the proposed methodology can be applied to similar situations with ease.

[1]  B. Santer,et al.  Selecting global climate models for regional climate change studies , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  Measurement of GCM Skill in Predicting Variables Relevant for Hydroclimatological Assessments , 2009 .

[3]  Jaclyn N. Brown,et al.  Assessment of the CMIP5 global climate model simulations of the western tropical Pacific climate system and comparison to CMIP3 , 2014 .

[4]  E. Guilyardi,et al.  UNDERSTANDING EL NINO IN OCEAN-ATMOSPHERE GENERAL CIRCULATION MODELS : Progress and Challenges , 2008 .

[5]  B. Hewitson,et al.  Good Practice Guidance Paper on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections , 2010 .

[6]  D. Kumar,et al.  Assessing GCM Convergence for India Using the Variable Convergence Score , 2014 .

[7]  Andrew J. Pitman,et al.  Ranking the AR4 climate models over the Murray‐Darling Basin using simulated maximum temperature, minimum temperature and precipitation , 2008 .

[8]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[9]  I. Smith,et al.  Document and assess methods for generating inputs to hydrological models and extend delivery of projections across Victoria , 2010 .

[10]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  A. Pitman,et al.  Systematic differences in future 20 year temperature extremes in AR4 model projections over Australia as a function of model skill , 2013 .

[12]  A. Pitman,et al.  Ranking climate models by performance using actual values and anomalies: Implications for climate change impact assessments , 2010 .

[13]  D. Nagesh Kumar,et al.  Multicriterion Analysis in Engineering and Management , 2010 .

[14]  S. Charles,et al.  A score‐based method for assessing the performance of GCMs: A case study of southeastern Australia , 2013 .

[15]  R. Wilby,et al.  A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low‐flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK , 2006 .

[16]  Subimal Ghosh,et al.  Modeling GCM and scenario uncertainty using a possibilistic approach: Application to the Mahanadi River, India , 2008 .

[17]  Tung Xuan Bui,et al.  Co-oP: A Group Decision Support System for Cooperative Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making , 1987 .

[18]  Andrew J. Pitman,et al.  Do weak AR4 models bias projections of future climate changes over Australia? , 2009 .

[19]  P. Whetton,et al.  Australian climate change projections derived from simulations performed for the IPCC 4th Assessment Report , 2007 .

[20]  D. Hughes,et al.  An assessment of the skill of downscaled GCM outputs in simulating historical patterns of rainfall variability in South Africa , 2014 .

[21]  F. Su,et al.  Evaluation of the Global Climate Models in the CMIP5 over the Tibetan Plateau , 2013 .

[22]  A. Pitman,et al.  An Assessment of GCM Skill in Simulating Persistence across Multiple Time Scales , 2011 .

[23]  A. Pitman,et al.  Evaluation of the AR4 Climate Models’ Simulated Daily Maximum Temperature, Minimum Temperature, and Precipitation over Australia Using Probability Density Functions , 2007 .

[24]  Scott A. Sisson,et al.  Smaller projected increases in 20‐year temperature returns over Australia in skill‐selected climate models , 2009 .

[25]  Charles Doutriaux,et al.  Performance metrics for climate models , 2008 .

[26]  D. Pierson,et al.  AR4 climate model performance in simulating snow water equivalent over Catskill Mountain watersheds, New York, USA , 2011 .

[27]  Barry W. Brook,et al.  Multi‐model climate projections for biodiversity risk assessments , 2011 .