Female butterflies prefer males bearing bright iridescent ornamentation

Butterflies are among nature's most colourful animals, and provide a living showcase for how extremely bright, chromatic and iridescent coloration can be generated by complex optical mechanisms. The gross characteristics of male butterfly colour patterns are understood to function for species and/or sex recognition, but it is not known whether female mate choice promotes visual exaggeration of this coloration. Here I show that females of the sexually dichromatic species Hypolimnas bolina prefer conspecific males that possess bright iridescent blue/ultraviolet dorsal ornamentation. In separate field and enclosure experiments, using both dramatic and graded wing colour manipulations, I demonstrate that a moderate qualitative reduction in signal brightness and chromaticity has the same consequences as removing the signal entirely. These findings validate a long-held hypothesis, and argue for the importance of intra- versus interspecific selection as the driving force behind the exaggeration of bright, iridescent butterfly colour patterns.

[1]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Plumage colour in nestling blue tits: sexual dichromatism, condition dependence and genetic effects , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  S. Fitzpatrick Colour schemes for birds: structural coloration and signals of quality in feathers , 1998 .

[3]  G. O. Stride Further studies on the courtship behaviour of african mimetic butterflies , 1958 .

[4]  H. Bates,et al.  XXXII. Contributions to an Insect Fauna of the Amazon Valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidæ. , 1862 .

[5]  P. Pye-Smith The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[6]  Peter Vukusic,et al.  Stress-mediated covariance between nano-structural architecture and ultraviolet butterfly coloration , 2006 .

[7]  O. Taylor,et al.  Ultraviolet reflection and its behavioral role in the courtship of the sulfur butterflies Colias eurytheme and C. philodice (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  R E Michod,et al.  Ecological genetics. , 1981, Science.

[9]  D. Kemp The ecology of female receptivity in the territorial butterfly Hypolimnas bolina (L.) (Nymphalidae): implications for mate location by males , 2001 .

[10]  D. Wiernasz FEMALE CHOICE AND SEXUAL SELECTION OF MALE WING MELANIN PATTERN IN PIERIS OCCIDENTALIS (LEPIDOPTERA) , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  H. Bates,et al.  Contributions to an Insect Fauna of the Amazon Valley.—Lepidoptera:—Heliconinæ. , 1862 .

[12]  G. Hill,et al.  Nanostructure predicts intraspecific variation in ultraviolet–blue plumage colour† , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  D. Kemp,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity in field populations of the tropical butterfly Hypolimnas bolina (L.) (Nymphalidae) , 2001 .

[14]  A. Wallace Darwinism : an exposition of the theory of natural selection, with some of its applications / by Alfred Russel Wallace. , 1889 .

[15]  References , 1971 .

[16]  J. Mappes,et al.  Ultraviolet reflection and predation risk in diurnal and nocturnal Lepidoptera , 2004 .

[17]  D. Kemp,et al.  CONDITION DEPENDENCE, QUANTITATIVE GENETICS, AND THE POTENTIAL SIGNAL CONTENT OF IRIDESCENT ULTRAVIOLET BUTTERFLY COLORATION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  P. Vukusic,et al.  Directionally Controlled Fluorescence Emission in Butterflies , 2005, Science.

[19]  J. Turner Why male butterflies are non-mimetic: natural selection, sexual selection, group selection, modification and sieving* , 1978 .

[20]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[21]  H. Bates XIX. Contributions to an Insect Fauna of the Amazon Valley , 2009 .

[22]  G. Hill,et al.  The effect of coccidial infection on iridescent plumage coloration in wild turkeys , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  A. Shapiro,et al.  The significance of wing pattern diversity in the Lycaenidae: mate discrimination by two recently diverged species , 2002 .

[24]  D. Kemp,et al.  Structural ultraviolet ornamentation in the butterfly Hypolimnas bolina L. (Nymphalidae): visual, morphological and ecological properties , 2006 .

[25]  J. Endler NATURAL SELECTION ON COLOR PATTERNS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  J. Sambles,et al.  Photonic structures in biology , 2003, Nature.

[27]  R. Bonduriansky The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence , 2001, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[28]  C. Boggs,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF WING COLOR: MALE MATE CHOICE OPPOSES ADAPTIVE WING COLOR DIVERGENCE IN COLIAS BUTTERFLIES , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution , 2002, Nature.

[30]  Rodolfo H. Torres,et al.  Anatomically diverse butterfly scales all produce structural colours by coherent scattering , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[31]  R. Silberglied Visual communication and sexual selection among butterflies , 1984 .

[32]  C. Darwin The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. By Charles Darwin. , 1874 .

[33]  Alison M. Sweeney,et al.  Insect communication: Polarized light as a butterfly mating signal , 2003, Nature.

[34]  H. B. Cott,et al.  Adaptive Coloration in Animals , 1940 .

[35]  P. Nicoletto,et al.  Consensus among females in their choice of males in the guppy Poecilia reticulata , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[36]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Preferences for ultraviolet partners in the blue tit , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  D. Kemp Sexual selection constrained by life history in a butterfly , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  S. Andersson Morphology of UV Reflectance in a Whistling-Thrush: Implications for the Study of Structural Colour Signalling in Birds , 1999 .

[39]  A. Monteiro,et al.  Female Bicyclus anynana butterflies choose males on the basis of their dorsal UV-reflective eyespot pupils , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  H. Knüttel,et al.  Host-plant-derived variation in ultraviolet wing patterns influences mate selection by male butterflies. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.