Options for Control of Reactive Power by Distributed Photovoltaic Generators

High-penetration levels of distributed photovoltaic (PV) generation on an electrical distribution circuit present several challenges and opportunities for distribution utilities. Rapidly varying irradiance conditions may cause voltage sags and swells that cannot be compensated by slowly responding utility equipment resulting in a degradation of power quality. Although not permitted under current standards for interconnection of distributed generation, fast-reacting, VAR-capable PV inverters may provide the necessary reactive power injection or consumption to maintain voltage regulation under difficult transient conditions. As side benefit, the control of reactive power injection at each PV inverter provides an opportunity and a new tool for distribution utilities to optimize the performance of distribution circuits, e.g., by minimizing thermal losses. We discuss and compare via simulation various design options for control systems to manage the reactive power generated by these inverters. An important design decision that weighs on the speed and quality of communication required is whether the control should be centralized or distributed (i.e., local). In general, we find that local control schemes are able to maintain voltage within acceptable bounds. We consider the benefits of choosing different local variables on which to control and how the control system can be continuously tuned between robust voltage control, suitable for daytime operation when circuit conditions can change rapidly, and loss minimization better suited for nighttime operation.

[1]  Felix F. Wu,et al.  Network Reconfiguration in Distribution Systems for Loss Reduction and Load Balancing , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[2]  M. E. Baran,et al.  Optimal sizing of capacitors placed on a radial distribution system , 1989 .

[3]  M. E. Baran,et al.  Optimal capacitor placement on radial distribution systems , 1989 .

[4]  Felix F. Wu,et al.  Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing , 1989 .

[5]  Michael Chertkov,et al.  Distributed control of reactive power flow in a radial distribution circuit with high photovoltaic penetration , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[6]  T. Funabashi,et al.  Optimal Distribution Voltage Control and Coordination With Distributed Generation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[7]  J. Bebic,et al.  Distribution System Voltage Performance Analysis for High-Penetration Photovoltaics , 2008 .

[8]  Antonio Moreno-Munoz,et al.  Power quality : mitigation technologies in a distributed environment , 2007 .

[9]  Felix F. Wu,et al.  Efficient integer optimization algorithms for optimal coordination of capacitors and regulators , 1990 .

[10]  Kevin P. Schneider,et al.  Modern Grid Initiative Distribution Taxonomy Final Report , 2008 .

[11]  Mohammad A. S. Masoum,et al.  Power Quality in Power Systems and Electrical Machines , 2008 .

[12]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Electric Energy Systems : Analysis and Operation , 2008 .

[13]  Michael Chertkov,et al.  Local Control of Reactive Power by Distributed Photovoltaic Generators , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[14]  R. Yokoyama,et al.  Coordinated allocation and control of voltage regulators based on reactive tabu search , 2005, 2005 IEEE Russia Power Tech.

[15]  Nikos D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Integrating distributed generation into electric power systems: A review of drivers, challenges and opportunities , 2007 .