Facebook Infidelity: When Poking Becomes Problematic

Recent research has focused on the Internet and relationships; however, little attention has been given to the specific role of social networking sites in relationship betrayal. Exploring the processes related to discovery of Facebook infidelity behaviors adds another layer to understanding Internet infidelity and highlights the behaviors unique to Facebook infidelity. Stories about cheating (N = 90), taken from the website FacebookCheating.com were analyzed using grounded theory methodology to create a process model of discovery. Researchers sought to answer four questions: (1) What is the experience of nonparticipating partners when their partners have engaged in infidelity behaviors on Facebook? (2) What are the basic social processes that occur when discovering the infidelity behaviors? And, (3) What are the basic psychological processes that occur? (4) What similarities or differences exist between the current research on offline and online infidelity and the process model from the current study? The categories are arranged in a process model, which depicts these processes as well as the emotional experience of the nonparticipating partner. The model highlights important phases through which the nonparticipating partner cycled following the discovery of the infidelity. These include appraising the boundary damage, acting on the appraisal, and making a decision about the relationship. Suggestions for clinical intervention based on this process are provided. Future research implications are also discussed.

[1]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[2]  S. Glass,et al.  Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender , 1992 .

[3]  E. Nelson,et al.  Dating relationships and infidelity: attitudes and behaviors. , 1995, Journal of sex & marital therapy.

[4]  P. Amato,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Marital Problems and Subsequent Divorce , 1997 .

[5]  M. Whisman,et al.  Therapists' perspectives of couple problems and treatment issues in couple therapy , 1997 .

[6]  Al Cooper,et al.  Sexuality and the Internet: Surfing into the New Millennium , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  Paul E. Yarab,et al.  Don't Even Think About It: The Role of Sexual Fantasies as Perceived Unfaithfulness in Heterosexual Dating Relationships , 1998 .

[8]  Azy Barak,et al.  Sex, Guys, and Cyberspace , 1999 .

[9]  J. Schneider,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Cybersex Participants: Gender Differences, Recovery Issues, and Implications for Therapists , 2000 .

[10]  Al Cooper,et al.  Online infidelity: A new dimension in couple relationships with implications for evaluation and treatment , 2000 .

[11]  F. A. Diblasio Decision-based forgiveness treatment in cases of marital infidelity. , 2000 .

[12]  Walid A. Afifi,et al.  Identity Concerns Following a Severe Relational Transgression: The Role of Discovery Method for the Relational Outcomes of Infidelity , 2001 .

[13]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  C. Russell,et al.  Emotional processes following disclosure of an extramarital affair. , 2002, Journal of marital and family therapy.

[15]  Al Cooper,et al.  Predicting the future of Internet sex: Online sexual activities in Sweden , 2003 .

[16]  J. Schneider The impact of compulsive cybersex behaviours on the family , 2003 .

[17]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Predicting the Future , 2003, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[18]  Romantic partners' use of pornography: its significance for women. , 2003, Journal of sex & marital therapy.

[19]  Paul R. Amato,et al.  People's Reasons for Divorcing , 2003 .

[20]  S. King The Impact of Compulsive Sexual Behaviors on Clergy Marriages: Perspectives and Concerns of the Pastor’s Wife , 2003 .

[21]  Monica T. Whitty,et al.  Pushing the Wrong Buttons: Men's and Women's Attitudes toward Online and Offline Infidelity , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[22]  R. Bergner,et al.  Romantic Partners Use of Pornography: Its Significance for Women , 2003, Journal of sex & marital therapy.

[23]  Monica T. Whitty,et al.  The Realness of Cybercheating , 2005 .

[24]  A. Blow,et al.  Infidelity in committed relationships I: a methodological review. , 2005, Journal of marital and family therapy.

[25]  Jill C. Manning The Impact of Internet Pornography on Marriage and the Family: A Review of the Research , 2006 .

[26]  Katherine M. Hertlein,et al.  Internet Infidelity: A Critical Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[27]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[28]  Kerry J. Daly,et al.  Qualitative Methods for Family Studies & Human Development , 2007 .

[29]  J. De Stefano,et al.  Extramarital Affairs: Basic Considerations and Essential Tasks in Clinical Work , 2008 .

[30]  Sandra L. Calvert,et al.  College students' social networking experiences on Facebook , 2009 .

[31]  Monica T. Whitty,et al.  Netiquette within married couples: Agreement about acceptable online behavior and surveillance between partners , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Sarah S. Tulane,et al.  Couples in Great Marriages Who Considered Divorcing , 2011 .

[33]  Catherine McGeehin Heilferty Ethical considerations in the study of online illness narratives: a qualitative review. , 2011, Journal of advanced nursing.

[34]  Amanda W. Bequette,et al.  The Gray Area: Exploring Attitudes Toward Infidelity and the Development of the Perceptions of Dating Infidelity Scale , 2011, The Journal of social psychology.

[35]  K. Hertlein,et al.  Essential elements of Internet infidelity treatment. , 2012, Journal of marital and family therapy.