SummaryIn an attempt to discover patterns of adult figurative language use, preference and comprehension, 30 Ss were asked to complete 4 different tasks: a composition, a test of simile preference, a test of simile production, and a test of metaphoric comprehension. Each test provided scores for both novel and clichéed usage. The composition task was also scored for total words while preference and production tasks were scored for literal usage, thus producing a total of 11 dependent variables across the complete set of tasks.Results revealed that Ss selected a higher number of novel figures under choice relative to production conditions. Correlational results revealed relationships across all 4 tasks for the categories of novel and frozen usage although certain tasks (i.e., simile preference and production) were more sensitive to novel diction while others (comprehension) were more sensitive to frozen diction. Within-task correlations, on the other hand, showed unique patterns for each of the tasks. Factor analyses of these correlations were found to produce a series of consistent three-factor solutions with the first of these factors concerned primarily with novel diction, the second with both novel and frozen comprehension, and the third primarily with frozen diction.Taken in combination, present results were interpreted to mean that while the distinction between novel and frozen is a meaningful one, specific task requirements can and do moderate the pattern of relationships obtained. This suggests that figurative language competence may not be a unitary process but one that is strongly affected by specific task and situational constraints and that future work, both methodological and theoretical, must take these factors into account.
[1]
Marilyn R. Pollio,et al.
The Development of Figurative Language in School Children.
,
1971
.
[2]
Douglas W. Ehninger,et al.
The metaphor in public address
,
1962
.
[3]
Howard R. Pollio,et al.
Psychology and the poetics of growth: Figurative language in psychology, psychotherapy, and education
,
1977
.
[4]
J. F. Dashiell.
A survey and synthesis of learning theories.
,
1935
.
[5]
H. Pollio,et al.
Sense and nonsense in thinking about anomaly and metaphor
,
1979
.
[6]
J. Barlow.
Training Manual for Identifying Figurative Language.
,
1971
.
[7]
Richard P. Honeck,et al.
Semantic memory for metaphor: The conceptual base hypothesis
,
1975,
Memory & cognition.
[8]
Ellen Winner,et al.
Children's metaphoric productions and preferences
,
1975,
Journal of Child Language.
[9]
H. Pollio,et al.
A Behavioural Analysis of Figurative Language in Psychotherapy: One Session in a Single Case-Study
,
1975,
Language and speech.
[10]
Hans Hoermann,et al.
The concept of sense constancy
,
1976
.
[11]
H. Pollio,et al.
The anomaly of anomaly
,
1977,
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.
[12]
Howard R. Pollio,et al.
The development of figurative language in children
,
1974
.
[13]
Howard Gardner,et al.
Metaphors and Modalities: How Children Project Polar Adjectives onto Diverse Domains.
,
1974
.
[14]
W. Gordon.
Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity
,
1961
.
[15]
H. H. Clark.
Psychology and language
,
1977
.
[16]
L. Jones,et al.
Metaphor and Related Subjects
,
1970
.
[17]
R. M. Billow,et al.
A cognitive developmental study of metaphor comprehension.
,
1975
.