Exploring How Peer Communities Enable Lead User Innovations to Become Standard Equipment in the Industry: Community Pull Effects

Literature on new product development indicates that on average around 40% of new products fail across different industries (e.g., Crawford, 1977; Crawford and Di Benedetto, 2008). Out of those that survive only few become widely accepted standard equipment in the industry (Utterback, 1996). Literature on entrepreneurship (e.g., Baron and Shane, 2008) and on innovation (e.g., Christensen, 1997) shows that such innovations often originate outside the boundaries of established firms. However, it is difficult to understand and analyze the exact source of such innovations and the entrepreneurial processes by which they are developed. It is therefore the aim of this study to shed light on how innovations become widely accepted by large segments of the market and specifically which demand-side forces are at work. An approach suitable for pursuing this objective is to focus on those individuals who are on the leading edge with respect to an important market trend (lead users) and their respective peer communities. As little knowledge is available, an explorative case study design is applied, working with cases from two different industries, specifically the medical equipment and sporting equipment industry. A longitudinal research design is used, extracting data from multiple respondents and various other sources such as reports, publications, databases, or community web pages. The research framework takes a process perspective by following the entrepreneurial processes from invention to commercialization and diffusion. In this process, micro-level variables at the individual and group level are analyzed as well as the barriers to be overcome by the individual innovator and the community. The findings show that communities play a central and active role in the entrepreneurial process. Community members provide valuable feedback on the overall potential of the lead users' ideas, participate by making concrete development contributions, acting as testers of the new products, and finally helping to diffuse the innovations inside and outside the community. We identify two pull effects on the part of the community: first, community members demand and facilitate the development of prototypes; and second, community members help to cross the chasm between first adopters and the early majority. This paper has various implications for entrepreneurship and innovation research. For entrepreneurship, this article points out peer communities as a specific kind of social network that plays a crucial role in entrepreneurial processes. For innovation research, this article emphasizes the interaction between lead users and their peer communities in the process of developing the next dominant product design.

[1]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[2]  C. Crawford Marketing Research and the New Product Failure Rate , 1977 .

[3]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[4]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  New Products Management , 1983 .

[5]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[6]  B. Shaw The Role of the Interaction between the User and the Manufacturer in Medical Equipment Innovation , 1985 .

[7]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[8]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[9]  Glen L. Urban,et al.  Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products , 1988 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[11]  B. Johannisson Economies of Overview — Guiding the External Growth of Small Firms , 1990 .

[12]  K. Eisenhardt Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[13]  E. Hippel,et al.  FROM EXPERIENCE: Developing New Product Concepts Via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a “Low-Tech” Field , 1992 .

[14]  W. Baumol Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: Existence and bounds , 1993 .

[15]  E. Hippel Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[16]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[17]  M. Bhave A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation , 1994 .

[18]  S. Birley,et al.  Personal networks and firm competitive strategy—A strategic or coincidental match? , 1994 .

[19]  Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al.  Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation , 1995 .

[20]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Entrepreneurial Networks and Business Performance: A Panel Study of Small and Medium-Sized Firms in the Research Triangle , 1995 .

[21]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[22]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[23]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .

[24]  Sylvie K. Chetty,et al.  The Case Study Method for Research in Small-and Medium-Sized Firms , 1996 .

[25]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991 , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[27]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[28]  Israel M. Kirzner Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach , 1997 .

[29]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  OPPORTUNITY AND CONSTRAINT: ORGANIZATIONS’ LEARNING FROM THE OPERATING AND COMPETITIVE EXPERIENCE OF INDUSTRIES , 1997 .

[30]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[31]  S. Venkataraman,et al.  The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor''s perspective , 1997 .

[32]  C. Perry Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing , 1998 .

[33]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar , 1998, First Monday.

[34]  R. Baron Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when enterpreneurs think differently than other people , 1998 .

[35]  J. Brüderl,et al.  Network Support and the Success of Newly Founded Business , 1998 .

[36]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[37]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[38]  G. O'Connor Market learning and radical innovation: A cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects , 1998 .

[39]  M. Montoya-Weiss,et al.  Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products , 1998 .

[40]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The Cathedral and the Bazaar , 2000 .

[41]  Geoffrey A. Moore Crossing the chasm : marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers , 1999 .

[42]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[43]  Dean A. Shepherd,et al.  Entrepreneurship as a Utility-Maximizing Response , 2000 .

[44]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[45]  Bill Gillham,et al.  Case Study Research Methods , 2000 .

[46]  Pamela D. Morrison,et al.  Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market , 2000 .

[47]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[48]  Dilanthi Amaratunga,et al.  Case study methodology as a means of theory building: performance measurement in facilities management organisations , 2001 .

[49]  Jason L. Jensen,et al.  Cumulating the Intellectual Gold of Case Study Research , 2001 .

[50]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[51]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[52]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs Via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software , 2002 .

[53]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues , 2002 .

[54]  S. Shane A General Theory of Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[55]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[56]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[57]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations , 2003 .

[58]  P. Davidsson,et al.  The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs , 2000 .

[59]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[60]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[61]  Per Davidsson,et al.  The Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: Some Suggestions , 2003 .

[62]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[63]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[64]  Scott Shane,et al.  Entrepreneurship: A Process Perspective , 2004 .

[65]  Erwin Danneels Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda , 2004 .

[66]  Saras D. Sarasvathy,et al.  The questions we ask and the questions we care about: reformulating some problems in entrepreneurship research , 2004 .

[67]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  When Do User-Innovators Start Firms? Towards a Theory of User Entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[68]  Christopher Lettl Users as Inventors and Developers of Radical Innovation , 2005 .

[69]  Sonali K. Shah From Innovation to Firm Formation in the Windsurfing, Skateboarding and Snowboarding Industries , 2005 .

[70]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  User-innovators and "local" information: The case of mountain biking , 2005 .

[71]  C. Markides Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory* , 2006 .

[72]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  The Promise of Research on Open Source Software , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[73]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[74]  Reinhard Prügl,et al.  Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: Insights from two extreme sports communities , 2006 .

[75]  Denis A. Grégoire,et al.  Is There Conceptual Convergence in Entrepreneurship Research? A Co–Citation Analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981–2004 , 2006 .

[76]  W. Gartner,et al.  Are you Talking to Me? The Nature of Community in Entrepreneurship Scholarship , 2006 .

[77]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead User Theory , 2005 .

[78]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Users' Contributions to Radical Innovation: Evidence from Four Cases in the Field of Medical Equipment Technology , 2006 .

[79]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  How User Innovations Become Commercial Products: A Theoretical Investigation and Case Study , 2006 .

[80]  Christoph Hienerth The Commercialization of User Innovations: The Development of the Rodeo Kayak Industry , 2006 .

[81]  S. Zahra,et al.  Scholarly Communities in Entrepreneurship Research: A Co–Citation Analysis , 2006 .

[82]  G. Tellis,et al.  Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science , 2006 .

[83]  R. Baron Opportunity Recognition as Pattern Recognition: How Entrepreneurs “Connect the Dots” to Identify New Business Opportunities , 2006 .

[84]  Jeffery S. McMullen,et al.  Entrepreneurial Action And The Role Of Uncertainty In The Theory Of The Entrepreneur , 2006 .

[85]  Ksenia Podoynitsyna,et al.  Success Factors in New Ventures: A Meta-analysis , 2007 .

[86]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[87]  E. Hippel Horizontal Innovation Networks - By and For Users , 2007 .

[88]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  The Accidental Entrepreneur: The Emergent and Collective Process of User Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[89]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[90]  Dimo Dimov,et al.  Beyond the Single-Person, Single-Insight Attribution in Understanding Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2007 .

[91]  L. Jeppesen,et al.  The Value of Openness in Scientific Problem Solving , 2007 .

[92]  Yi Xu,et al.  Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving , 2008, Manag. Sci..