Carbon efficiency, technology, and the role of innovation patterns: Evidence from German plant-level microdata

We describe the determinants of energy intensity, carbon intensity, and CO2 emissions in the German manufacturing sector between 1995 and 2007, applying the LMDI index decomposition technique not to aggregate but to micro data. We trace back changes in total CO2 emissions from manufacturing to changes in activity level, structural change between sectors, structural change within sectors, energy intensity at the firm level, fuel mix, and emission factors. We use a firm data set on energy use from the AFiD-Panel on German manufacturing plants that allows us to analyze energy use at the firm level with unprecedented accuracy. Our results show that heterogeneity among firms within one sector is a driver of energy intensity, carbon intensity, and CO2 emissions. By stressing the importance of competition between firms for energy efficiency improvements, we highlight a factor that has so far been widely ignored. Firm heterogeneity has so far rarely included in index decomposition analyses. Contrary to wide-spread beliefs, energy intensity improvements at the firm level do not play a significant role in reducing emissions. Based on findings from the decomposition analysis, we use sector-level results on the relative importance of improvements in firm-level energy intensity and intra-sectoral structural change to distinguish two different innovation channels: innovation by technology and by entrants. We show that incumbent firms in a number of sectors, including some of the most energy intensive ones, do not significantly improve their energy efficiency. Innovation takes place via new entrants instead, rendering standard policies targeted at firm-level energy efficiency ineffective.

[1]  Leslie A. Martin,et al.  Energy efficiency gains from trade : greenhouse gas emissions and India ’ s manufacturing sector , 2011 .

[2]  G. Hankinson,et al.  Electricity consumption, electricity intensity and industrial structure , 1983 .

[3]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation , 2001 .

[4]  B. W. Ang,et al.  The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide , 2005 .

[5]  Account for sector heterogeneity in China's energy consumption: Sector price indices vs. GDP deflator , 2010 .

[6]  J. Sun.  Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: A complete decomposition model , 1998 .

[7]  Danae Diakoulaki,et al.  Decomposition analysis for assessing the progress in decoupling industrial growth from CO2 emissions in the EU manufacturing sector , 2007 .

[8]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Factors shaping aggregate energy intensity trend for industry: Energy intensity versus product mix , 2007 .

[9]  Bart Los,et al.  Structural decomposition techniques : sense and sensitivity , 1998 .

[10]  B. W. Ang,et al.  The Application of the Divisia Index to the Decomposition of Changes in Industrial Energy Consumption , 1992 .

[11]  L. Schipper,et al.  International Comparisons of Sectoral Carbon Dioxide Emissions Using a Cross-Country Decomposition Technique , 2001 .

[12]  D. Haralambopoulos,et al.  CO2 emissions in Greece for 1990-2002: A decomposition analysis and comparison of results using the Arithmetic Mean Divisia Index and Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index techniques , 2008 .

[13]  R. K. Cattell,et al.  Structural change and energy efficiency in industry , 1983 .

[14]  Gale A. Boyd,et al.  Decomposition of changes in energy intensity: A comparison of the Divisia index and other methods☆ , 1988 .

[15]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition , 1998 .

[16]  Delphine François,et al.  A Shapley decomposition of carbon emissions without residuals , 2002 .