Enhanced three-dimensional reconstruction from confocal scanning microscope images. II. Depth discrimination versus signal-to-noise ratio in partially confocal images.

The enhanced depth discrimination of a confocal scanning optical microscope is produced by a pinhole aperture placed in front of the detector to reject out-of-focus light. Strictly confocal behavior is impractical because an infinitesimally small aperture would collect very little light and would result in images with a poor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), while a finite-sized partially confocal aperture provides a better SNR but reduced depth discrimination. Reconstruction algorithms, such as the expectationmaximization algorithm for maximum likelihood, can be applied to partially confocal images in order to achieve better resolution, but because they are sensitive to noise in the data, there is a practical trade-off involved. With a small aperture, fewer iterations of the reconstruction algorithm are necessary to achieve the desired resolution, but the low a priori SNR will result in a noisy reconstruction, at least when no regularization is used. With a larger aperture the a priori SNR is larger but the resolution is lower, and more iterations of the algorithm are necessary to reach the desired resolution; at some point the a posteriori SNR is lower than the a priori value. We present a theoretical analysis of the SNR-toresolution trade-off partially confocal imaging, and we present two studies that use the expectationmaximization algorithm as a postprocessor; these studies show that a for a given task there is an optimum aperture size, departures from which result in a lower a posteriori SNR.

[1]  H. H. Hopkins The frequency response of a defocused optical system , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[3]  G. J. Brakenhoff,et al.  Confocal scanning light microscopy with high aperture immersion lenses , 1979 .

[4]  I. Good,et al.  Density Estimation and Bump-Hunting by the Penalized Likelihood Method Exemplified by Scattering and Meteorite Data , 1980 .

[5]  K. Fujiwara,et al.  Distribution of alpha-actinin in single isolated smooth muscle cells , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  David A. Agard,et al.  Three-dimensional architecture of a polytene nucleus , 1983, Nature.

[7]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Theory and practice of scanning optical microscopy , 1984 .

[8]  P. Danielsson,et al.  Three-dimensional microscopy using a confocal laser scanning microscope. , 1985, Optics letters.

[9]  J Bille,et al.  Reconstructing 3-D light-microscopic images by digital image processing. , 1985, Applied optics.

[10]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  The Use of Sieves to Stabilize Images Produced with the EM Algorithm for Emission Tomography , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  Ernst H. K. Stelzer,et al.  Optical fluorescence microscopy in three dimensions: microtomoscopy , 1985 .

[12]  L. Shepp,et al.  A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985 .

[13]  C. J. R. Sheppard,et al.  The spatial frequency cut-off in three-dimensional imaging II , 1986 .

[14]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  T Wilson,et al.  Size of the detector in confocal imaging systems. , 1987, Optics letters.

[16]  Z. Liang Statistical models of a priori information for image processing: neighboring correlation constraints , 1988 .

[17]  Tony Wilson,et al.  Three‐dimensional imaging in confocal imaging systems with finite sized detectors , 1988 .

[18]  Timothy J. Holmes Maximum-likelihood image restoration adapted for noncoherent optical imaging , 1988 .

[19]  Eric W. Hansen,et al.  Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Of Noisy Confocal Scanning Microscope Images , 1989, Optics & Photonics.

[20]  Chusuke Munakata,et al.  Calculation of three-dimensional optical transfer function for a confocal scanning fluorescent microscope , 1989 .

[21]  Chusuke Munakata,et al.  Dependence of 3-D optical transfer functions on the pinhole radius in a fluorescent confocal optical microscope. , 1990, Applied optics.

[22]  J. Conchello,et al.  Enhanced 3-D reconstruction from confocal scanning microscope images. 1: Deterministic and maximum likelihood reconstructions. , 1990, Applied optics.

[23]  M I Miller,et al.  Bayesian image reconstruction for emission tomography incorporating Good's roughness prior on massively parallel processors. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Regularized linear method for reconstruction of three-dimensional microscopic objects from optical sections. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  R. A. Gaskins,et al.  Nonparametric roughness penalties for probability densities , 2022 .