The Effect of Country of Origin on Judgments of Multinational Organizations Involved in a Crisis

Abstract Country-of-origin effects research has shown that consumers tend to form impressions of countries and their major exports over time. These general evaluations can serve as stereotypes or judgment shortcuts invoked by consumers when they consider a product purchase or their attitude toward a given product. The current study used an experimental design to examine the effect of country of origin and outgroup status on how fictitious multinational organizations were evaluated by American and Chinese citizens after a crisis situation. Specifically, participants were asked to make an attribution for a product crisis associated with an organization based in China, Japan, Mexico, or the United States. The study found that evaluations of the organization and its behavior were based more on overall evaluations of the country in which the organization was headquartered than on simple outgroup status.

[1]  J. D. Hobbs Treachery by any Other Name , 1995 .

[2]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Questions and answers in attitude surveys , 1982 .

[3]  H. Kelley The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[4]  L. L. Thurstone,et al.  The Measurement of Attitudes. , 1950 .

[5]  T. Kostova,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise , 1999 .

[6]  Shaomin Li,et al.  The Great Leap Forward: The Transition from Relation-Based Governance to Rule-Based Governance , 2004 .

[7]  Xu Yan The impact of the regulatory framework on fixed-mobile interconnection settlements: the case of China and Hong Kong , 2001 .

[8]  Richard Ice,et al.  Corporate Publics and Rhetorical Strategies , 1991 .

[9]  Debra A. Kernisky Proactive Crisis Management and Ethical Discourse: Dow Chemical's Issues Management Bulletins 1979-1990 , 1997 .

[10]  I. Kesner,et al.  The myth of full disclosure: A look at organizational communications during crises , 1994 .

[11]  W. T. Coombs,et al.  Information and Compassion in Crisis Responses: A Test of Their Effects , 1999 .

[12]  Keith Michael Hearit,et al.  Apologies and Public Relations Crises at Chrysler, Toshiba, and Volvo. , 1994 .

[13]  Larry Press,et al.  The Internet in India and China , 2002, First Monday.

[14]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Effects of Country-of-Origin and Product-Attribute Information on Product Evaluation: An Information Processing Perspective , 1989 .

[15]  Dianne M. Finkelstein,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2005, Technometrics.

[16]  William L. Benoit,et al.  AT&T: “Apologies are not enough” , 1994 .

[17]  Durairaj Maheswaran,et al.  Cultural Variations in Country of Origin Effects , 2000 .

[18]  Myria W. Allen,et al.  Legitimation endeavors: Impression management strategies used by an organization in crisis , 1994 .

[19]  M. Roth,et al.  Matching Product Catgeory and Country Image Perceptions: A Framework for Managing Country-of-Origin Effects , 1992 .

[20]  Laura M. Arpan,et al.  Stealing thunder: Analysis of the effects of proactive disclosure of crisis information , 2005 .

[21]  A. Marcus,et al.  Victims and Shareholders: The Dilemmas of Presenting Corporate Policy During A Crisis , 1991 .

[22]  Timothy L. Sellnow,et al.  Ambiguous Argument as Advocacy in Organizational Crisis Communication , 1995 .

[23]  J. Klein,et al.  CONSUMER ANIMOSITY AND CONSUMER ETHNOCENTRISM: AN ANALYSIS OF UNIQUE ANTECEDENTS , 1999 .

[24]  T. Sellnow Scientific Argument in Organizational Crisis Communication: The Case of Exxon. , 1993 .

[25]  Larry Press,et al.  The Internet in India and China , 2002 .

[26]  W. Bilkey,et al.  Country-of-Origin Effects on Product Evaluations , 1982 .

[27]  C. Min Han,et al.  Country Image: Halo or Summary Construct? , 1989 .

[28]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[29]  R. Peterson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Country-of-Origin Effects , 1995 .

[30]  Edward McAuley,et al.  Measuring Causal Attributions: The Revised Causal Dimension Scale (CDSII) , 1992 .

[31]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change , 1978 .

[32]  K. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Public Relations vs. Legal Strategies in Organizational Crisis Decisions. , 1995 .

[33]  A. G. Herrero,et al.  An Integrated Symmetrical Model for Crisis-Communications Management , 1996 .

[34]  Peter Ehrenhaus Attribution Theory: Implications for Intercultural Communication , 1982 .

[35]  Kathleen Fearn-Banks Crisis Communications: A Casebook Approach , 1996 .

[36]  D. Sturges Communicating through Crisis , 1994 .

[37]  Israel D. Nebenzahl,et al.  Multinational Production: Effect on Brand Value , 1986 .

[38]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  The Cross-Cultural Challenge to Social Psychology , 1988 .

[39]  Philippe Cattin,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study of “Made in” Concepts , 1982 .

[40]  Sherry J. Holladay,et al.  Communication and Attributions in a Crisis: An Experimental Study in Crisis Communication , 1996 .

[41]  David W. Guth Organizational crisis experience and public relations roles , 1995 .

[42]  Laura M. Arpan,et al.  Stormy weather: testing “stealing thunder” as a crisis communication strategy to improve communication flow between organizations and journalists , 2003 .

[43]  W. T. Coombs,et al.  An Analytic Framework for Crisis Situations: Better Responses From a Better Understanding of the Situation , 1998 .

[44]  B. Weiner,et al.  Perceiving the Causes of Success and Failure , 1989 .

[45]  M. Yagci Evaluating the Effects of Country-of-Origin and Consumer Ethnocentrism , 2001 .

[46]  D. Maheswaran,et al.  Country of Origin as a Stereotype: Effects of Consumer Expertise and Attribute Strength on Product Evaluations , 1994 .