Observation versus Perception in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Participation Equality in Computer-Mediated Communication

[1]  Julia E. Hoch,et al.  Virtual teams in organizations , 2017 .

[2]  David Stewart,et al.  Online Focus Groups , 2017 .

[3]  Sven Laumer,et al.  A Literature Review on Enterprise Social Media Collaboration in Virtual Teams: Challenges, Determinants, Implications and Impacts , 2016, CPR.

[4]  P. Arnfalk,et al.  Green IT in Practice: Virtual Meetings in Swedish Public Agencies , 2016 .

[5]  N. Yee,et al.  The Digital Workforce and the Workplace of the Future , 2016 .

[6]  Tara Matthews,et al.  When Distance Doesn't Really Matter: Effects of Geographic Dispersion on Participation in Online Enterprise Communities , 2016, CSCW.

[7]  L. Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams Research , 2015 .

[8]  Bruce A. Reinig,et al.  On the Measurement of Participation Equality , 2014, Int. J. e Collab..

[9]  Russell Haines,et al.  Anonymity in Computer-Mediated Communication: More Contrarian Ideas with Less Influence , 2014 .

[10]  Gabriele Piccoli,et al.  Impact of Mobility and Timing on User-Generated Content , 2014, MIS Q. Executive.

[11]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Critical Realism in Information Systems Research , 2013, MIS Q..

[12]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Enterprise Social Media: Definition, History, and Prospects for the Study of Social Technologies in Organizations , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  Uday S. Murthy,et al.  Why computer-mediated communication improves the effectiveness of fraud brainstorming , 2012, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Alan Kwan,et al.  Comparing the effectiveness of face to face and computer mediated collaboration , 2012, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[15]  Michael Muller Lurking as personal trait or situational disposition: lurking and contributing in enterprise social media , 2012, CSCW '12.

[16]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[17]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  The Benefits of Synchronous Collaborative Information Visualization: Evidence from an Experimental Evaluation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[18]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media , 2009, GROUP.

[19]  B. Shneiderman,et al.  The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation , 2009 .

[20]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement , 2008 .

[21]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Xiaojing Yang,et al.  Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising , 2007 .

[23]  Roberto J. Mejias The Interaction of Process Losses, Process Gains, and Meeting Satisfaction Within Technology-Supported Environments , 2007 .

[24]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  To Identify or Not to Identify: A Theoretical Model of Receiver Responses to Anonymous Communication , 2007 .

[25]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Roberto J. Mejias,et al.  The Effects of National Culture and Anonymity on Flaming and Criticalness in GSS-Supported Discussions , 2004 .

[27]  Jerry Fjermestad,et al.  An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[28]  R. Weber Editor's comments: the rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: a personal view , 2004 .

[29]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  Equality of participation and influence in groups: The effects of communication medium and sex composition , 1995, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[30]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Identification of Comment Authorship in Anonymous Group Support Systems , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  The Adoption and Use of GSS in Project Teams: Toward More Participative Processes and Outcomes , 2003, MIS Q..

[33]  Bruce A. Reinig,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Satisfaction with the Process and Outcomes of Teamwork , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Jeffrey E. Teich,et al.  Perceptions of contribution in multi-cultural groups in non-GDSS and GDSS environments , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[40]  P. Bliese Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation , 1998 .

[41]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Technology, Group Process, and Group Outcomes: Testing the Connections in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[42]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Consensus and Perceived Satisfaction Levels: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of GSS and Non-GSS Outcomes within and between the United States and Mexico , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think , 1996, MIS Q..

[44]  Jody Clay-Warner,et al.  Effects of authority structures and gender on interaction in same-sex task groups , 1996 .

[45]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Getting a Clue , 1996 .

[46]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Technical aspects of Muthén's liscomp approach to estimation of latent variable relations with a comprehensive measurement model , 1995 .

[47]  Sherry K. Schneider,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL INFORMATION: STATUS SALIENCE AND STATUS DIFFERENCES , 1995 .

[48]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Developmental differences between distributed and face-to-face groups in electronically supported meeting environments: An exploratory investigation , 1995 .

[49]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication , 1995, J. Organ. Comput..

[50]  Craig K. Tyran,et al.  The software inspection: the task and mechanisms for group support , 1993 .

[51]  S. Weisband Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups , 1992 .

[52]  Craig K. Tyran,et al.  The Application of Electronic Meeting Technology to Support Strategic Management , 1992, MIS Q..

[53]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Electronic Meeting Systems: Evidence from a Low Structure Environment , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  Catherine Kirchmeyer,et al.  Multicultural Groups , 1992 .

[55]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[56]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[57]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[58]  Russell Spears,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, DEINDIVIDUATION AND GROUP DECISION-MAKING , 1991 .

[59]  Russell Spears,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication, De-Individuation and Group Decision-Making , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[60]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[61]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making, 3: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[62]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[63]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[64]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[65]  Philip M. Dixon,et al.  Bootstrapping the gini coefficient of inequality , 1987 .

[66]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[67]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[68]  J. Werbel,et al.  Effects of Purpose of the Appraisal and Expectation of Validation On Self-Appraisal Leniency , 1986 .

[69]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[70]  Charles E. Beck,et al.  The manager's open door and the communication climate , 1986 .

[71]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[72]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Recent Developments in Structural Equation Modeling , 1982 .

[73]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis , 1982 .

[74]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[75]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .

[76]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[77]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Testing two classes of theories about group induced shifts in individual choice , 1973 .

[78]  A. Zellner An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias , 1962 .