Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Canadian Peat Extraction and Restoration

Abstract The Canadian horticultural peat industry generates carbon emissions through various methods of peat extraction, processing, and land-use changes. This study provides a carbon emissions analysis comparing the traditional vacuum harvest (VH) and block-cut (BC) extraction techniques to a new acrotelm transplant (AT) method that restores natural peatland function by preserving and replacing the surface layer vegetation as part of the extraction process. The relative global warming potential for each extraction method was determined by estimating carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane exchange for each phase of peat extraction, including emissions from land-use change and machinery fuel consumption. Preliminary findings, based on 1 y of measurements, indicate that the AT technique has the lowest annual carbon emissions compared to the VH and BC methods. Projected total carbon emissions from a 75-ha peatland after 50 y of extraction using the AT technique produced a sink of approximately 3300 t CO2 equivalents (CO2-e). This represents a marked reduction in total carbon emissions estimated for the VH (19 000 t CO2-e) and BC (29 000 t CO2-e) extraction techniques. This analysis suggests that the AT method reestablishes peat accumulation and peatland carbon storage function more effectively than the VH and BC methods, which are associated with delayed restoration efforts. Consequently, the AT technique has the potential to greatly reduce the carbon footprint of the Canadian horticultural peat industry.

[1]  J. Price.  Soil moisture, water tension, and water table relationships in a managed cutover bog , 1997 .

[2]  E. Tuittila,et al.  Annual CO2 and CH4 fluxes of pristine boreal mires as a background for the lifecycle analyses of peat energy , 2007 .

[3]  T. Moore,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Canadian Peat Extraction, 1990–2000: A Life-cycle Analysis , 2005, Ambio.

[4]  S. Frolking,et al.  How northern peatlands influence the Earth's radiative budget: Sustained methane emission versus sustained carbon sequestration , 2006 .

[5]  E. Gorham.  Northern Peatlands: Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable Responses to Climatic Warming. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  R. Striegl,et al.  Winter fluxes of CO2 and CH4 from subalpine soils in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado , 1998 .

[7]  J. Tolonen.  The role of peat in Finnish greenhouse gas balances , 2000 .

[8]  Soili Kojola,et al.  Greenhouse impact due to different peat fuel utilisation chains in Finland — a life-cycle approach , 2007 .

[9]  Jukka Turunen,et al.  Estimating carbon accumulation rates of undrained mires in Finland–application to boreal and subarctic regions , 2002 .

[10]  J. Waddington,et al.  Methane emissions from a peatland following restoration , 2007 .

[11]  R. Petrone,et al.  Mulch decomposition impedes recovery of net carbon sink function in a restored peatland , 2003 .

[12]  Eville Gorham,et al.  The biogeochemistry of northern peatlands and its possible responses to global warming , 1995 .

[13]  J. Waddington,et al.  Net ecosystem CO2 exchange of a cutover peatland rehabilitated with a transplanted acrotelm , 2008 .

[14]  P. Richard,et al.  Contemporary carbon balance and late Holocene carbon accumulation in a northern peatland , 2007 .

[15]  J. Waddington,et al.  Moisture dynamics and hydrophysical properties of a transplanted acrotelm on a cutover peatland , 2008 .

[16]  P. Martikainen,et al.  Short-term effect of restoration on vegetation change and methane emissions from peatlands drained for forestry in southern Finland , 1998 .

[17]  J. Waddington,et al.  EFFECT OF PEATLAND DRAINAGE, HARVESTING, AND RESTORATION ON ATMOSPHERIC WATER AND CARBON EXCHANGE , 2000 .

[18]  J. Waddington,et al.  Cutover peatlands: A persistent source of atmospheric CO2 , 2002 .

[19]  M. Greenwood.  THE EFFECT OF RESTORATION ON C0₂ EXCHANGE IN A CUTOVER PEATLAND , 2005 .

[20]  J. Waddington,et al.  Atmospheric CO2 sequestration in restored mined peatlands , 2001 .

[21]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[22]  J. Waddington,et al.  Moisture controls on Sphagnum growth and CO2 exchange on a cutover bog , 2003 .

[23]  R. Petrone,et al.  Ecosystem scale evapotranspiration and net CO2 exchange from a restored peatland , 2001 .

[24]  L. Zetterberg,et al.  Climate impact from peat utilisation in Sweden , 2004 .

[25]  M. Thériault,et al.  The Regeneration of a Highly Disturbed Ecosystem: A Mined Peatland in Southern Québec , 2002, Ecosystems.