A Biomechatronic EPP upper-limb prosthesis controller and its performance comparison to other topologies

Historically, Classic Extended Physiological Proprioception (EPP) as an upper-limb prosthesis control topology has been outperforming functionally all other topologies of the past. A novel Biomechatronic EPP controller has been designed to overcome shortcomings of the classic EPP control topology, and has been hypothesized to be functionally equivalent to the classic EPP topology. Using the dSpace realtime hardware platform and other mechanical and electronic components, the following were developed in the lab: (a) A Biomechatronic EPP controller, (b) a classic EPP controller, (c) an “unconnected” controller and (d) an EMG controller. All four topologies were tested in the lab using the target experiments methodology. Initial results of one subject show that performance of (a) is superior or comparable to (b) and superior to (c) and (d).

[1]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Fitts' Throughput and the Remarkable Case of Touch-Based Target Selection , 2015, HCI.

[2]  P. Herberts The Control of upper-extremity prostheses and orthoses , 1974 .

[3]  Efie Moutopoulou,et al.  Feasibility of a biomechatronic EPP Upper Limb Prosthesis Controller , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[4]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  A. Welford Fundamentals of skill / A.T. Welford , 1968 .

[6]  Choong Sik Park,et al.  Advantages of externally powered prosthesis with feedback system using pseudo-cineplasty. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  Georgios A. Bertos,et al.  A biomechatronic Extended Physiological Proprioception (EPP) controller for upper-limb prostheses , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[8]  D. Childress,et al.  Design and evaluation of a prosthesis control system based on the concept of extended physiological proprioception. , 1984, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  Dudley S. Childress,et al.  Microprocessor based E.P.P. position controller for electric-powered upper-limb prostheses , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[10]  Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.  3D printed endoskeleton with a soft skin for upper-limb body actuated prosthesis , 2017, 2017 IEEE 5th Portuguese Meeting on Bioengineering (ENBENG).

[11]  Ahmed W. Shehata,et al.  The effect of myoelectric prosthesis control strategies and feedback level on adaptation rate for a target acquisition task , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[12]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Fitts' throughput and the speed-accuracy tradeoff , 2008, CHI.

[13]  Childress Ds,et al.  Design and evaluation of a prosthesis control system based on the concept of extended physiological proprioception. , 1984 .

[14]  E. R. F. W. Grossman,et al.  The Information-Capacity of the Human Motor-System in Pursuit Tracking , 1960 .

[15]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Bilateral control of master-slave manipulators for ideal kinesthetic coupling-formulation and experiment , 1994, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.