The role of morphology in acoustic reduction

This paper examines the role of morphological structure in the reduced pronunciation of morphologically complex words by discussing and re-analyzing data from the literature. Acoustic reduction refers to the phenomenon that, in spontaneous speech, phonemes may be shorter or absent. We review studies investigating effects of the repetition of a morpheme, of whether a segment plays a crucial role in the identification of its morpheme, and of a word's morphological decomposability. We conclude that these studies report either no effects of morphological structure or effects that are open to alternative interpretations. Our analysis also reveals the need for a uniform definition of morphological decomposability. Furthermore, we examine whether the reduction of segments in morphologically complex words correlates with these segments' contribution to the identification of the whole word, and discuss previous studies and new analyses supporting this hypothesis. We conclude that the data show no convincing evidence that morphological structure conditions reduction, which contrasts with the expectations of several models of speech production and of morphological processing (e.g., WEAVER++ and dual-route models). The data collected so far support psycholinguistic models which assume that all morphologically complex words are processed as complete units.

[1]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[2]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[3]  Morris Halle,et al.  The rules of language , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[4]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[5]  Jonathan Marier Dalby,et al.  Phonetic structure of fast speech in American english , 1984 .

[6]  C. Fowler,et al.  Talkers' signaling of new and old. words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction , 1987 .

[7]  Royal Skousen,et al.  Analogical Modeling Of Language , 1989 .

[8]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[9]  S Pinker,et al.  Rules of language. , 1991, Science.

[10]  Beth L. Losiewicz The effect of frequency on linguistic morphology , 1992 .

[11]  Dick R. van Bergem,et al.  A model of coarticulatory effects on the schwa , 1994, Speech Commun..

[12]  G. Booij The Phonology of Dutch , 1995 .

[13]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Modeling morphological processing. , 1995 .

[14]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[15]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  An acoustic description of consonant reduction , 1999, Speech Commun..

[17]  E. Bard,et al.  Controlling the Intelligibility of Referring Expressions in Dialogue , 2000 .

[18]  M. Ernestus Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch. A Corpus-based Study of the Phonology-phonetics Interface , 2000 .

[19]  Nelleke Oostdijk,et al.  The Design of the Spoken Dutch Corpus , 2002 .

[20]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  Information structure and efficiency in speech production , 2003, INTERSPEECH.

[21]  J. Hay Causes and Consequences of Word Structure , 2003 .

[22]  Keith Johnson Massive reduction in conversational American English , 2004 .

[23]  Guillaume Gravier,et al.  The ESTER phase II evaluation campaign for the rich transcription of French broadcast news , 2005, INTERSPEECH.

[24]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words , 2006 .

[26]  Jason M. Brenier,et al.  Predictability Effects on Durations of Content and Function Words in Conversational English , 2009 .

[27]  Francisco Torreira,et al.  The Nijmegen Corpus of Casual Spanish , 2010, LREC.

[28]  R. Baayen,et al.  Morphological effects on fine phonetic detail: The case of Dutch -igheid , 2010 .

[29]  Cédric Gendrot,et al.  What affects the presence versus absence of schwa and its duration: a corpus analysis of French connected speech. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants [Editorial] , 2011 .

[31]  James M. McQueen,et al.  Co-occurrence of reduced word forms in natural speech , 2012, INTERSPEECH.

[32]  Mark Davies The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) , 2012 .

[33]  Barbara Schuppler,et al.  How linguistic and probabilistic properties of a word affect the realization of its final /t/: Studies at the phonemic and sub-phonemic level , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[34]  Francisco Torreira,et al.  Weakening of Intervocalic /s/ in the Nijmegen Corpus of Casual Spanish , 2012, Phonetica.

[35]  L. Feldman Modeling Morphological Processing , 2013 .