Comparison of the filtration characteristics between biological powdered activated carbon sludge and activated sludge in submerged membrane bioreactors

The filtration performances of submerged membrane bioreactors (SMBR) with and without the addition of powdered activated carbon (PAC) were investigated respectively under the same feed and operation conditions. A series of experiments were conducted to analyze near-critical flux, effect of air-scouring rate and time of stable filtration operation of both systems. The experimental results demonstrated that pronounced flux enhancement was achieved by adding 1.2 g/L PAC. The near-critical flux for the biological powdered activated carbon (BPAC) system was about 32% higher than that for the activated sludge (AS) system. Increasing the air-scouring rate led to a more significant flux improvement for the BPAC system compared to the AS system. Long-term operation indicated that, at constant flux, the TMP increasing rate of the BPAC system could be lagged and thus cause the extension of operating intervals about 1.8 times compared to the AS system. Quantitative calculations showed the total hydraulic resistance of the BPAC system was about 44% lower than that of the AS system, and this decrease was mainly caused by the reduction in cake resistance. Analyses were then made from various aspects such as floc size distribution and apparent viscosity of the mixed liquor to elucidate the major factors giving rise to different filtration characteristics.

[1]  Jungwon Choi,et al.  The behavior of membrane fouling initiation on the crossflow membrane bioreactor system , 2002 .

[2]  Simon Judd,et al.  Membrane Fouling in Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment , 2002 .

[3]  Rui Liu,et al.  Study on hydraulic characteristics in a submerged membrane bioreactor process , 2000 .

[4]  Chung-Hak Lee,et al.  Effect of Powdered Activated Carbon on the Performance of an Aerobic Membarane Bioreactor: Comparison between Cross‐Flow and Submerged Membrane Systems , 2003, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[5]  Massoud Pirbazari,et al.  Hybrid membrane filtration process for leachate treatment , 1996 .

[6]  H. Chun,et al.  Comparison of ultrafiltration characteristics between activated sludge and BAC sludge , 1998 .

[7]  S. Ohgaki,et al.  Sorption characteristics of biological powdered activated carbon in BPAC-MF (biological powdered activated carbon-microfiltration) system for refractory organic removal , 1997 .

[8]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  The role of blocking and cake filtration in MBR fouling , 2003 .

[9]  T. Arnot,et al.  In situ manipulation of critical flux in a submerged membrane bioreactor using variable aeration rates, and effects of membrane history , 2004 .

[10]  Renbi Bai,et al.  MEMBRANE FOULING AND CLEANING IN MICROFILTRATION OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE WASTEWATER , 2003 .

[11]  Kwang-Ho Choo,et al.  Membrane fouling mechanisms in the membrane-coupled anaerobic bioreactor , 1996 .

[12]  Shinichiro Ohgaki,et al.  Biological powdered activated carbon (BPAC) microfiltration for wastewater reclamation and reuse , 1996 .

[13]  Simon Judd,et al.  Air sparging of a submerged MBR for municipal wastewater treatment , 2002 .

[14]  A. Fane,et al.  Hydraulic resistance and fouling of microfilters by Candida utilis in fermentation broth , 1995, Biotechnology and bioengineering.