Review of older non seismically detailed reinforced concrete building collapses shows that most collapses are triggered by failures in columns, beam-column joints, and slab-column connections. Using data from laboratory studies, failure models have previously been developed to estimate loading conditions that correspond to failure of column components. These failure models have been incorporated in nonlinear dynamic analysis software, enabling complete dynamic simulations of building response including component failure and the progression of collapse. A reinforced concrete frame analytical model incorporating column shear and axial failure elements was subjected to a suite of near-fault ground motions recorded during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. The results of this study show sensitivity of the frame response to ground motions recorded from the same earthquake, at sites of close proximity, and with similar soil conditions. This suggests that the variability of ground motion from site to site (so-called intra-event variability) plays an important role in determining which buildings will collapse in a given earthquake.
[1]
M. EERI.
RC Building Damage Statistics and SDF Response with Design Seismic Forces
,
2001
.
[2]
James O. Jirsa,et al.
Behavior of concrete under compressive loadings
,
1969
.
[3]
Manabu Yoshimura,et al.
Gravity Load Collapse of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Brittle Failure Modes
,
2002
.
[4]
Jack P. Moehle,et al.
Drift Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Light Transverse Reinforcement
,
2005
.
[5]
J. Moehle,et al.
SHEAR STRENGTH MODEL FOR LIGHTLY REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS
,
2004
.
[6]
Jack P. Moehle,et al.
Axial Capacity Model for Shear-Damaged Columns
,
2005
.
[7]
G. W. Housner,et al.
Behavior of Structures During Earthquakes
,
1959
.