A consumption-based approach to carbon emission accounting – sectoral differences and environmental benefits

In recent years there has been growing concern about the emission trade balances of countries. This is due to the fact that countries with an open economy are active players in international trade. Trade is not only a major factor in forging a country's economic structure, but contributes to the movement of embodied emissions beyond country borders. This issue is especially relevant from the carbon accounting policy and domestic production perspective, as it is known that the production-based principle is employed in the Kyoto agreement. The research described herein was designed to reveal the interdependence of countries on international trade and the corresponding embodied emissions both on national and on sectoral level and to illustrate the significance of the consumption-based emission accounting. It is presented here to what extent a consumption-based accounting would change the present system based on production-based accounting and allocation. The relationship of CO2 emission embodied in exports and embodied in imports is analysed here. International trade can blur the responsibility for the ecological effects of production and consumption and it can lengthen the link between consumption and its consequences. Input–output models are used in the methodology as they provide an appropriate framework for climate change accounting. The analysis comprises an international comparative study of four European countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Hungary) with extended trading activities and carbon emissions. Moving from a production-based approach in climate policy to a consumption-based principle and allocation approach would help to increase the efficiency of emission reductions and would force countries to rethink their trading activities in order to decrease the environmental load of production activities. The results of this study show that it is important to distinguish between the two emission accounting approaches, both on the global and the local level.

[1]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  A socio‐metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another Great Transformation , 2011 .

[2]  Chuanwang Sun,et al.  Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China , 2010 .

[3]  Nawshad Haque,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations , 2010 .

[4]  Mária Csete,et al.  Climate and Energy Policy in Hungary , 2012 .

[5]  Jiahua Pan,et al.  China's balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility , 2008 .

[6]  A. Inaba,et al.  Comparison of “CO2 efficiency” between company and industry , 2005 .

[7]  W. Leontief.  Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach , 1970 .

[8]  Paul Ekins.  From Green GNP to the Sustainability Gap: recent Developments in national environmental economic Accounting , 2001 .

[9]  A. Steenge.  Input–output theory and institutional aspects of environmental policy , 1999 .

[10]  Bernadette O'Regan,et al.  Valuation of ecological impacts ¿ a regional approach using the ecological footprint concept , 2006 .

[11]  J. Minx,et al.  Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis , 2006 .

[12]  P. Victor.  Pollution: Economy and Environment , 1972 .

[13]  H. Schütz,et al.  Globalisation and the shifting environmental burden : material trade flows of the European Union ; which globalisation is sustainable? , 2004 .

[14]  G. Sinden,et al.  The contribution of PAS 2050 to the evolution of international greenhouse gas emission standards , 2009 .

[15]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Trade, transport, and sinks extend the carbon dioxide responsibility of countries: An editorial essay , 2009 .

[16]  Jiun-Jiun Ferng,et al.  Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints , 2002 .

[17]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Structural analysis of international trade: Environmental impacts of Norway , 2006 .

[18]  H. Haberl,et al.  Global Environmental Change and Historical Transitions , 2001 .

[19]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  R. Prebisch.  Towards a dynamic development policy for Latin America , 1963 .

[21]  M. Mazzanti,et al.  Linking NAMEA and Input output for ‘consumption vs. production perspective’ analyses , 2012 .

[22]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Socioecological Transitions and Global Change , 2007 .

[23]  I. Walter.  THE POLLUTION CONTENT OF AMERICAN TRADE , 1973 .

[24]  Jesper Munksgaard,et al.  CO2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility? , 2001 .

[25]  R. Schultes.  Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, unequal exchange and the failure of the modern state , 2008, Economic Botany.

[26]  K. Noorman,et al.  Assessing the energy intensities of imports , 1998 .

[27]  Heinz Schandl,et al.  The Global Sociometabolic Transition , 2008 .

[28]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  Indicators of sustainability , 2004 .

[29]  M. Saier,et al.  Climate Change, 2007 , 2007 .

[30]  T. Mattila,et al.  Impacts of international trade on carbon flows of forest industry in Finland , 2011 .

[31]  Raymond R. Tan,et al.  A graphical representation of carbon footprint reduction for chemical processes , 2010 .

[32]  J. Martínez-Alier.  Distributional Obstacles to International Environmental Policy: The Failures at Rio and Prospects after Rio1 , 1993, Environmental Values.

[33]  Yan Yunfeng,et al.  China's foreign trade and climate change: A case study of CO2 emissions , 2010 .

[34]  Yuichi Moriguchi,et al.  CO2 Emissions in Japan: Influences of imports and exports , 1998 .

[35]  R. Marschinski,et al.  Should carbon-exporting countries strive for consumption-based accounting in a global cap-and-trade regime? , 2010 .

[36]  V. M. Malhotra.  Reducing CO~2 Emissions , 2006 .

[37]  Mariano Torras,et al.  An Ecological Footprint Approach to External Debt Relief , 2003 .

[38]  J. Munksgaard,et al.  Using Input‐Output Analysis to Measure the Environmental Pressure of Consumption at Different Spatial Levels , 2005 .

[39]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[40]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress , 2011 .

[41]  J. Minx,et al.  A definition of “carbon footprint” , 2010 .

[42]  Paul Ekins,et al.  Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability: The Prospects for Green Growth , 1999 .

[43]  Jan Otto Andersson,et al.  Ecologically unsustainable trade , 2001 .

[44]  James Rice,et al.  Structural Dynamics of International Trade and Material Consumption: A Cross-National Study of the Ecological Footprints of Less-Developed Countries , 2005 .

[45]  M. Fischer-Kowalski,et al.  Beyond IPAT and Kuznets Curves: Globalization as a Vital Factor in Analysing the Environmental Impact of Socio-Economic Metabolism , 2001 .

[46]  Joan Martinez-Alier,et al.  Trade and the environment: from a ‘Southern’ perspective , 2001 .

[47]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[48]  W. Leontief.  Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States , 1936 .

[49]  Climate or rural development policy , 2011 .

[50]  M. Finkbeiner.  Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats , 2009 .

[51]  James Rice,et al.  Ecological Unequal Exchange: Consumption, Equity, and Unsustainable Structural Relationships within the Global Economy , 2007 .

[52]  F. M. Pulselli,et al.  The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions , 2004 .

[53]  Gerhard Wagenhals,et al.  Reducing CO2 Emissions , 1993 .

[54]  Juan Martínez Alier,et al.  The environmentalism of the poor : a study of ecological conflicts and valuation , 2002 .

[55]  Andrew Wyckoff,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Emissions Embodied in International Trade of Goods , 2003 .

[56]  Sven-Olof Ryding,et al.  The carbon footprint measurement toolkit for the EU Ecolabel , 2009 .

[57]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[58]  Christophe Rynikiewicz,et al.  The climate change challenge and transitions for radical changes in the European steel industry , 2008 .

[59]  G. Peters.  From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories , 2008 .

[60]  G. Peters,et al.  APPROXIMATION AND REGIONAL AGGREGATION IN MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS FOR NATIONAL CARBON FOOTPRINT ACCOUNTING , 2009 .

[61]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Answers to common questions in Ecological Footprint accounting , 2009 .

[62]  M. Lenzen.  Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input–output analysis , 1998 .

[63]  Stefan Giljum,et al.  North-South Trade and the Distribution of Environmental Goods and Burdens: a Biophysical Perspective , 2004 .

[64]  Robert A. Herendeen,et al.  Energy cost of living , 1976 .

[65]  Edeltraud Guenther,et al.  Carbon accounting: a systematic literature review , 2012 .

[66]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Sustainable development: socio‐economic metabolism and colonization of nature , 1998 .

[67]  Gene Bazan.  Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[68]  Mária Csete,et al.  Modeling methodologies of synergic effects related to climate change and sustainable energy management , 2010 .

[69]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  The Environmental Performance Strategy Map: an integrated LCA approach to support the strategic decision-making process , 2009 .

[70]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed Ecological Footprint and biological capacity assessments , 2004 .

[71]  Bertrand Hamaide.  Industrial Output Restriction and the Kyoto Protocol: An Input-Output Approach with Application to Canada , 2007 .

[72]  J. Cumberland,et al.  A regional interindustry model for analysis of development objectives , 1966 .

[73]  J. Minx,et al.  INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS , 2009 .

[74]  H. Singer.  The Strategy of International Development , 1975 .

[75]  Dagmar Schröter,et al.  Socioecological transitions and global change: trajectories of social metabolism and land use , 2009 .

[76]  T. Wiedmann.  EDITORIAL: CARBON FOOTPRINT AND INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS – AN INTRODUCTION , 2009 .

[77]  Alf Hornborg,et al.  The Power of the Machine: Global Inequalities of Economy, Technology, and Environment , 2001 .

[78]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Tons, joules, and money: Modes of production and their sustainability problems , 1997 .

[79]  Eric C. Jones,et al.  The Power of the Machine: Global Inequalities of Economy, Technology, and Environment , 2005 .

[80]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Status quo and challenges , 2012 .

[81]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Macroeconomic Measures of ‘Sustainability’ , 2000 .