A consistent modelling methodology for secondary settling tanks in wastewater treatment.

The aim of this contribution is partly to build consensus on a consistent modelling methodology (CMM) of complex real processes in wastewater treatment by combining classical concepts with results from applied mathematics, and partly to apply it to the clarification-thickening process in the secondary settling tank. In the CMM, the real process should be approximated by a mathematical model (process model; ordinary or partial differential equation (ODE or PDE)), which in turn is approximated by a simulation model (numerical method) implemented on a computer. These steps have often not been carried out in a correct way. The secondary settling tank was chosen as a case since this is one of the most complex processes in a wastewater treatment plant and simulation models developed decades ago have no guarantee of satisfying fundamental mathematical and physical properties. Nevertheless, such methods are still used in commercial tools to date. This particularly becomes of interest as the state-of-the-art practice is moving towards plant-wide modelling. Then all submodels interact and errors propagate through the model and severely hamper any calibration effort and, hence, the predictive purpose of the model. The CMM is described by applying it first to a simple conversion process in the biological reactor yielding an ODE solver, and then to the solid-liquid separation in the secondary settling tank, yielding a PDE solver. Time has come to incorporate established mathematical techniques into environmental engineering, and wastewater treatment modelling in particular, and to use proven reliable and consistent simulation models.

[1]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Shall we upgrade one-dimensional secondary settler models in WWTP simulators? , 2010 .

[2]  K. Hoen,et al.  Modelling and simulation of final clarifiers in wastewater treatment plants , 1995 .

[3]  René Dupont,et al.  A one-dimensional model for a secondary settling tank including density current and short-circuiting , 1995 .

[4]  L. Härtel,et al.  A Dynamic Secondary Clarifier Model including Processes of Sludge Thickening , 1992 .

[5]  Gerasimos Lyberatos,et al.  Modeling and Pilot-Scale Experimental Verification for Predenitrification Process , 1992 .

[6]  Ilse Smets,et al.  SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF A ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONVECTION-DIFFUSION MODEL FOR SECONDARY SETTLING TANKS , 2004 .

[7]  I. Takács A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process , 1991 .

[8]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Extending and calibrating a mechanistic hindered and compression settling model for activated sludge using in-depth batch experiments. , 2008, Water research.

[9]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Analysis and simulation of the sludge profile dynamics in a full-scale clarifier , 2005 .

[10]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  An evaluation of a dynamic model of the secondary clarifier , 1996 .

[11]  James L. Barnard,et al.  Secondary settling tanks : theory, modelling, design and operation , 1997 .

[12]  Stefan Diehl,et al.  A conservation Law with Point Source and Discontinuous Flux Function Modelling Continuous Sedimentation , 1996, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[13]  W. Gujer,et al.  Systems Analysis for Water Technology , 2008 .

[14]  Christopher G. Uchrin,et al.  Modeling and simulation of compressive gravity thickening of activated sludge , 1989 .

[15]  Peter J. Scales,et al.  The characterisation of slurry dewatering , 2000 .

[16]  K. Keesman,et al.  Dynamic modeling of sludge compaction and consolidation processes in wastewater secondary settling tanks. , 2009, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[17]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Mathematical models in teaching and training: mismatch between education and requirements for jobs , 2008 .

[18]  Raimund Bürger,et al.  Steady-state, control, and capacity calculations for flocculated suspensions in clarifier–thickeners , 2007 .

[19]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Wastewater treatment models in teaching and training: the mismatch between education and requirements for jobs. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  Raimund Bürger,et al.  A Model of Continuous Sedimentation of Flocculated Suspensions in Clarifier-Thickener Units , 2005, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[21]  David M. Bagley,et al.  Dynamic Model for Zone Settling and Compression in Gravity Thickeners , 1998 .

[22]  J. D. Clercq,et al.  Batch and continuous settling of activated sludge: in-depth monitoring and 1D compression modelling , 2006 .

[23]  Youngchul Kim,et al.  A simple empirical model for activated sludge thickening in secondary clarifiers. , 2002, Water research.

[24]  R. Otterpohl,et al.  Dynamic Models for Clarifiers of Activated Sludge Plants with Dry and Wet Weather Flows , 1992 .

[25]  Witold Nocon Mathematical modelling of distributed feed in continuous sedimentation , 2006, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[26]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Shall we upgrade one-dimensional secondary settler models used in WWTP simulators? - An assessment of model structure uncertainty and its propagation. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[27]  Stefan Diehl,et al.  The solids-flux theory--confirmation and extension by using partial differential equations. , 2008, Water research.

[28]  Michael Knudson Stenstrom,et al.  A DYNAMIC MODEL AND COMPUTER COMPATIBLE CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS , 1976 .

[29]  Raimund Bürger,et al.  Applications of the phenomenological theory to several published experimental cases of sedimentation processes , 2000 .

[30]  Ross G. de Kretser,et al.  Rapid filtration measurement of dewatering design and optimization parameters , 2001 .

[31]  G. J. Kynch A theory of sedimentation , 1952 .

[32]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 , 2015 .

[33]  Stefan Diehl,et al.  A uniqueness condition for nonlinear convection-diffusion equations with discontinuous coefficients , 2009 .

[34]  Benedek Gy Plósz,et al.  One-dimensional modelling of the secondary clarifier-factors affecting simulation in the clarification zone and the assessment of the thickening flow dependence. , 2007, Water research.

[35]  Stefan Diehl,et al.  Estimation of the batch-settling flux function for an ideal suspension from only two experiments , 2007 .

[36]  R B Newell,et al.  Advances in distributed parameter approach to the dynamics and control of activated sludge processes for wastewater treatment. , 2006, Water research.

[37]  John D. Towers,et al.  Well-posedness in BVt and convergence of a difference scheme for continuous sedimentation in ideal clarifier-thickener units , 2004, Numerische Mathematik.

[38]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  A new one-dimensional clarifier model--verification using full-scale experimental data. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[39]  P. Chatellier,et al.  A new model for wastewater treatment plant clarifier simulation , 2000 .

[40]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  On the modelling of the dynamic propagation of biological components in the secondary clarifier , 1996 .

[41]  Stefan Diehl,et al.  Operating charts for continuous sedimentation I: Control of steady states , 2001 .

[42]  I Queinnec,et al.  Modelling and simulation of the steady-state of secondary settlers in wastewater treatment plants. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[43]  R. Bürger,et al.  Settling velocities of particulate systems: 11. Comparison of the phenomenological sedimentation–consolidation model with published experimental results , 1999 .

[44]  J. Storch,et al.  A Simple Empirical Model for Decadal Climate Prediction , 2011 .

[45]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Modelling of the Secondary Clarifier Combined with the Activated Sludge Model No. 1 , 1992 .

[46]  J. Ph. Chancelier,et al.  Analysis of a Conservation PDE With Discontinuous Flux: A Model of Settler , 1994, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[47]  A. Vande Wouwer,et al.  Settler dynamic modeling and MATLAB simulation of the activated sludge process , 2009 .

[48]  S. Svoronos,et al.  One-dimensional modeling of secondary clarifiers using a concentration and feed velocity-dependent dispersion coefficient , 1996 .

[49]  A Vande Wouwer,et al.  Modeling and numerical simulation of secondary settlers: a method of lines strategy. , 2009, Water research.

[50]  Raimund Bürger,et al.  Model equations for gravitational sedimentation-consolidation processes , 2000 .

[51]  Moshe Sheintuch,et al.  Steady state analysis of a continuous clarifier‐thickener system , 1986 .

[52]  Alison Emslie Ozinsky Mathematical simulation of dynamic behaviour of secondary settling tanks , 1993 .

[53]  W. Gujer,et al.  Activated sludge model No. 3 , 1995 .

[54]  R. LeVeque Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems: Characteristics and Riemann Problems for Linear Hyperbolic Equations , 2002 .

[55]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  A model of the settler coupled to the biological reactor , 1998 .

[56]  K. Karlsen,et al.  A mathematical model for batch and continuous thickening of flocculated suspensions in vessels with varying cross-section , 2004 .