Photoacoustic and filter-based ambient aerosol light absorption measurements : Instrument comparisons and the role of relative humidity

[1] Ambient measurements are reported of aerosol light absorption from photoacoustic and filter-based instruments (aethalometer and a particle soot absorption photometer (PSAP)) to provide insight on the measurement science. Measurements were obtained during the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational Study at the Big Bend National Park in South Texas. The aethalometer measurements of black carbon concentration at this site correlate reasonably well with photoacoustic measurements of aerosol light absorption, with a slope of 8.1 m2/g and a small offset. Light absorption at this site never exceeded 2.1 Mm−1 during the month of collocated measurements. Measurements were also obtained, as a function of controlled relative humidity between 40% and 90%, during the Photoacoustic IOP in 2000 at the Department of Energy Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed site (SGP). PSAP measurements of aerosol light absorption correlated very well with photoacoustic measurements, but the slope of the correlation indicated the PSAP values were larger by a factor of 1.61. The photoacoustic measurements of light absorption exhibited a systematic decrease when the RH increased beyond 70%. This apparent decrease in light absorption with RH may be due to the contribution of mass transfer to the photoacoustic signal. Model results for the limiting case of full water saturation are used to evaluate this hypothesis. A second PSAP measured the light absorption for the same humidified samples, and indicated very erratic response as the RH changed, suggesting caution when interpreting PSAP data under conditions of rapid relative humidity change.

[1]  James G. Hudson,et al.  Evaluation of aerosol direct radiative forcing in MIRAGE , 2001 .

[2]  T. Novakov,et al.  The aethalometer — An instrument for the real-time measurement of optical absorption by aerosol particles , 1983 .

[3]  H. Horvath.  Atmospheric light absorption : a review , 1993 .

[4]  A. Chughtai,et al.  Hydration of black carbon , 1996 .

[5]  N. Miller,et al.  Carbonaceous Particle Hydration III , 1999 .

[6]  P. Griffiths,et al.  Photoacoustics and Photoacoustic Spectroscopy , 1981 .

[7]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  The dri thermal/optical reflectance carbon analysis system: description, evaluation and applications in U.S. Air quality studies , 1993 .

[8]  R. Harrison,et al.  The optical properties and morphology of cloud-processed carbonaceous smoke , 1990 .

[9]  H. Brink.  Reactive uptake of HNO3 and H2SO4 in sea-salt (NaCl) particles , 1998 .

[10]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Calibration and Intercomparison of Filter-Based Measurements of Visible Light Absorption by Aerosols , 1999 .

[11]  B. A. Bodhaine,et al.  Aerosol absorption measurements at Barrow, Mauna Loa and the south pole , 1995 .

[12]  J. Coakley,et al.  Climate Forcing by Anthropogenic Aerosols , 1992, Science.

[13]  Richard Raspet,et al.  Evaporation–Condensation Effects on Resonant Photoacoustics of Volatile Aerosols , 2003 .

[14]  Robert J. Charlson,et al.  A Study of the Relationship of Chemical Composition and Humidity to Light Scattering by Aerosols , 1972 .

[15]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Photoacoustic and filter measurements related to aerosol light absorption during the Northern Front Range Air Quality Study (Colorado 1996/1997) , 1998 .

[16]  Meinrat O. Andreae,et al.  The dark side of aerosols , 2001, Nature.

[17]  Reinhard Niessner,et al.  Photoacoustic soot sensor for in-situ black carbon monitoring , 1996 .

[18]  Derek E. Day,et al.  Aerosol light scattering measurements as a function of relative humidity : a comparison between measurements made at three different sites , 2001 .

[19]  C. H. Chan,et al.  Effective absorption for thermal blooming due to aerosols , 1975 .

[20]  K. M. Adams,et al.  Real-time in situ measurements of atmospheric optical absorption in the visible via photoacoustic spectroscopy. 1: Evaluation of photoacoustic cells. , 1988, Applied optics.

[21]  P. Buseck,et al.  Absorbing Phenomena , 2000, Science.

[22]  J F Collins,et al.  Time-resolved characterization of diesel particulate emissions. 2. Instruments for elemental and organic carbon measurements. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Ronald G. Pinnick,et al.  Aerosol in the arid southwestern United States: Measurements of mass loading, volatility, size distribution, absorption characteristics, black carbon content, and vertical structure to 7 km above sea level , 1993 .

[24]  Reinhard F. Bruch,et al.  Photoacoustic spectrometer for measuring light absorption by aerosol: instrument description , 1999 .

[25]  S. Schwartz,et al.  The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program: Programmatic Background and Design of the Cloud and Radiation Test Bed , 1994 .

[26]  H. Horvath,et al.  Experimental calibration for aerosol light absorption measurements using the integrating plate method—Summary of the data , 1997 .

[27]  W. Patrick Arnott,et al.  Nitrogen dioxide and kerosene-flame soot calibration of photoacoustic instruments for measurement of light absorption by aerosols , 2000 .

[28]  J. Ogren,et al.  Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer , 1998 .

[29]  P. Hamill,et al.  Dependence of Aerosol Light Absorption and Single-Scattering Albedo On Ambient Relative Humidity for Sulfate Aerosols with Black Carbon Cores , 2001 .

[30]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  The Indian Ocean Experiment: Widespread Air Pollution from South and Southeast Asia , 2001, Science.

[31]  William R. Harshbarger,et al.  Opto-acoustic effect. Revival of an old technique for molecular spectroscopy , 1973 .

[32]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Reduction of tropical cloudiness by soot , 2000, Science.

[33]  Steve Granick,et al.  Hydrophobicity at a Janus Interface , 2002, Science.

[34]  P. Chylek,et al.  Effect of Graphitic Carbon on the Albedo of Clouds , 1984 .

[35]  H. Burtscher,et al.  Hygroscopic properties of carbon and diesel soot particles , 1997 .

[36]  G. R. Williams,et al.  Carbonaceous particle hydration , 1999 .

[37]  Tim Elliott,et al.  Four Years of Continuous Surface Aerosol Measurements from the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed Site , 2022 .

[38]  J. Sabatier,et al.  The effect of evaporation-condensation on sound propagation in cylindrical tubes using the low reduced frequency approximation , 1999 .

[39]  J. Ogren,et al.  Four years of continuous surface aerosol measurements from the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed site , 2001 .

[40]  K. M. Adams,et al.  Development of a MnO2-coated, cylindrical denuder for removing NO2 from atmospheric samples , 1986 .

[41]  Ulrike Lohmann,et al.  Can the direct and semi‐direct aerosol effect compete with the indirect effect on a global scale? , 2001 .

[42]  R. E. Danielson,et al.  The Transfer of Visible Radiation through Clouds , 1969 .

[43]  M. Baker,et al.  Energy absorption by volatile atmospheric aerosol particles , 1976 .

[44]  K. M. Adams,et al.  REAL-TIME, IN SITU MEASUREMENTS OF ATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL ABSORPTION IN THE VISIBLE VIA PHOTOACOUSTIC SPECTROSCOPY--IV. VISIBILITY DEGRADATION AND AEROSOL OPTICAL PROPERTIES IN LOS ANGELES* , 1990 .