Seismic retrofit options for non-structural building partition walls: impact on loss estimation and cost-benefit analysis

Abstract The importance of non-structural components in building performance under seismic action is well recognized in the scientific community. Damage to residential buildings registered in past earthquakes has demonstrated that the damage to non-structural components represents a substantial percentage to the resulting economic losses. In the context of performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE), the probabilistic estimation of building-specific losses has highlighted the importance of non-structural walls, in particular, due to their direct influence on building response and contribution to the overall damage. However, limited research has been produced on the subject of seismic retrofit of non-structural components and their economic advantages. In this manuscript, focus is given to non-structural partition walls, with the aim of determining the potential economic benefit of implementing non-structural retrofit solutions, in terms of the corresponding reduction in average annual earthquake losses. Building on an extensive literature review on the state-of-the-art of non-structural retrofit solutions, representative retrofit options are investigated for six combinations of building class and seismic hazard at the building location (in Italy), by means of probabilistic seismic loss estimation and corresponding cost-benefit analysis. The results show that the seismic retrofit of non-structural partition walls only (as opposed to retrofitting both structural and non-structural components) can be sufficient to achieve a reduction of seismic losses that guarantees the return of the retrofit investment during the building’s life cycle, specifically when dealing with highly vulnerable buildings located in regions of high seismicity.

[1]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Seismic response and design of RC structures with plan‐eccentric masonry infills , 1999 .

[2]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Expected earthquake damage and repair costs in reinforced concrete frame buildings , 2012 .

[3]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Shake‐table experiment on reinforced concrete structure containing masonry infill wall , 2006 .

[4]  M. Elgaaly,et al.  Seismic Retrofit of Concrete-Masonry-Infilled Steel Frames with Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Laminates , 2004 .

[5]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Infills in Seismic Resistant Building , 1983 .

[6]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis of Alternative Retrofit Strategies for RC Frame Buildings , 2019 .

[7]  Ali M. Memari,et al.  Analysis of masonry infilled steel frames with seismic isolator subframes , 2005 .

[8]  Keiichiro Suita,et al.  Seismic performance evaluation of non‐structural components: drywall partitions , 2007 .

[9]  Eleni Smyrou,et al.  FRP Strengthened Brick-Infilled RC Frames: An Approach for their Proper Consideration in Design , 2012 .

[10]  Turan Özturan,et al.  Seismic Strengthening of Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frames with Composite Materials , 2011 .

[11]  Humberto Varum,et al.  Hazard Disaggregation and Record Selection for Fragility Analysis and Earthquake Loss Estimation , 2017 .

[12]  A. Elwi,et al.  Strengthening of Unreinforced Masonry Walls Using FRPs , 2001 .

[13]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Seismic Design and Response of Bare and Masonry-Infilled Reinforced Concrete Buildings Part II: Infilled Structures , 1997 .

[14]  B. Bradley.  A generalized conditional intensity measure approach and holistic ground‐motion selection , 2010 .

[15]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Experimental Seismic Fragility of Steel Studded Gypsum Partition Walls and Fire Sprinkler Piping Subsystems , 2010 .

[16]  R. Park,et al.  Stress-Strain Behavior of Concrete Confined by Overlapping Hoops at Low and High Strain Rates , 1982 .

[17]  Kurt M. McMullin,et al.  Seismic Damage Thresholds for Gypsum Wallboard Partition Walls , 2007 .

[18]  Sanja Hak,et al.  Damage Control for Clay Masonry Infills in the Design of RC Frame Structures , 2012 .

[19]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Irregularities induced by nonstructural masonry panels in framed buildings , 1997 .

[20]  Halûk Sucuoğlu.  Implications of Masonry Infill and Partition Damage in Performance Perception in Residential Buildings after a Moderate Earthquake , 2013 .

[21]  S. Billington,et al.  Cyclic Response of Nonductile Reinforced Concrete Frames with Unreinforced Masonry Infills Retrofitted with Engineered Cementitious Composites , 2014 .

[22]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Effect of Infills on the Global Behaviour of R/C Frames. Energy Considerations from Pseudodynamic Tests , 1996 .

[23]  M. Mohammadi,et al.  Methods to Improve Infilled Frame Ductility , 2011 .

[24]  Helen Crowley,et al.  On the treatment of uncertainties in the development of fragility functions for earthquake loss estimation of building portfolios , 2016 .

[25]  Carlo Meletti,et al.  The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model: key components and results , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[26]  Baris Binici,et al.  Analysis and design of FRP composites for seismic retrofit of infill walls in reinforced concrete frames , 2007 .

[27]  Francesca da Porto,et al.  Performance of masonry buildings during the Emilia 2012 earthquake , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[28]  T. Paulay,et al.  Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings , 1992 .

[29]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Seismic performance evaluation of plasterboard partitions via shake table tests , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[30]  Athol J. Carr,et al.  Analytical modelling of infilled frame structures , 2000 .

[31]  Ali M. Memari,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a sacrificial seismic fuse device for masonry infill walls , 2007 .

[32]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Earthquake Resistance of Infilled Frames , 1978 .

[33]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis , 2015 .

[34]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data , 2003 .

[35]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Damage and Loss Assessment of Pre-70 RC Frame Buildings with FEMA P-58 , 2017 .

[36]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Developing fragility curves and loss functions for masonry infill walls , 2015 .

[37]  Andreas Stavridis,et al.  Shake‐table tests of a three‐story reinforced concrete frame with masonry infill walls , 2012 .

[38]  Andrew Charleson,et al.  Seismic design for architects , 2008 .

[39]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Experimental Seismic Fragility of Cold-Formed Steel Framed Gypsum Partition Walls , 2013 .

[40]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Performance of Buildings , 2000 .

[41]  Santiago Pujol,et al.  The test of a full-scale three-story RC structure with masonry infill walls , 2010 .

[42]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[43]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Fragility curves and loss functions for RC structural components with smooth rebars , 2016 .

[44]  Steven L. Kramer,et al.  Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Liquefaction Hazard Evaluation , 2006 .

[45]  F. Filippou,et al.  Mixed formulation of nonlinear beam finite element , 1996 .

[46]  Carlos Marcelo Ramirez.  Building-specific loss estimation methods & tools for simplified performance-based earthquake engineering , 2009 .

[47]  P. Lestuzzi,et al.  STATIC CYCLIC RESPONSE OF MASONRY WALLS RETROFITTED WITH FIBER-REINFORCED POLYMERS , 2007 .

[48]  T. Almusallam,et al.  Behavior of FRP Strengthened Infill Walls under In-Plane Seismic Loading , 2007 .

[49]  Gian Michele Calvi.  Choices and Criteria for Seismic Strengthening , 2013 .

[50]  C. Valente,et al.  Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems , 2005 .

[51]  Pierino Lestuzzi,et al.  In-Plane Seismic Response of URM Walls Upgraded with FRP , 2005 .

[52]  T. Triantafillou,et al.  Seismic strengthening of masonry-infilled RC frames with TRM: Experimental study , 2015 .

[53]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Low damage seismic solutions for non-structural drywall partitions , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.