Pricing models of two-sided markets incorporating service quality

Purpose This paper aims to study the pricing problems on the two-sided market for cases of monopoly and duopoly competition, specifically investigating the impact of platform service quality on the market. Theoretical analysis and computational studies are conducted to investigate the impact of different parameters on the system outcomes. Design/methodology/approach Mathematical formulations are proposed for cases of monopoly and duopoly competition. For monopolistic market, the optimal pricing and service quality strategies are obtained using mathematical programming method. For duopolistic market, the equilibrium outcomes are derived by game theory. Sensitivity analysis and numerical studies are also adopted to investigate the impact of different parameters. Findings For monopolistic market, the platform will provide a low service quality when the service cost parameter is large. However, when the cost parameter is small, the platform provides a higher service quality and higher registration prices. Furthermore, the sum of the optimal prices is proportional to the service quality and inversely proportional to the user price sensitivity. For duopolistic market, the competitive equilibrium prices exist under a certain condition. The determinants of equilibrium prices are the gap between the service qualities of two platforms and the cross-group externalities. Originality/value For monopolistic market, this paper specifies the role of platform service quality in determining the platform’s pricing strategy. For duopolistic market, this paper presents a market sharing mechanism between two platforms and explores the equilibrium pricing strategies for platforms with different service quality level.

[1]  Miguel González-Maestre,et al.  Quality choice and advertising regulation in broadcasting markets , 2015 .

[2]  N. Nohria,et al.  Are leaders portable? , 2006, Harvard business review.

[3]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[4]  Markus Reisinger Platform Competition for Advertisers and Users in Media Markets , 2011 .

[5]  Soulaymane Kachani,et al.  Competitive Pricing in a Multi‐Product Multi‐Attribute Environment , 2011 .

[6]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[7]  T. Gruca,et al.  Industrial Pricing: Theory and Managerial Practice , 1999 .

[8]  Andrei Hagiu Pricing and commitment by two‐sided platforms , 2006 .

[9]  Xudong Lin,et al.  Value-added service investment strategy of a two-sided platform with the negative intra-group network externality , 2018, Kybernetes.

[10]  Albert Y. Ha,et al.  Quality in Supply Chain Encroachment , 2016, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[11]  Hai Yang,et al.  Pricing strategies for a taxi-hailing platform , 2016 .

[12]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[13]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Innovation and Price Competition in a Two-Sided Market , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  D. Wu,et al.  Regulating platform competition in two-sided markets under the O2O era , 2017, International Journal of Production Economics.

[15]  Helmuth Cremer,et al.  Competition in Two-Sided Markets with Common Network Externalities , 2009 .

[16]  Ping He,et al.  One-side value-added service investment and pricing strategies for a two-sided platform , 2016 .

[17]  Guillaume Roger,et al.  Two-sided competition with vertical differentiation , 2016, Journal of Economics.

[18]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[19]  Jean-Charles Rochet,et al.  Credit Card Interchange Fees , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  Y. Narahari,et al.  Game Theoretic Problems in Network Economics and Mechanism Design Solutions , 2009, Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing.

[21]  Gueyoung Jung,et al.  CloudAdvisor: A Recommendation-as-a-Service Platform for Cloud Configuration and Pricing , 2013, 2013 IEEE Ninth World Congress on Services.

[22]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly , 1988 .

[23]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Economics of an Information Intermediary with Aggregation Benefits , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Byoungho Jin,et al.  The role of etail quality, e-satisfaction and e-trust in online loyalty development process , 2009 .

[25]  W. Baumol,et al.  Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[26]  M. Armstrong,et al.  Two-sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts , 2004 .

[27]  Ling-Chieh Kung,et al.  The Optimal Pricing Strategy for Two-Sided Platform Delivery In the Sharing Economy , 2017 .

[28]  Massimo Motta,et al.  Endogenous Quality Choice: Price vs. Quantity Competition , 1993 .

[29]  Pierre Gaze,et al.  Electronic platforms and two-sided markets: A side-switching analysis☆ , 2011 .

[30]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[31]  Hai Jin,et al.  Towards Optimized Fine-Grained Pricing of IaaS Cloud Platform , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing.

[32]  Jean Jaskold Gabszewicz,et al.  Intermarket network externalities and competition : an application to the media industry , 2008 .

[33]  B. Caillaud,et al.  Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers , 2003 .

[34]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Two-Sided Platforms: Pricing and Social Efficiency , 2004 .

[35]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Network Economics with Application to Finance , 1993 .

[36]  Bing Jing,et al.  Network externalities and market segmentation in a monopoly , 2007 .