Coupling X-ray microtomography and mercury intrusion porosimetry to quantify aggregate structures of a cambisol under different fertilisation treatments

Abstract The description of soil structure is primordial to determine the effects of management practices on soil environment. Different techniques were developed to determine the pore structure, each with its own limitations. In this study mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) and X-ray microtomography (micro-CT) were used to study the total porosity and pore size distribution of soil aggregates (5–6 mm) treated with different fertilisations (organic, mixed and mineral). The network model Pore-Cor was applied to pore distribution curves to highlight subtle structural properties affecting the aggregates. The combination of these techniques highlighted that: (1) MIP was fundamental to reveal the small pores that were not detected by micro-CT and that represented up to 70% of total porosity; (2) micropores (30–6.25 μm) detected by MIP were underestimated with respect to micro-CT (−9.4%) probably due to the “ink bottle” effect, whereas meso- and macropores were overestimated; (3) only micro-CT highlighted the effects of organic amendants on pore morphology. These outcomes were compared with modelling results of the network model Pore-Cor that proved its ability to predict the pore structure organisation and the differences between fertilisations. Further improvement of micro-CT will allow to cover a wider range of pores, but at present the integration with different techniques is still fundamental.

[1]  Gabriel I. Tardos,et al.  Use of X-ray tomography to study the porosity and morphology of granules , 2003 .

[2]  A. Walkley,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE DEGTJAREFF METHOD FOR DETERMINING SOIL ORGANIC MATTER, AND A PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE CHROMIC ACID TITRATION METHOD , 1934 .

[3]  John Doe,et al.  Soil Map of the World , 1962 .

[4]  Thomas Baumgartl,et al.  Soil physical properties related to soil structure , 1994 .

[5]  G. P. Lawrence.  STABILITY OF SOIL PORES DURING MERCURY INTRUSION POROSIMETRY , 1978 .

[6]  V. Cnudde,et al.  Porosity and microstructure characterization of building stones and concretes , 2009 .

[7]  P. Schjønning,et al.  Pore characteristics and hydraulic properties of a sandy loam supplied for a century with either animal manure or mineral fertilizers , 2005 .

[8]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[9]  S. Mooney,et al.  Investigating the effects of organic and conventional management on soil aggregate stability using X‐ray computed tomography , 2009 .

[10]  Guido Rademaker,et al.  Detection of soil water in macropores of undisturbed soil using microfocus X-ray tube computerized tomography (μCT) , 2009 .

[11]  Catherine S. Morris,et al.  VISUALIZATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF THE EFFECTS OF CEREAL ROOT LODGING ON THREE-DIMENSIONAL SOIL MACROSTRUCTURE USING X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY , 2006 .

[12]  V. Hallaire,et al.  Pore morphology changes under tillage and no-tillage practices , 2007 .

[13]  David J. Chittleborough,et al.  3D‐visualization and analysis of macro‐ and meso‐porosity of the upper horizons of a sodic, texture‐contrast soil , 2007 .

[14]  R. Angulo-Jaramillo,et al.  Pore gas connectivity analysis in Callovo-Oxfordian argillite , 2008 .

[15]  F. Bartoli,et al.  The relation between silty soil structures and their mercury porosimetry curve counterparts: fractals and percolation , 1999 .

[16]  E. Lugato,et al.  Relationship between aggregate pore size distribution and organic–humic carbon in contrasting soils , 2009 .

[17]  E. Petticrew,et al.  Aggregate stability in organically and conventionally farmed soils , 2009 .

[18]  G. Matthews,et al.  Measurement and simulation of the effect of compaction on the pore structure and saturated hydraulic conductivity of grassland and arable soil , 2010 .

[19]  P. Hallett,et al.  Disentangling the impact of AM fungi versus roots on soil structure and water transport , 2008, Plant and Soil.

[20]  R. Mann,et al.  Characterization of microstructural anisotropy in orthotropic materials using a second rank tensor , 1984 .

[21]  L. Aylmore,et al.  The use of computer-assisted tomography to determine spatial distribution of soil water content , 1983 .

[22]  N. Ferro,et al.  DRIFT and HR MAS NMR characterization of humic substances from a soil treated with different organic and mineral fertilizers , 2011 .

[23]  David A Lange,et al.  Image analysis techniques for characterization of pore structure of cement-based materials , 1994 .

[24]  P. Jacobs,et al.  Applications of X-ray computed tomography in the geosciences , 2003, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[25]  A. Ringrose-Voase.  Measurement of soil macropore geometry by image analysis of sections through impregnated soil , 1996, Plant and Soil.

[26]  C. Chenu,et al.  The effects of organic inputs over time on soil aggregate stability – a literature analysis , 2009 .

[27]  A. Berti,et al.  Soil organic matter properties after 40 years of different use of organic and mineral fertilisers , 2004 .

[28]  Pete Smith,et al.  Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe , 2004 .

[29]  H. Riesemeier,et al.  Rock porosity determination by combination of X-ray computerized tomography with mercury porosimetry , 1997 .

[30]  G. Matthews,et al.  Measurement and simulation of void structure and hydraulic changes caused by root-induced soil structuring under white clover compared to ryegrass , 2007 .

[31]  J. Tisdall,et al.  Organic matter and water‐stable aggregates in soils , 1982 .

[32]  F. Skjøth,et al.  Tillage caused dispersion of phosphorus and soil in four 16-year old field experiments , 2000 .

[33]  H. Gerke,et al.  Assessment of Chinese paddy-soil structure using X-ray computed tomography , 2008 .

[34]  M. Deurer,et al.  The impact of soil carbon management on soil macropore structure: a comparison of two apple orchard systems in New Zealand , 2009 .

[35]  R. Lal,et al.  Soil structure and management: a review , 2005 .

[36]  P. Delmas,et al.  Image processing-based study of soil porosity and its effect on water movement through Andosol intact columns , 2009 .

[37]  M. Pagliai,et al.  Soil structure and the effect of management practices , 2004 .

[38]  T. Ryan,et al.  Quantification and visualization of anisotropy in trabecular bone , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[39]  C. J. Gantzer,et al.  Using high-resolution computed tomography analysis to characterize soil-surface seals , 2008 .

[40]  A. Ringrose-Voase,et al.  The automatic recognition and measurement of soil pore types by image analysis and computer programs , 1984 .

[41]  M. Pagliai,et al.  Study of soil porosity with mercury porosimetry and image analysis on backscattered electron scanning images (BESI). Application to tilled “crusting soils” in Zimbabwe , 1993 .

[42]  R. Rocheleau,et al.  The Impact of SO2 on the Degradation of MEA Components in PEMFCs , 2010 .

[43]  K. Ritz,et al.  Investigating microbial micro-habitat structure using X-ray computed tomography , 2006 .

[44]  Roel Merckx,et al.  Spatial location of carbon decomposition in the soil pore system , 2004 .

[45]  J. Bouma,et al.  The Function of Different Types of Macropores During Saturated Flow through Four Swelling Soil Horizons1 , 1977 .

[46]  E. Perfect,et al.  Disruptive methods for assessing soil structure , 2002 .

[47]  F. J. Stevenson.  HUmus Chemistry Genesis, Composition, Reactions , 1982 .

[48]  John R. Nimmo,et al.  POROSITY AND PORE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION , 2013 .