A comprehensive life cycle analysis of cofiring algae in a coal power plant as a solution for achiev

Algae cofiring scenarios in a 360 MW coal power plant were studied utilizing an ecologically based hybrid life cycle assessment methodology. The impacts on the ecological system were calculated in terms of cumulative mass, energy, industrial exergy, and ecological exergy. The environmental performance metrics, including efficiency, loading, and renewability ratios were also quantified to assess the sustainability of cofiring scenarios from a holistic perspective. The analysis results revealed that cumulative mass and ecological exergy consumption were higher for algae cofiring compared to single coal firing due to high material and energy inputs for the algae cultivation. On the contrary, total energy and industrial exergy utilization were reduced with an increasing share of algae cofiring where algae is dried with solar energy. Additionally, natural gas dried algae cofiring scenarios had a lower renewability ratio in comparison with single coal firing. The results of this study are vital for the policy makers to decide on more environmentally friendly algae cofiring options by considering the potential impacts on ecological system.

[1]  M. Mann,et al.  A life cycle assessment of biomass cofiring in a coal-fired power plant , 2001 .

[2]  Jingjing Zhu.  Algal Greenhouse Gas Mitigation for Coal-Fired Flue Gas , 2010 .

[3]  Clark W. Bullard,et al.  Net energy analysis : handbook for combining process and input-output analysis , 1976 .

[4]  M. K. Mann,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-fired Power Production , 1999 .

[5]  Cassidee Shinn,et al.  Greenhouse gas inventory report , 2009 .

[6]  K. L Kadam,et al.  Environmental implications of power generation via coal-microalgae cofiring , 2002 .

[7]  D. Tillman.  Biomass cofiring: the technology, the experience, the combustion consequences , 2000 .

[8]  Arnaud Hélias,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Mark A. White,et al.  Environmental life cycle comparison of algae to other bioenergy feedstocks. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Expanding exergy analysis to account for ecosystem products and services. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  David A. Tillman,et al.  Cofiring benefits for coal and biomass , 2000 .

[12]  Man-Shi Low.  Material flow analysis of concrete in the United States , 2005 .

[13]  Helmut Rechberger,et al.  Practical handbook of material flow analysis , 2003 .

[14]  A. Demirbas,et al.  Sustainable cofiring of biomass with coal , 2003 .

[15]  B. Bakshi,et al.  Thermodynamic accounting of ecosystem contribution to economic sectors with application to 1992 U.S. economy. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Bhavik R. Bakshi,et al.  Industrial and ecological cumulative exergy consumption of the United States via the 1997 input–output benchmark model , 2007 .