A hybrid framework for registration of carotid ultrasound images combining iconic and geometric features

Stroke is the third major cause of death worldwide behind heart disease and cancer. Carotid atherosclerosis is the most frequent cause of ischemic stroke. Early diagnosis of carotid plaque and serial monitoring of its size with the help of imaging modalities can help to prevent the atherosclerotic complications. The main difficulty is inevitable variability of patient’s head positions during image acquisitions. The time series registration of carotid images helps to improve the monitoring, characterization, and quantification of the disease by suppressing the global movements of the patient. In this work, a novel hybrid registration technique has been proposed and evaluated for registration of carotid ultrasound images taken at different times. The proposed hybrid method bridges the gap between the feature-based and intensity-based registration methods. The feature-based iterative closest point algorithm is used to provide a coarse registration which is subsequently refined by the intensity-based algorithm. The proposed framework uses rigid transformation model coupled with mutual information (MI) similarity measure and Powell optimizer. For quantitative evaluation, different registration approaches have been compared using four error metrics: visual information fidelity, structural similarity index, correlation coefficient, and MI. Qualitative evaluation has also been done using the visual examination of the registered image pairs.

[1]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Characterization of Carotid Plaques on 3‐Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging by Registration With Multicontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  Pierre Hellier,et al.  Coupling dense and landmark-based approaches for nonrigid registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Matthew D. Robson,et al.  Multicontrast MRI registration of carotid arteries in atherosclerotic and normal subjects , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Anupama Gupta,et al.  Technology and research developments in carotid image registration , 2012, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[5]  R. Herzig,et al.  Comparison of ultrasonography, CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography in severe carotid stenoses , 2004, European journal of neurology.

[6]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[7]  D. Hill,et al.  Medical image registration , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  J. Halperin,et al.  2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guideline , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  John David Spence,et al.  A “Twisting and Bending” Model-Based Nonrigid Image Registration Technique for 3-D Ultrasound Carotid Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  V. Fuster,et al.  Clinical Imaging of the High-Risk or Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque , 2001, Circulation research.

[12]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Iconic feature based nonrigid registration: the PASHA algorithm , 2003, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[14]  David L Wilson,et al.  Three-Dimensional Volume Registration of Carotid MR Images. , 2005, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[15]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Registration of Free-Hand Ultrasound and MRI of Carotid Arteries through Combination of Point-Based and Intensity-Based Algorithms , 2012, WBIR.

[16]  Volker Rasche,et al.  Non-rigid registration for fusion of carotid vascular ultrasound and MRI volumetric datasets , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[18]  Gary Friday,et al.  2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  S B Sherriff,et al.  Image Registration for the Investigation of Atherosclerotic Plaque Movement , 1993, IPMI.

[20]  Gary Friday,et al.  2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease. , 2011, Stroke.

[21]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[22]  Ben Glocker,et al.  Simultaneous Geometric - Iconic Registration , 2010, MICCAI.

[23]  G. Tomaselli,et al.  Letter by Tomaselli and Holmes regarding article, "2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease". , 2012, Circulation.

[24]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Nonrigid registration of three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance images of the carotid arteries. , 2009, Medical physics.

[25]  A Fenster,et al.  Evaluation of voxel-based registration of 3-D power Doppler ultrasound and 3-D magnetic resonance angiographic images of carotid arteries. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[27]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.