Frequency domain connectivity identification: An application of partial directed coherence in fMRI

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become an important tool in Neuroscience due to its noninvasive and high spatial resolution properties compared to other methods like PET or EEG. Characterization of the neural connectivity has been the aim of several cognitive researches, as the interactions among cortical areas lie at the heart of many brain dysfunctions and mental disorders. Several methods like correlation analysis, structural equation modeling, and dynamic causal models have been proposed to quantify connectivity strength. An important concept related to connectivity modeling is Granger causality, which is one of the most popular definitions for the measure of directional dependence between time series. In this article, we propose the application of the partial directed coherence (PDC) for the connectivity analysis of multisubject fMRI data using multivariate bootstrap. PDC is a frequency domain counterpart of Granger causality and has become a very prominent tool in EEG studies. The achieved frequency decomposition of connectivity is useful in separating interactions from neural modules from those originating in scanner noise, breath, and heart beating. Real fMRI dataset of six subjects executing a language processing protocol was used for the analysis of connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Lexical memory search during N400: cortical couplings in auditory comprehension , 2004, Neuroreport.

[2]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  João Ricardo Sato,et al.  A method to produce evolving functional connectivity maps during the course of an fMRI experiment using wavelet-based time-varying Granger causality , 2006, NeuroImage.

[4]  P. McGuire,et al.  Neural correlates of the semantic processing of sentences: Effects of cloze probability in an event-related FMRI study , 2000, NeuroImage.

[5]  S C Williams,et al.  Generic brain activation mapping in functional magnetic resonance imaging: a nonparametric approach. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[7]  S. Ogawa.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast-dependent oxygenation , 1990 .

[8]  S. Scott,et al.  Functional Integration across Brain Regions Improves Speech Perception under Adverse Listening Conditions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  G. Barker,et al.  Study design in fMRI: Basic principles , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  Todd B. Parrish,et al.  Altered Effective Connectivity within the Language Network in Primary Progressive Aphasia , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Erika E. Fanselow,et al.  Thalamic bursting in rats during different awake behavioral states , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Lester Melie-García,et al.  Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Vincent Schmithorst,et al.  Age-related connectivity changes in fMRI data from children listening to stories , 2007, NeuroImage.

[14]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Computer Intensive Testing for the Influence Between Time Series , 2006 .

[16]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  Michael Eichler,et al.  A graphical approach for evaluating effective connectivity in neural systems , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Michael Eichler,et al.  Abstract Journal of Neuroscience Methods xxx (2005) xxx–xxx Testing for directed influences among neural signals using partial directed coherence , 2005 .

[19]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Measuring interregional functional connectivity using coherence and partial coherence analyses of fMRI data , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measures of Conditional Linear Dependence and Feedback between Time Series , 1984 .

[21]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  C. Granger.  Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[23]  Jos B. T. M. Roerdink,et al.  BOLD Noise Assumptions in fMRI , 2006, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[24]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[25]  S. J. Peltier,et al.  T2 * Dependence of Low Frequency Functional Connectivity , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  R. Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed influences between activated brain areas in a motor-response task using fMRI. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[27]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[28]  Koichi Sameshima,et al.  Using partial directed coherence to describe neuronal ensemble interactions , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[30]  G. C. Tiao,et al.  An introduction to multiple time series analysis. , 1993, Medical care.

[31]  Tohru Ozaki,et al.  Evaluating frequency-wise directed connectivity of BOLD signals applying relative power contribution with the linear multivariate time-series models , 2005, NeuroImage.

[32]  V. Haughton,et al.  Mapping functionally related regions of brain with functional connectivity MR imaging. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[33]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[35]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Coding of peripheral electrical stimulation frequency in thalamocortical pathways , 2005, Experimental Neurology.

[36]  Alois Schlögl,et al.  Analyzing event-related EEG data with multivariate autoregressive parameters. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[37]  Yuzo Hosoya.  Elimination of Third‐series Effect and Defining Partial Measures of Causality , 2001 .

[38]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Understanding Neural Interactions in Learning and Memory Using Functional Neuroimaging , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[39]  L.A. Baccald,et al.  Generalized Partial Directed Coherence , 2007, 2007 15th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing.

[40]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Undirected graphs of frequency-dependent functional connectivity in whole brain networks , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  João Ricardo Sato,et al.  Intervention Models in Functional Connectivity Identification Applied to fMRI , 2006, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.