Statistical Antenna Proximity Effect Modeling with Uncertainty Impedance Ellipses

User effects on portable antennas can decrease the global terminal performance, such as reducing the battery life or the wireless coverage. People presence will modify the input impedance, the far field radiation pattern, the radiation efficiency, and the near field. In this paper, we investigate the influence of the user on the input impedance by means of a new statistical approach which relies on uncertainty, where a handheld antenna works in two modes (data and talk) while people couple to the antenna. Studying some reflection coefficient measurements performed with a vector network analyzer (VNA), a standard framework based on uncertainty ellipses is developed. Finally, the method is applied to some antenna prototypes, showing its advantages and reliability to quantify and compare proximity effects.

[1]  Wenzhong Shi,et al.  Principles of Modeling Uncertainties in Spatial Data and Spatial Analyses , 2009 .

[2]  L.P. Ligthart,et al.  Analysis of Mobile Phone Antenna Impedance Variations With User Proximity , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[3]  B. Manimegalai,et al.  A Multifractal Cantor Antenna for Multiband Wireless Applications , 2009, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[4]  L. Warne,et al.  Statistical properties of linear antenna impedance in an electrically large cavity , 2003 .

[5]  R. Johnson Elliptical Error Statistics for Radiolocation Analysis , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  P. Garcia,et al.  An RF electronically controlled impedance tuning network design and its application to an antenna input impedance automatic matching system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[7]  Yahya Rahmat-Samii,et al.  EM interaction of handset antennas and a human in personal communications , 1995, Proc. IEEE.

[8]  Bing-Hao Zeng,et al.  CPW-Fed Circular Fractal Slot Antenna Design for Dual-Band Applications , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[9]  M Pelosi,et al.  Antenna Proximity Effects for Talk and Data Modes in Mobile Phones , 2010, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[10]  P. Ferrari,et al.  Complete Design and Measurement Methodology for a Tunable RF Impedance-Matching Network , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[11]  Pertti Vainikainen,et al.  Effect of the Human Body on Total Radiated Power and the 3-D Radiation Pattern of Mobile Handsets , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  Denise Schnelle,et al.  Evaluation of antenna and receiver mismatch effects on DTV reception , 2002, IEEE Trans. Broadcast..

[13]  L. Paradowski Uncertainty ellipses and their application to interval estimation of emitter position , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  I. Olkin,et al.  Multivariate Chebyshev Inequalities , 1960 .

[15]  Shuai Zhang,et al.  Statistical Investigation of the User Effects on Mobile Terminal Antennas for 5G Applications , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[16]  M. Stuchly,et al.  A study of the handset antenna and human body interaction , 1996 .

[17]  Bram Nauta,et al.  An Automatic Antenna Tuning System Using Only RF Signal Amplitudes , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[18]  Kin‐Lu Wong,et al.  A low-profile planar monopole antenna for multiband operation of mobile handsets , 2003 .

[19]  M. B. Knudsen,et al.  A Grip Study for Talk and Data Modes in Mobile Phones , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[20]  Andrew R. Webb,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1999 .

[21]  R. Valkonen,et al.  Effect of the User's Hands on the Operation of Lower UHF-Band Mobile Terminal Antennas: Focus on Digital Television Receiver , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[22]  Paloma Garcia Ducar,et al.  Performance degradation due to antenna impedance variability in DVB-H consumer devices , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.