Improving contact lens compliance by explaining the benefits of compliant procedures.

AIM To increase compliance with instructions for safe and successful contact lens wear by helping patients understand the advantages and consequences of compliant and non-compliant behavior respectively. METHODS A series of explanations which elucidate the practical and scientific basis for many of the instructions given at lens delivery and aftercare have been prepared as a means of extending patient education beyond simply being instructed on what to do. DISCUSSION The summary versions of these explanations have been prepared at an easier level of readability (age 10-12 years) to assist young patients and adults with reading disabilities, including those for whom English is their second language. CONCLUSIONS Patients may be non-compliant because they do not understand the practical and/or scientific basis for procedures and the potential consequences of aberrant behavior. Delay in the onset of symptoms associated with non-compliance may allow them to assume that compliance is not important. Explanations which describe why instructions given for lens use are consistent with sustained comfortable and safe lens wear, appear to have the potential to strengthen or change patient attitudes toward being compliant. Behavior modification which reduces the prevalence of non-compliance appears likely to also help sustain better contact lens performance and reduce the prevalence of contact lens failure. These explanations could be modified for use in different practices according to the preferences of individual practitioners and to include new research findings as they become available.

[1]  B. Weissman,et al.  Compliance with soft contact lens replacement schedules and associated contact lens-related ocular complications: the UCLA Contact Lens Study. , 2010, Optometry.

[2]  C. Giasson,et al.  Overwear of Contact Lenses: Increased Severity of Clinical Signs as a Function of Protein Adsorption , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  P. Asbell,et al.  A study of patient compliance in a contact lens-wearing population. , 1990, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[4]  J. V. van Horn,et al.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and slime excretion on antibiotic-loaded bone cement , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[5]  M. Wilkins,et al.  Impact of written and photographic instruction sheets on patient behavior after cataract surgery , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  P. P. Lee,et al.  Literacy levels of ophthalmic patient education materials. , 1997, Survey of ophthalmology.

[7]  P. Cho,et al.  Non-Compliance and Microbial Contamination in Orthokeratology , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[8]  Paul P. Lee,et al.  Health literacy and ophthalmic patient education. , 2010, Survey of ophthalmology.

[9]  B. Weissman,et al.  Prevalence of Contact Lens-Related Complications: UCLA Contact Lens Study , 2009, Eye & contact lens.

[10]  K. Dumbleton,et al.  Compliance with Contact Lens Replacement in Canada and the United States , 2010, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  C. Woods,et al.  Impact of a Rub and Rinse on Solution-Induced Corneal Staining , 2010, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  D. Newsham A randomised controlled trial of written information: the effect on parental non-concordance with occlusion therapy , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  R. Sanson-Fisher,et al.  The development of a checklist of content and design characteristics for printed health education materials , 1997 .

[14]  Pranab K Mukherjee,et al.  Increased Resistance of Contact Lens-Related Bacterial Biofilms to Antimicrobial Activity of Soft Contact Lens Care Solutions , 2009, Cornea.

[15]  L. Szczotka-Flynn,et al.  Risk Factors for Contact Lens Bacterial Contamination During Continuous Wear , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  F. Stapleton,et al.  Removal of biofilm from contact lens storage cases. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  F. Stapleton,et al.  Profile and Frequency of Microbial Contamination of Contact Lens Cases , 2010, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  L. Carney,et al.  Compliance with care and maintenance procedures amongst contact lens wearers , 1986 .

[19]  H. D. Cavanagh,et al.  Patient Compliance During Contact Lens Wear: Perceptions, Awareness, and Behavior , 2010, Eye & contact lens.

[20]  John M.B. Rumpakis,et al.  New data on contact lens dropouts: an international perspective: more than one in six of your contact lens patients will discontinue lens wear, a new study finds. That's a big chunk of your bottom line , 2010 .

[21]  P. Cho,et al.  Rivers and mountains may change, human nature does not! (traditional Chinese saying). , 2009, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.