Self-generated learning in people with multiple sclerosis: An extension of Chiaravalloti and DeLuca (2002)

Although memory impairment is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), few interventions have been tested to remediate forgetfulness in MS. Chiaravalloti and DeLuca (2002) examined the memory benefit of self-generated encoding over didactic presentation in people with MS and a control group. They found that self-generated encoding enhanced memory of MS patients and a control group alike. The present study extended this finding by examining self-generated encoding in memory-impaired MS patients as well. A control group and MS patients with and without memory impairment learned word-pairs that were either self-generated or didactically presented. All groups remembered more self-generated words than those that were read aloud, and severity of memory impairment failed to moderate this memory benefit. Implications of these findings for cognitive rehabilitation and the nature of memory impairment in MS are discussed.

[1]  J. DeLuca,et al.  Treating learning impairments improves memory performance in multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial , 2005, Multiple sclerosis.

[2]  C. Pozzilli,et al.  Computer-aided retraining of memory and attention in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial , 2004, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[3]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a review of recent developments. , 2003, Current opinion in neurology.

[4]  J. DeLuca,et al.  Can the repetition effect maximize learning in multiple sclerosis? , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[5]  J. DeLuca,et al.  Self-generation as a means of maximizing learning in multiple sclerosis: an application of the generation effect. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  B. Wilson Compensating for Cognitive Deficits Following Brain Injury , 2000, Neuropsychology Review.

[7]  I. Robertson,et al.  Rehabilitation of brain damage: brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Arthur MacNeill Horton,et al.  Wechsler Memory Scale III , 1999 .

[9]  D. Balota,et al.  Generation effects and source memory in healthy older adults and in adults with dementia of the Alzheimer type. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[10]  M. Viitanen,et al.  Effectiveness of self-generated cues in early Alzheimer's disease. , 1994, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[11]  B. Schefft,et al.  Mood-moderating effects of affect intensity on cognition: sometimes euphoria is not beneficial and dysphoria is not detrimental. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  D. J. Burns,et al.  The consequences of generation , 1992 .

[13]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. , 1991, Neurology.

[14]  I. Begg,et al.  The generation effect is no artifact: Generating makes words distinctive. , 1989 .

[15]  Z. Peynircioǧlu The generation effect with pictures and nonsense figures , 1989 .

[16]  Mary-Louise Kean,et al.  Memory for internally generated words in Alzheimer-type dementia: Breakdown in encoding and semantic memory , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  Norman J. Slamucka,et al.  The generation effect when generation fails , 1983 .

[18]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[19]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[20]  B. Wilson Rehabilitation and memory disorders. , 1992 .

[21]  F. Schmitt,et al.  The generation effect and reality monitoring: evidence from dementia and normal aging. , 1986, Journal of gerontology.

[22]  A. Sockloff,et al.  Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: (revised edition), by Jacob Cohen. New York: Academic Press, 1977, xv + 474 pp., $24.50. , 1978 .

[23]  W. L. Benedict,et al.  Multiple Sclerosis , 2007, Journal - Michigan State Medical Society.