Exploring the potential of mobile phone records and online route planners for dynamic accessibility analysis

Big Data sources offer new possibilities for urban mobility and accessibility studies. As people carry out their activities in a city, they leave behind a digital fingerprint that can be used to analyze the population’s daily mobility patterns and determine the exact times of travel between points of origin and destination at different times of the day. These data present high spatial and temporal resolution, and enable accurate and dynamic analysis of accessibility. The objective of this study was to conduct a dynamic analysis of urban accessibility considering its two main components: travel times and the attractiveness of destinations. To this end, we calculated travel times between transport zones using the Google Maps API and constructed origin and destination (OD) travel matrices from mobile phone records. Several scenarios were generated to analyze dynamic accessibility and the separate influence of its two components. We also conducted a cluster analysis to characterize transport zones according to their accessibility in each of the scenarios and times of day considered. Our results indicate that these new sources of geolocated data show considerable potential for use in time-sensitive accessibility studies, since they yield more accurate and realistic information than static or partially dynamic analyses. Such information could help politicians take better decisions concerning transport and land use.

[1]  José J. Ramasco,et al.  Exploring the potential of phone call data to characterize the relationship between social network and travel behavior , 2015 .

[2]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  Identifying public transport gaps using time-dependent accessibility levels , 2015 .

[3]  Marta C. González,et al.  Origin-destination trips by purpose and time of day inferred from mobile phone data , 2015 .

[4]  Pavlos S. Kanaroglou,et al.  Gridlock in the Greater Toronto Area: Its geography and intensity during key periods , 2015 .

[5]  Luigi dell’Olio,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Environmental Impacts and Accessibility on Real Estate Prices in Industrial Cities , 2014 .

[6]  Vytautas Grigonis,et al.  Application of Google-based Data for Travel Time Analysis: Kaunas City Case Study , 2017 .

[7]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  The role of accessibility in basic transportation choice behavior , 1976 .

[8]  Johan Wideberg,et al.  Deriving origin destination data from a mobile phone network , 2007 .

[9]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  Daily fluctuations in transit and job availability: A comparative assessment of time-sensitive accessibility measures , 2016 .

[10]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Understanding individual mobility patterns from urban sensing data: A mobile phone trace example , 2013 .

[11]  S. Farber,et al.  Temporal variability in transit-based accessibility to supermarkets , 2014 .

[12]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives , 1997 .

[13]  Pu Wang,et al.  Development of origin–destination matrices using mobile phone call data , 2014 .

[14]  Enrica Papa,et al.  Accessibility planning tools for sustainable and integrated land use/transport (LUT) development: an application to Rome , 2013 .

[15]  Xin Wang,et al.  Optimization of preventive health care facility locations , 2010, International journal of health geographics.

[16]  Javier Gutiérrez,et al.  The impact of orbital motorways on intra-metropolitan accessibility: the case of Madrid's M-40 , 1999 .

[17]  David M Levinson,et al.  Modeling the commute mode share of transit using continuous accessibility to jobs , 2015 .

[18]  John D. Nelson,et al.  Does Accessibility Planning address what matters? A review of current practice and practitioner perspectives , 2011 .

[19]  Marta C. González,et al.  The path most traveled: Travel demand estimation using big data resources , 2015, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[20]  Enrique Frías-Martínez,et al.  Cross-Checking Different Sources of Mobility Information , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  A. Páez,et al.  Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators , 2012 .

[22]  Hélène Charreire,et al.  Travel Time to Hospital for Childbirth: Comparing Calculated Versus Reported Travel Times in France , 2017, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[23]  Javier Gutiérrez,et al.  Dynamic Accessibility using Big Data: The Role of the Changing Conditions of Network Congestion and Destination Attractiveness , 2016, ArXiv.

[24]  Fahui Wang,et al.  Estimating O–D travel time matrix by Google Maps API: implementation, advantages, and implications , 2011, Ann. GIS.

[25]  Borja Moya-Gómez,et al.  Working with the daily variation in infrastructure performance on territorial accessibility. The cases of Madrid and Barcelona , 2015 .

[26]  A. El-geneidy,et al.  Toward Equitable Transit: Examining Transit Accessibilityand Social Need in Toronto, Canada, 1996-2006 , 2013 .

[27]  Lasse Møller-Jensen,et al.  Measuring accessibility and congestion in Accra , 2012 .

[28]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions , 2004 .

[29]  Handong Wang,et al.  Dynamic accessibility mapping using floating car data: a network-constrained density estimation approach , 2011 .

[30]  Steven Farber,et al.  Dynamic public transit accessibility using travel time cubes: Comparing the effects of infrastructure (dis)investments over time , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[31]  J. García-Palomares,et al.  The daily dynamic potential accessibility by car in London on Wednesdays , 2017 .