Ion exclusion by sub-2-nm carbon nanotube pores

Biological pores regulate the cellular traffic of a large variety of solutes, often with high selectivity and fast flow rates. These pores share several common structural features: the inner surface of the pore is frequently lined with hydrophobic residues, and the selectivity filter regions often contain charged functional groups. Hydrophobic, narrow-diameter carbon nanotubes can provide a simplified model of membrane channels by reproducing these critical features in a simpler and more robust platform. Previous studies demonstrated that carbon nanotube pores can support a water flux comparable to natural aquaporin channels. Here, we investigate ion transport through these pores using a sub-2-nm, aligned carbon nanotube membrane nanofluidic platform. To mimic the charged groups at the selectivity region, we introduce negatively charged groups at the opening of the carbon nanotubes by plasma treatment. Pressure-driven filtration experiments, coupled with capillary electrophoresis analysis of the permeate and feed, are used to quantify ion exclusion in these membranes as a function of solution ionic strength, pH, and ion valence. We show that carbon nanotube membranes exhibit significant ion exclusion that can be as high as 98% under certain conditions. Our results strongly support a Donnan-type rejection mechanism, dominated by electrostatic interactions between fixed membrane charges and mobile ions, whereas steric and hydrodynamic effects appear to be less important.

[1]  Mainak Majumder,et al.  Nanoscale hydrodynamics: Enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes , 2005, Nature.

[2]  W. Deen,et al.  Hindrance Factors for Diffusion and Convection in Pores , 2006 .

[3]  Andreas Engel,et al.  Structural determinants of water permeation through aquaporin-1 , 2000, Nature.

[4]  C. Grigoropoulos,et al.  Fast Mass Transport Through Sub-2-Nanometer Carbon Nanotubes , 2006, Science.

[5]  Sony Joseph,et al.  Why are carbon nanotubes fast transporters of water? , 2008, Nano letters.

[6]  W. Deen Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid‐filled pores , 1987 .

[7]  Charles M. Lieber,et al.  Force Titrations and Ionization State Sensitive Imaging of Functional Groups in Aqueous Solutions by Chemical Force Microscopy , 1997 .

[8]  O. Magnussen,et al.  In situ surface x-ray diffraction studies of homoepitaxial electrochemical growth on Au(100). , 2006, Physical review letters.

[9]  F. Ashcroft,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Potassium Channel KirBac1.1 in the Closed State , 2003, Science.

[10]  C. Sow,et al.  Tailoring wettability change on aligned and patterned carbon nanotube films for selective assembly. , 2007, Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

[11]  Oliver Beckstein,et al.  The influence of geometry, surface character, and flexibility on the permeation of ions and water through biological pores , 2004, Physical biology.

[12]  Ben Corry,et al.  Designing carbon nanotube membranes for efficient water desalination. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[13]  N. Aluru,et al.  Electrolytic Transport in Modified Carbon Nanotubes , 2003 .

[14]  Charles M. Lieber,et al.  Covalently functionalized nanotubes as nanometre- sized probes in chemistry and biology , 1998, Nature.

[15]  P. Brown,et al.  Factors affecting the separation of inorganic metal cations by capillary electrophoresis , 1992 .

[16]  G. Hummer,et al.  Ion transport through membrane-spanning nanopores studied by molecular dynamics simulations and continuum electrostatics calculations. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[17]  N. Aluru,et al.  Ion separation using a Y-junction carbon nanotube , 2005 .

[18]  Rodney Andrews,et al.  Aligned Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Membranes , 2004, Science.

[19]  L. Bachas,et al.  Carbon nanotube based biomimetic membranes: mimicking protein channels regulated by phosphorylation , 2007 .

[20]  P. Brown,et al.  Effect of electrolyte composition on the separation of inorganic metal cations by capillary ion electrophoresis , 1992 .

[21]  V. Verselis,et al.  The first extracellular loop domain is a major determinant of charge selectivity in connexin46 channels. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[22]  G. Hummer Water, proton, and ion transport: from nanotubes to proteins , 2007 .

[23]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration , 1998 .

[24]  Bong-Gyoon Han,et al.  Structural basis of water-specific transport through the AQP1 water channel , 2001, Nature.

[25]  Youxing Jiang,et al.  The open pore conformation of potassium channels , 2002, Nature.

[26]  N. Chopra,et al.  Bifunctional Carbon Nanotubes by Sidewall Protection , 2005 .

[27]  Charles M. Lieber,et al.  Covalently-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Probe Tips for Chemical Force Microscopy , 1998 .

[28]  F. G. Donnan,et al.  The Theory of Membrane Equilibria. , 1924 .

[29]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Relating Nanofiltration Membrane Performance to Membrane Charge (Electrokinetic) Characteristics , 2000 .

[30]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Osmotic water transport through carbon nanotube membranes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  B. Chait,et al.  The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. , 1998, Science.

[32]  N. Chopra,et al.  Reversible Biochemical Switching of Ionic Transport through Aligned Carbon Nanotube Membranes , 2005 .

[33]  E. R. Nightingale,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL THEORY OF ION SOLVATION. EFFECTIVE RADII OF HYDRATED IONS , 1959 .

[34]  R. Andrews,et al.  Voltage gated carbon nanotube membranes. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[35]  Shinji Saito,et al.  Mechanism of ion permeation in a model channel: Free energy surface and dynamics of K+ ion transport in an anion-doped carbon nanotube. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[36]  E. Sacher,et al.  Controlled chemical functionalization of multiwalled carbon nanotubes by kiloelectronvolt argon ion treatment and air exposure. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[37]  G. Hummer,et al.  Water conduction through the hydrophobic channel of a carbon nanotube , 2001, Nature.

[38]  Youxing Jiang,et al.  Crystal structure and mechanism of a calcium-gated potassium channel , 2002, Nature.

[39]  Pavel Strop,et al.  Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli MscS, a Voltage-Modulated and Mechanosensitive Channel , 2002, Science.

[40]  A. Berezhkovskii,et al.  Single-file transport of water molecules through a carbon nanotube. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[41]  C. Jameson,et al.  Ion permeation dynamics in carbon nanotubes. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[42]  V. Verselis,et al.  Single-channel SCAM Identifies Pore-lining Residues in the First Extracellular Loop and First Transmembrane Domains of Cx46 Hemichannels , 2003, The Journal of general physiology.

[43]  Frederick George Donnan,et al.  Theory of membrane equilibria and membrane potentials in the presence of non-dialysing electrolytes. A contribution to physical-chemical physiology , 1995 .

[44]  G. Hummer,et al.  Water-gated mechanism of proton translocation by cytochrome c oxidase. , 2003, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[45]  Kaihsu Tai,et al.  Not ions alone: barriers to ion permeation in nanopores and channels. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[46]  C. Lorenz,et al.  Salt permeation and exclusion in hydroxylated and functionalized silica pores. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[47]  M. Wikström,et al.  Proton translocation by bacteriorhodopsin and heme-copper oxidases. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[48]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Modelling the retention of ionic components for different nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[49]  Shuguang Zhang,et al.  Slow release of molecules in self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffold. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[50]  Mainak Majumder,et al.  Effect of tip functionalization on transport through vertically oriented carbon nanotube membranes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[51]  Y. Fujiyoshi,et al.  Structure and gating mechanism of the acetylcholine receptor pore , 2003, Nature.