Towards a two-body neuroscience

Recent work from our interdisciplinary research group has revealed the emergence of inter-brain synchronization across multiple frequency bands during social interaction.1 Our findings result from the close collaboration between experts who study neural dynamics and developmental psychology. The initial aim of the collaboration was to combine knowledge from these two fields in order to move from a classical one-brain neuroscience towards a novel two-body approach. A new technique called hyperscanning has made it possible to study the neural activity of two individuals simultaneously. However, this advanced methodology was not sufficient in itself. What remained to be found was a way to promote real-time reciprocal social interaction between two individuals during brain recording and analyze the neural and behavioral phenomenon from an inter-individual perspective. Approaches used in infancy research to study nonverbal communication and coordination, between a mother and her child for example, have so far been poorly applied to neuroimaging experiments. We thus adapted an ecological two-body experiment inspired by the use of spontaneous imitation in preverbal infants. Numerous methodological and theoretical problems had to be overcome, ranging from the choice of a common time-unit for behavioral and brain recordings to the creation of algorithms for data processing between distant brain regions in different brains. This article will discuss the underlying issues and perspectives involved in elucidating the pathway from individual to social theories of cognition.

[1]  P. Baudonniere,et al.  The Social Function of Reciprocal Imitation in 2-Year-Old Peers , 1982 .

[2]  J. Lachaux,et al.  From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology: Francisco Varela's exploration of the biophysics of being. , 2003, Biological research.

[3]  G. Tononi Consciousness as Integrated Information: a Provisional Manifesto , 2008, The Biological Bulletin.

[4]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997, Complex.

[5]  P. Fries A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  G. Edelman,et al.  A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  D. Perrett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.11 November 2004 Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective , 2022 .

[8]  R. Hari,et al.  Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. , 2009, Physiological reviews.

[9]  F. Varela,et al.  Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[11]  K. Koepsell,et al.  Oscillatory phase coupling coordinates anatomically dispersed functional cell assemblies , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  E. Husserl Grundlegende Untersuchungen zum phänomenologischen Ursprung der Räumlichkeit der Natur , 1940 .

[13]  Hanne De Jaegher Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. , 2009, Consciousness and cognition.

[14]  Line Garnero,et al.  Inter-Brain Synchronization during Social Interaction , 2010, PloS one.

[15]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[16]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[17]  Michel Le Van Quyen,et al.  Analysis of dynamic brain oscillations: methodological advances , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  A. Clark An embodied cognitive science? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Dimitrios Pantazis,et al.  Coherent neural representation of hand speed in humans revealed by MEG imaging , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Space and selective attention , 1994 .

[21]  E. Durkheim The Division of Labor in Society (1893) , 2000 .

[22]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  P. Latham,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S11 References Movie S1 Optimally Interacting Minds R�ports , 2022 .

[24]  Shu-Chen Li,et al.  Brains swinging in concert: cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Opstal Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[26]  Marc O. Ernst Decisions Made Better , 2010, Science.

[27]  L. Schilbach A second-person approach to other minds , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Sampsa Vanhatalo,et al.  Fine spatiotemporal structure of phase in human intracranial EEG , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  Micah Allen,et al.  Consciousness, Plasticity, and Connectomics: The Role of Intersubjectivity in Human Cognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[31]  D. Chalmers,et al.  The Hard Problem of Consciousness , 2007 .

[32]  Sylvia Weir,et al.  Action perception , 1974 .

[33]  T. Nagel Mortal Questions: What is it like to be a bat? , 2012 .

[34]  Olivier David,et al.  Waves of consciousness: ongoing cortical patterns during binocular rivalry , 2004, NeuroImage.