SRP: A concise non-parametric similarity-rank-based model for predicting drug-target interactions

The identification of drug-target interactions in web lab is costly and time-consuming. Computational approaches become important to help identifying potential candidates for laboratory experiments. However, they usually involve solving optimization problems or assuming statistical distribution based on prior knowledge, and may require estimating tunable parameters. This paper is motivated by the concepts behind “follow-on” drugs. They are the drugs developed by drug companies to substitute the pioneering drug which was firstly discovered and patented for a specific target and determined a new therapeutic class. There are three observations from “follow-on” drugs. The first observation has been used by many existing methods: drugs interacting with a common target usually have higher similar scores (e.g. the similarity score in terms of chemical structure). The second one is that a drug candidate for a specific target gains more attention if it is more similar to those drugs interacting with the target than other known drugs, even though the similarity score is low. Lastly, people intuitively tend to design a “follow-on” drug for the targets already having more drugs because of less cost and less risk. In our approach, the above observations are translated into more evidences for predicted drug-target interaction. Designing an interaction tendency index to characterize these observations, we propose the similarity-rank-based predictor (SRP). Unlike other models, SRP is a non-parametric model and requires neither solving an optimization problem nor prior statistical knowledge. Based on real benchmark datasets, we show that our model is able to achieve higher accuracy than the two most recent models and our approach is able to cope with two real predicting scenario of missing interactions.

[1]  Anh Duc Duong,et al.  Addressing cold-start problem in recommendation systems , 2008, ICUIMC '08.

[2]  Yoshihiro Yamanishi,et al.  Prediction of drug–target interaction networks from the integration of chemical and genomic spaces , 2008, ISMB.

[3]  Sanjay Joshua Swamidass,et al.  Mining small-molecule screens to repurpose drugs , 2011, Briefings Bioinform..

[4]  Andrew L. Hopkins,et al.  Drug discovery: Predicting promiscuity , 2009, Nature.

[5]  J. DiMasi,et al.  The economics of follow-on drug research and development: Trends in entry rates and the timing of development — The authors’ reply , 2005, PharmacoEconomics.

[6]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Drug—target network , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Tapio Pahikkala,et al.  Toward more realistic drug^target interaction predictions , 2014 .

[8]  Mark Goadrich,et al.  The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves , 2006, ICML.

[9]  P. Austin,et al.  How Many “Me-Too” Drugs are Enough? The Case of Physician Preferences for Specific Statins , 2006, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[10]  Competitive pricing within pharmaceutical classes: evidence on “follow-on” drugs in Germany 1993–2008 , 2013, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[11]  Chuang Liu,et al.  Prediction of Drug-Target Interactions and Drug Repositioning via Network-Based Inference , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Mehmet Gönen,et al.  Predicting drug-target interactions from chemical and genomic kernels using Bayesian matrix factorization , 2012, Bioinform..

[13]  Michal Brylinski,et al.  Calculating an optimal box size for ligand docking and virtual screening against experimental and predicted binding pockets , 2015, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[14]  Jian-Yu Shi,et al.  Predicting drug-target interaction for new drugs using enhanced similarity measures and super-target clustering. , 2015, Methods.

[15]  J. DiMasi,et al.  Competitiveness in follow-on drug R&D: a race or imitation? , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[16]  Elena Marchiori,et al.  Gaussian interaction profile kernels for predicting drug-target interaction , 2011, Bioinform..

[17]  Yoshihiro Yamanishi,et al.  Supervised prediction of drug–target interactions using bipartite local models , 2009, Bioinform..

[18]  E. Marchiori,et al.  Predicting Drug-Target Interactions for New Drug Compounds Using a Weighted Nearest Neighbor Profile , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  T. Ashburn,et al.  Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[20]  J. DiMasi,et al.  The economics of follow-on drug research and development , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.