Factors contributing to the collision cross section of polyatomic ions in the kilodalton to gigadalton range: application to ion mobility measurements.

The projected superposition approximation (PSA) method was used to theoretically evaluate the factors contributing to the cross section measured in ion mobility experiments and to study how the significance of these factors varies with ion size from diglycine to a 1 μm oil droplet. Thousands of PSA calculations for ∼400 different molecules in the temperature range from 80 to 700 K revealed that the molecular framework made up of atomic hard spheres is, as expected, a major component of the cross section. However, the ion-buffer gas interaction is almost equally important for very small peptides, and although its significance decreases with increasing ion size, interaction is still a factor for megadalton ions. An additional major factor is the ion shape: Fully convex ions drifting in a buffer gas have a minimal frictional resisting force, whereas the resisting force increases with degree of ion surface concaveness. This added resistance is small for peptides and larger for proteins and increases the ion mobility cross section from 0 to greater than 40%. The proteins with the highest degree of concaveness reach a shape-effected friction similar to, and sometimes larger than that of, macroscopic particles such as oil droplets. In summary, our results suggest that the transition from nanoparticle (with Lennard-Jones-like interaction with the buffer gas) to macroscopic particle (with hard sphere-like interaction) occurs at ∼1 GDa.

[1]  A. Shvartsburg,et al.  An exact hard-spheres scattering model for the mobilities of polyatomic ions , 1996 .

[2]  T. Wyttenbach,et al.  Structural stability from solution to the gas phase: native solution structure of ubiquitin survives analysis in a solvent-free ion mobility-mass spectrometry environment. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[3]  M. Bowers,et al.  A novel projection approximation algorithm for the fast and accurate computation of molecular collision cross sections (II). Model parameterization and definition of empirical shape factors for proteins , 2013 .

[4]  Brian C. Bohrer,et al.  Biomolecule analysis by ion mobility spectrometry. , 2008, Annual review of analytical chemistry.

[5]  Martin F. Jarrold,et al.  Structural Information from Ion Mobility Measurements: Effects of the Long-Range Potential , 1996 .

[6]  Gary A. Eiceman,et al.  Ion Mobility Spectrometry in Analytical Chemistry , 1990 .

[7]  Thomas Graf,et al.  The size of the proton , 2010, Nature.

[8]  T. Wyttenbach,et al.  Gas-Phase Conformations: The Ion Mobility/Ion Chromatography Method , 2003 .

[9]  L. Pease,et al.  Physical analysis of virus particles using electrospray differential mobility analysis. , 2012, Trends in biotechnology.

[10]  A. Heck,et al.  Interrogating viral capsid assembly with ion mobility-mass spectrometry. , 2011, Nature chemistry.

[11]  T. Wyttenbach,et al.  A novel projection approximation algorithm for the fast and accurate computation of molecular collision cross sections (I). Method , 2011 .

[12]  E. A. Mason,et al.  Tables of transport collision integrals for (n, 6, 4) ion-neutral potentials☆ , 1975 .

[13]  C. Robinson,et al.  Collision cross sections of proteins and their complexes: a calibration framework and database for gas-phase structural biology. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Koichi Tanaka,et al.  The origin of macromolecule ionization by laser irradiation (Nobel lecture). , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[15]  M. Bowers,et al.  A novel projection approximation algorithm for the fast and accurate computation of molecular collision cross sections (III): Application to supramolecular coordination-driven assemblies with complex shapes , 2012 .

[16]  T. Wyttenbach,et al.  Inclusion of a MALDI ion source in the ion chromatography technique: conformational information on polymer and biomolecular ions , 1995 .

[17]  M. Jarrold,et al.  Helices and Sheets in vacuo. , 2007, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[18]  P. Stockley,et al.  Determining the topology of virus assembly intermediates using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry. , 2010, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[19]  Michael T. Bowers,et al.  Gas-Phase Conformation of Biological Molecules: Bradykinin , 1996 .

[20]  John B Fenn,et al.  Electrospray wings for molecular elephants (Nobel lecture). , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[21]  Norman L. Allinger,et al.  Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. 1 , 1989 .

[22]  L. Viehland,et al.  Uniform Moment Theory for Charged Particle Motion in Gases , 2012, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[23]  T. Wyttenbach,et al.  Effect of the long-range potential on ion mobility measurements , 1997 .

[24]  Christopher J. Hogan,et al.  Tandem differential mobility analysis-mass spectrometry reveals partial gas-phase collapse of the GroEL complex. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[25]  M. Knudsen,et al.  Luftwiderstand gegen die langsame Bewegung kleiner Kugeln , 1911 .

[26]  H. Hill,et al.  Atmospheric pressure ion mobility spectrometry of protonated and sodiated peptides. , 1999, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[27]  Ad Bax,et al.  Validation of Protein Structure from Anisotropic Carbonyl Chemical Shifts in a Dilute Liquid Crystalline Phase , 1998 .

[28]  B. Ruotolo,et al.  Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Reveals Conformational Changes in Charge Reduced Multiprotein Complexes , 2011, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[29]  Ingo Sick On the RMS radius of the proton , 2003 .

[30]  Edward A. Mason,et al.  Transport Properties of Ions in Gases: MASON:TRANSPORT PROPERTIES O-BK , 2005 .

[31]  Ming-Teh Hsu,et al.  Structures of carbon cluster ions from 3 to 60 atoms: Linears to rings to fullerenes , 1991 .

[32]  Robert A. Millikan The General Law of Fall of a Small Spherical Body through a Gas, and its Bearing upon the Nature of Molecular Reflection from Surfaces , 1980 .

[33]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[34]  Brandon T Ruotolo,et al.  Ion mobility–mass spectrometry analysis of large protein complexes , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[35]  Christopher J. Hogan,et al.  Ion Mobility Measurements of Nondenatured 12–150 kDa Proteins and Protein Multimers by Tandem Differential Mobility Analysis–Mass Spectrometry (DMA-MS) , 2011, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[36]  T. Wyttenbach,et al.  Gas-Phase Conformations of Synthetic Polymers: Poly(ethylene glycol), Poly(propylene glycol), and Poly(tetramethylene glycol) , 2000 .

[37]  L. Guddat,et al.  The Crystal Structures of Klebsiella pneumoniae Acetolactate Synthase with Enzyme-bound Cofactor and with an Unusual Intermediate* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  T. Wyttenbach,et al.  Salt Bridge Structures in the Absence of Solvent? The Case for the Oligoglycines , 1998 .

[39]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .