Consciousness, Spirituality and Right Decision/Negotiation in Purposeful Complex Adaptive Systems

Both cybernetic and self-organizing, purposeful complex adaptive systems (PCAS) express purpose by solving problems defined by choosing and delivering values to participants as operational goals through decision making. Individuals, groups, organizations, and economies are PCAS. Here we focus on indviduals and groups. Evolutionary Systems Design (ESD) is a universal (culture independent) general problem solving, formal modeling/design framework for PCAS that can be computer implemented in same time/same place or telework modes. Formally, in ESD sets of elements and their relations modeling a PCAS evolve through cybernetics/self organization. Spirituality and the concept of right decision/negotiation in PCAS are discussed in relation to consciousness. Rightness comes from spirituality, i.e., consciousness experiencing oneness. Oneness is integrally bound with love; hence the term oneness/love. Through right decision/negotiation PCAS try to realize their ultimate purpose to live Two (the relative, the process of all there is) as One (the absolute, all there is). Oneness/love, connectedness to One, promotes problem solving and negotiation - expressed formally in the ESD problem representation - that is at the same time right. Simply put, right problem solving requires oneness/love and delivers oneness/love. Computer and receiver modes of consciousness are discussed in relation to oneness/love and its absence experienced as separateness/fear. Ways to transit from the latter to the former are considered. P.L. Yu's Habitual Domain (HD) framework is introduced and discussed in relation to ESD. Evolutionary heuristics for evolution of an ESD right problem representation through cybernetics/self-organization are presented based on combined HD and ESD concepts. Then operational procedures for defining and validating a right problem for an individual or group and associated right decision/negotiation outcome are considered. Thus, the work contributes to procedural rationality - how decisions should be or are made - in purposeful complex adaptive systems. The paper suggests that for humans to live fully (awake) is to live in our love-based spirituality, in the moment, consciousness experiencing oneness/love at the edge of chaos, challenged in our purpose to live Two as One by spiritual or right decision/negotiation through cybernetics/self-organization, i.e., problem solving under oneness. Artificial agents in PCAS may participate in right decision/negotiation. They may in principle have consciousness but the nature of the subjective experience is unclear.

[1]  Melvin F. Shakun,et al.  Defining a right problem in group decision and negotiation: Feeling and evolutionary generating procedures , 1992 .

[2]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Restructurable representations of negotiation , 1991 .

[3]  Melvin F. Shakun,et al.  Group decision and negotiation support in evolving, nonshared information contexts , 1990 .

[4]  M. F. Shakun.  Intercultural group decision and negotiation with ESD and computer support , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Information Intelligence and Systems (Cat. No.96CH35929).

[5]  Melvin F. Shakun,et al.  An ESD Computer Culture for Intercultural Problem Solving and Negotiation , 1999 .

[6]  Stan Matwin,et al.  Representing the negotiation process with a rule-based formalism , 1988 .

[7]  Melvin F. Shakun.  Restructuring a negotiation with evolutionary systems design , 1995 .

[8]  Melvin F. Shakun,et al.  Using a group support system to implement Evolutionary Systems Design , 1996 .

[9]  Katia Sycara,et al.  Negotiation planning: An AI approach , 1990 .

[10]  Rosalind W. Picard.  Affective Computing , 1997 .

[11]  R. Pascale.  Managing on the Edge , 1990 .

[12]  Alwyn C. Scott,et al.  Toward a science of consciousness: The first Tucson discussions and debates , 1996 .

[13]  Melvin F. Shakun,et al.  Modeling and supporting task-oriented group processes: Purposeful complex adaptive systems and Evolutionary Systems Design , 1996 .

[14]  K. Sycara.  Problem Restructuring in Negotiation , 1991 .

[15]  P. L. Yu,et al.  Habitual Domains , 1991, Oper. Res..

[16]  Tung Bui,et al.  Negotiation processes, Evolutionary Systems Design, and NEGOTIATOR , 1996 .

[17]  R. Stacey.  Complexity and Creativity in Organizations , 1996 .

[18]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Flow. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York (HarperPerennial) 1990. , 1990 .

[19]  Melvin F. Shakun,et al.  Airline Buyout: Evolutionary Systems Design and Problem Restructuring in Group Decision and Negotiation , 1991 .

[20]  Leopold A. Ziegler,et al.  Evolutionary Systems Design: Policy Making Under Complexity and Group Decision Support Systems , 1989 .

[21]  Melvin F. Shakun,et al.  Social-emotional aspects of negotiation , 1990 .

[22]  G. Jampolsky.  Love Is Letting Go of Fear , 1979 .

[23]  William L. Ury,et al.  Getting to Yes , 2019, Boy on the Bridge.

[24]  D. Chalmers.  The puzzle of conscious experience. , 1995, Scientific American.

[25]  Pema Chödrön.  When Things Fall Apart: Heart Advice for Difficult Times , 1996 .