Using Conceptests to Assess and Improve Student Conceptual Understanding in Introductory Geoscience Courses

Conceptests are higher-order multiple-choice questions that focus on one key concept of an instructor's major learning goals for a lesson. When coupled with student interaction through peer instruction, conceptests represent a rapid method of formative assessment of student understanding, require minimal changes to the instructional environment and introduce many of the recognized principles of effective teaching that enhance student learning. In this study, instructors from several different institutions developed over 300 conceptests for the geosciences. These instructors then used this suite of concept questions in a wide range of classroom settings, including large introductory general education Earth Science courses for non-majors at open enrollment institutions, smaller physical geology classes suitable for majors at private colleges, and in introductory geology laboratory settings. Results of pre- and post-class Geoscience Concept Inventory (GCI) testing and qualitative feedback from students and instructors showed that conceptests increased attendance, improved student satisfaction, and enhanced student achievement. Participating instructors found implementation of conceptests into their classes straightforward and required less than 30 minutes of preparation per class. The conceptest question database is available on-line for geoscience instructors.

[1]  C. Hansel.  Scientific Teaching , 1972, Nature.

[2]  H. G. Murray,et al.  Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness. , 1983 .

[3]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[4]  Herbert S. Lin,et al.  They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different: Stalking the Second Tier , 1991 .

[5]  M. D. Sorcinelli.  Research findings on the seven principles , 1991 .

[6]  Sheila Tobias,et al.  They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier , 1991 .

[7]  A. Astin,et al.  Undergraduate science education: the impact of different college environments on the educational pip , 1992 .

[8]  A Time of Trials and Tribulations , 1994, Science.

[9]  Michael W. Matier,et al.  Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions , 1994 .

[10]  A. Bykerk-Kauffman.  Using Cooperative Learning in College Geology Classes , 1995 .

[11]  Cooperative-Learning Activities in Large Entry-Level Geology Courses , 1995 .

[12]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[13]  C. Nelson,et al.  Student Diversity Requires Different Approaches To College Teaching, Even in Math and Science , 1996 .

[14]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Innovation in large lectures—teaching for active learning , 1997 .

[15]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[16]  Ranald Macdonald,et al.  The disjunction between lecturers' conceptions of teaching and their claimed educational practice , 1997 .

[17]  D. Sokoloff,et al.  Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment , 1997 .

[18]  Slide Observations – Promoting Active Learning, Landscape Appreciation, and Critical Thinking in Introductory Geology Courses , 1998 .

[19]  Use of Conceptests in a Large Lecture Course To Provide Active Student Involvement and Peer Teaching. , 1998 .

[20]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[21]  Jeffrey Kovac,et al.  Student Active Learning Methods in General Chemistry , 1999 .

[22]  Promoting and Evaluating Participation in High-Enrollment Undergraduate Courses , 1999 .

[23]  S P Rao,et al.  Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes. , 2000, Advances in physiology education.

[24]  Dean A. McManus,et al.  The Two Paradigms of Education and the Peer Review of Teaching , 2001 .

[25]  Scott Pilzer.  PEER INSTRUCTION IN PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS , 2001 .

[26]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[27]  Conceptual Teaching and Quantitative Problem Solving: Friends or Foes?. , 2001 .

[28]  E. Stokstad.  Reintroducing the Intro Course , 2001, Science.

[29]  Eugene Judson,et al.  Learning from Past and Present: Electronic Response Systems in College Lecture Halls , 2002 .

[30]  A. Cox,et al.  Enhanced student learning in the introductory physics laboratory , 2002 .

[31]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  Transforming the lecture-hall environment: The fully interactive physics lecture , 2002 .

[32]  David N. Steer,et al.  Assessment and Active Learning Strategies for Introductory Geology Courses , 2003 .

[33]  Lisa Greer,et al.  Real-Time Analysis of Student Comprehension: An Assessment of Electronic Student Response Technology in an Introductory Earth Science Course , 2004 .

[34]  David N. Steer,et al.  How Students Think: Implications for Learning in Introductory Geoscience Courses , 2005 .

[35]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment , 1997 .