Flying with the wind: scale dependency of speed and direction measurements in modelling wind support in avian flight

BackgroundUnderstanding how environmental conditions, especially wind, influence birds' flight speeds is a prerequisite for understanding many important aspects of bird flight, including optimal migration strategies, navigation, and compensation for wind drift. Recent developments in tracking technology and the increased availability of data on large-scale weather patterns have made it possible to use path annotation to link the location of animals to environmental conditions such as wind speed and direction. However, there are various measures available for describing not only wind conditions but also the bird's flight direction and ground speed, and it is unclear which is best for determining the amount of wind support (the length of the wind vector in a bird’s flight direction) and the influence of cross-winds (the length of the wind vector perpendicular to a bird’s direction) throughout a bird's journey.ResultsWe compared relationships between cross-wind, wind support and bird movements, using path annotation derived from two different global weather reanalysis datasets and three different measures of direction and speed calculation for 288 individuals of nine bird species. Wind was a strong predictor of bird ground speed, explaining 10-66% of the variance, depending on species. Models using data from different weather sources gave qualitatively similar results; however, determining flight direction and speed from successive locations, even at short (15 min intervals), was inferior to using instantaneous GPS-based measures of speed and direction. Use of successive location data significantly underestimated the birds' ground and airspeed, and also resulted in mistaken associations between cross-winds, wind support, and their interactive effects, in relation to the birds' onward flight.ConclusionsWind has strong effects on bird flight, and combining GPS technology with path annotation of weather variables allows us to quantify these effects for understanding flight behaviour. The potentially strong influence of scaling effects must be considered and implemented in developing sampling regimes and data analysis.

[1]  C. Pennycuick Fifteen testable predictions about bird flight , 1978 .

[2]  J. Larochelle,et al.  The metabolic cost of flight in unrestrained birds. , 1978, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  C. Ellington Limitations on Animal Flight Performance , 1991 .

[4]  T. Alerstam,et al.  Bird flight and optimal migration. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Anders Hedenström,et al.  Effects of Sidewinds on Optimal Flight Speed of Birds , 1994 .

[6]  Felix Liechti,et al.  Modelling Optimal Heading and Airspeed of Migrating Birds in Relation to Energy Expenditure and Wind Influence , 1995 .

[7]  C. Pennycuick,et al.  Wingbeat frequency and the body drag anomaly: wind-tunnel observations on a thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) and a teal (Anas crecca) , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[9]  J. M. V. Rayner,et al.  Flight performance, echolocation and foraging behaviour in pond bats, Myotis dasycneme (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). , 1997 .

[10]  C. Pennycuick,et al.  Actual and 'optimum' flight speeds: field data reassessed , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  B. Bruderer,et al.  The relevance of wind for optimal migration theory , 1998 .

[12]  Kevin Padian,et al.  The origin and early evolution of birds , 1998 .

[13]  A. Hedenström,et al.  Optimal stopover decisions under wind influence: the effects of correlated winds. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Martin Green Is wind drift in migrating barnacle and brent geese, Branta leucopsis and Branta bernicla, adaptive or non-adaptive? , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  M. Kanamitsu,et al.  NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2) , 2002 .

[16]  A. Biewener,et al.  Comparative power curves in bird flight , 2003, Nature.

[17]  C. Pennycuick,et al.  Burning the engine: a time‐marching computation of fat and protein consumption in a 5420‐km non‐stop flight by great knots, Calidris tenuirostris , 2003 .

[18]  T. Alerstam,et al.  Can vector summation describe the orientation system of juvenile ospreys and honey buzzards? - An analysis of ring recoveries and satellite tracking , 2003 .

[19]  A. Hedenström,et al.  Do Arctic waders use adaptive wind drift , 2004 .

[20]  P. Berthold,et al.  Satelliten-Telemetrie beim Weißstorch (Ciconia ciconia) auf dem Wegzug — eine Pilotstudie , 1992, Journal für Ornithologie.

[21]  Felix Liechti,et al.  Birds: blowin’ by the wind? , 2006, Journal of Ornithology.

[22]  S. Wood Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R , 2006 .

[23]  Thomas Alerstam,et al.  Flight Speeds among Bird Species: Allometric and Phylogenetic Effects , 2007, PLoS biology.

[24]  Alan Y. Chiang,et al.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction With R , 2007, Technometrics.

[25]  Willem Bouten,et al.  Analyzing the effect of wind on flight: pitfalls and solutions , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  D. Ellerby,et al.  The mechanical power requirements of avian flight , 2007, Biology Letters.

[27]  D. Winkler,et al.  Movement ecology of migration in turkey vultures , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Melissa S. Bowlin,et al.  Grand Challenges in Migration Biology , 2010, Integrative and comparative biology.

[29]  Willem Bouten,et al.  Can wind help explain seasonal differences in avian migration speed , 2010 .

[30]  Daniel P. Costa,et al.  Accuracy of ARGOS Locations of Pinnipeds at-Sea Estimated Using Fastloc GPS , 2010, PloS one.

[31]  E. V. van Loon,et al.  Understanding soaring bird migration through interactions and decisions at the individual level. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[33]  Ross Purves,et al.  How fast is a cow? Cross‐Scale Analysis of Movement Data , 2011, Trans. GIS.

[34]  Thomas Alerstam,et al.  Optimal bird migration revisited , 2011, Journal of Ornithology.

[35]  S. Tilak,et al.  The Movebank data model for animal tracking , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[36]  D. Winkler,et al.  Migration path annotation: cross-continental study of migration-flight response to environmental conditions. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  Melissa S. Bowlin,et al.  Technology on the Move: Recent and Forthcoming Innovations for Tracking Migratory Birds , 2011 .

[38]  Gil Bohrer,et al.  Estimating updraft velocity components over large spatial scales: contrasting migration strategies of golden eagles and turkey vultures. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[39]  Bart Kranstauber,et al.  Bias in estimating animal travel distance: the effect of sampling frequency , 2012 .

[40]  Somayeh Dodge,et al.  MoveBank Track Annotation Project : Linking Animal Movement Data with the Environment to Discover the Impact of Environmental Change in Animal migration , 2012 .

[41]  Willem Bouten,et al.  RNCEP: global weather and climate data at your fingertips , 2012 .

[42]  Willem Bouten,et al.  Quantifying flow-assistance and implications for movement research. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[43]  Willem Bouten,et al.  Wind selectivity and partial compensation for wind drift among nocturnally migrating passerines , 2012, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[44]  Jiawei Han,et al.  The environmental-data automated track annotation (Env-DATA) system: linking animal tracks with environmental data , 2013, Movement Ecology.

[45]  Claire M. Postlethwaite,et al.  Effects of Temporal Resolution on an Inferential Model of Animal Movement , 2013, PloS one.