Methodology of Hinterland Strategy Selection for Container Port Based on GE Matrix and Fuzzy TOPSIS

Hinterland strategy selection is used to determine a sound marketing plan and resource allocation for ports in their own hinterlands to compete for container traffic. There are three types of hinterland strategies that ports can employ: expansive strategy, maintenance strategy, and recovery strategy. The aim of this paper is to develop a decision-making methodology for container ports to establish a logical international container hinterland strategy under a fuzzy environment based on the business strength and industry attractiveness matrix (GE matrix) and fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), in which the vagueness and subjectivity are handled with linguistics variables parameterized by triangular fuzzy numbers. This methodology took the attractiveness of international container hinterland units and a port's relative strength in every hinterland unit as the main assessing dimension to select a hinterland strategy. A fuzzy TOPSIS approach was used to evaluate the attractiveness of every international container hinterland unit and a port's relative competition in every hinterland unit. Furthermore, the GE matrix was erected to determine the hinterland strategy for a container port in every hinterland unit. Finally, the approach was demonstrated using the case of Lianyungang Port, China, which involved 30 international container hinterland units and 27 evaluation criteria. The application of a practical case indicates that this approach can provide effective decision support for container ports to establish an international container hinterland strategy.

[1]  Celik Parkan,et al.  Decision-making and performance measurement models with applications to robot selection , 1999 .

[2]  Peter Rousseeuw,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Seaports , 2000 .

[3]  H. Meersman,et al.  Port competitiveness: an economic and legal analysis of the factors determining the competitiveness of seaports , 2002 .

[4]  Dong-Wook Song,et al.  Regional container port competition and co-operation: the case of Hong Kong and South China , 2002 .

[5]  Lang Yu,et al.  A FEW THEORIES PROBLEM OF THE INTEGRATION ON PORT-INNERLAND ECONOMY , 2005 .

[6]  Ke Liu,et al.  Allocation of empty containers between multi-ports , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  C. Bhat,et al.  Household Vehicle Type Holdings and Usage: An Application of the Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Model , 2006 .

[8]  Brian Hoyle,et al.  Inter-port competition in developing countries: an East African case study , 1995 .

[9]  Xu Yong-neng Study on the Methodology of the Strategy Selection for the Road Freight Enterprise to Develop Modern Logistics , 2005 .

[10]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[11]  Adib Kanafani,et al.  A disaggregate analysis of factors influencing port selection , 2001 .

[12]  Roger R. Stough,et al.  REGIONAL PORT DYNAMICS IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY: THE CASE OF KAOHSIUNG, TAIWAN , 1997 .

[13]  Roger R. Stough,et al.  (New York: Vintage) pp. 45--55 , 1997 .

[14]  Juan Manuel Campos Benítez,et al.  Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry , 2007 .

[15]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[16]  Lu Yong A Study of Evaluation on Competition Power for Main Container Transportation Harbors in China , 2002 .

[17]  R. Robinson Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm , 2002 .

[18]  Eddy Van de Voorde,et al.  A general introduction to port competition and management , 2002 .

[19]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Yang Jia Gravity model for partitioning port hinterlands based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation , 2002 .

[21]  W. Yap,et al.  Competition dynamics between container ports in East Asia , 2006 .

[22]  ChenChen-Tung Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000 .

[23]  Dong-Hyun Jee,et al.  A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory , 2000 .

[24]  Mohammad Izadikhah,et al.  Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[25]  C. Feng,et al.  Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios , 2000 .

[26]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  A note on group decision-making based on concepts of ideal and anti-ideal points in a fuzzy environment , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[27]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management , 2006 .

[28]  Su Ya-qin,et al.  A Study on the Application of Fuzzy Neural Network Method in Business Stratagy Selection , 2000 .

[29]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[30]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  B. Blanco,et al.  Competitive policies for commercial sea ports in the EU , 2004 .

[32]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[33]  B. Slack CONTAINERIZATION, INTER-PORT COMPETITION, AND PORT SELECTION , 1985 .

[34]  Dong Jie Locational Quotient Used in the Analyses of Port Hinterland , 2002 .