Machining is the most important part of the manufacturing processes. Machining deals with the process of removing material from a work piece in the form of chips. Machining is necessary where tight tolerances on dimensions and finishes are required. The common feature is the use of a cutting tool to form a chip that is removed from the work part, called Swarf. Every tool is subjected to wear in machining. The wear of the tool is gradual and reaches certain limit of life which is identified when the tool no longer produce the parts to required quality. There are various types of wear a single point cutting tool may be subjected to in turning. Of these, flank wear on the tool significantly affects surface roughness. The other types of tool wears are generally avoided by proper selection of tool material and cutting conditions. On-line surface roughness measurements gained significant importance in manufacturing systems to provide accurate machining. The Acoustic Emission (AE) analysis is one of the most promising techniques for on-line surface roughness monitoring. The AE signals are very sensitive to changes in cutting process conditions. The gradual flank wear of the tool in turning causes changes in AE signal parameters. In the present work investigations are carried for turning operation on mild steel material using HSS tool. The AE signals are measured by highly sensitive piezoelectric element; the on-line signals are suitably amplified using a high gain pre-amplifier. The amplified signals then recorded on to a computer and then analyzed using MAT LAB. A program is developed to measure AE signal parameters like Ring down count (RDC), Signal Rise Time and RMS voltage. The surface roughness is measured by roller ended linear variable probe, fitted and moved along with tool post on a CNC lathe machine. The linear movements of probe are converted in the form of continuous signals and are displayed on-line in the computer. The results thus plotted show a significant relation between Surface Roughness and AE signal parameters. The conclusions are made for predicting surface roughness by suggesting consistent values and ranges for on-line monitoring AE signal parameters.
[1]
Roberto Teti.
In-Process Monitoring of Cutting Conditions and Tool Wear Using Acoustic Emission
,
1989
.
[2]
Duncan P. Hand,et al.
Acoustic emission monitoring of tool wear during the face milling of steels and aluminium alloys using a fibre optic sensor. Part 1: Energy analysis
,
1997
.
[3]
Chen Ming,et al.
On-line tool breakage monitoring in turning
,
2003
.
[4]
Roberto Teti,et al.
Tool Wear Monitoring Through Acoustic Emission
,
1989
.
[5]
D. Leea,et al.
Precision manufacturing process monitoring with acoustic emission
,
2005
.
[6]
Elsayed A. Orady,et al.
Tool condition monitoring by acoustic analysis through a solid path
,
1995
.
[7]
Ming-Shong Lan,et al.
In-Process Detection of Tool Breakage in Milling
,
1986
.
[8]
David Dornfeld,et al.
Acoustic Emission Sensing of Tool Wear in Face Milling
,
1987
.
[9]
A. K. Balaji,et al.
Performance-based optimal selection of cutting conditions and cutting tools in multipass turning operations using genetic algorithms
,
2002
.