High-Throughput Quantification of Phenotype Heterogeneity Using Statistical Features

Statistical features are widely used in radiology for tumor heterogeneity assessment using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique. In this paper, feature selection based on decision tree is examined to determine the relevant subset of glioblastoma (GBM) phenotypes in the statistical domain. To discriminate between active tumor (vAT) and edema/invasion (vE) phenotype, we selected the significant features using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with p value < 0.01. Then, we implemented the decision tree to define the optimal subset features of phenotype classifier. Naïve Bayes (NB), support vector machine (SVM), and decision tree (DT) classifier were considered to evaluate the performance of the feature based scheme in terms of its capability to discriminate vAT from vE. Whole nine features were statistically significant to classify the vAT from vE with p value < 0.01. Feature selection based on decision tree showed the best performance by the comparative study using full feature set. The feature selected showed that the two features Kurtosis and Skewness achieved a highest range value of 58.33-75.00% accuracy classifier and 73.88-92.50% AUC. This study demonstrated the ability of statistical features to provide a quantitative, individualized measurement of glioblastoma patient and assess the phenotype progression.

[1]  Ahmad Chaddad,et al.  Automated Feature Extraction in Brain Tumor by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Gaussian Mixture Models , 2015, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[2]  Metin Nafi Gürcan,et al.  Classification of glioblastoma and metastasis for neuropathology intraoperative diagnosis: a multi-resolution textural approach to model the background , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[3]  E Le Rumeur,et al.  MRI texture analysis on texture test objects, normal brain and intracranial tumors. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  Vikas Singh,et al.  Texture analysis applied to second harmonic generation image data for ovarian cancer classification , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  Michael Weller,et al.  Changing paradigms--an update on the multidisciplinary management of malignant glioma. , 2006, The oncologist.

[6]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Data Mining with Decision Trees: Theory and Applications , 2015, Online Inf. Rev..

[7]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[8]  Rivka R. Colen,et al.  Statistical feature selection for enhanced detection of brain tumor , 2014, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[9]  C. Kruchko,et al.  The impact of the Benign Brain Tumor Cancer Registries Amendment Act (Public Law 107-260) on non-malignant brain and central nervous system tumor incidence trends. , 2013, Journal of registry management.

[10]  Ralf Klinkenberg,et al.  Data Classification: Algorithms and Applications , 2014 .

[11]  Olivier Clatz,et al.  Glioma Dynamics and Computational Models: A Review of Segmentation, Registration, and In Silico Growth Algorithms and their Clinical Applications , 2007 .

[12]  Abbas Dandache,et al.  Carcinoma cell identification via optical microscopy and shape feature analysis , 2013 .

[13]  Juha Öhman,et al.  Texture analysis of MR images of patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury , 2010, BMC Medical Imaging.

[14]  Alberto Maria Segre,et al.  Programs for Machine Learning , 1994 .

[15]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways , 2008, Nature.

[16]  Jonathan R. Young,et al.  Advances in MRI Assessment of Gliomas and Response to Anti-VEGF Therapy , 2011, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[17]  W. Philip Kegelmeyer Computer detection of stellate lesions in mammograms , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[18]  Roman M. Palenichka,et al.  Multiscale model-based feature extraction in structural texture images , 2006, J. Electronic Imaging.

[19]  Ahmad Chaddad,et al.  Quantitative texture analysis for Glioblastoma phenotypes discrimination , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT).

[20]  Ricardo Fraiman,et al.  An anova test for functional data , 2004, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[21]  Andreas Christmann,et al.  Support vector machines , 2008, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[22]  Ahmed Bouridane,et al.  Extracted haralick's texture features and morphological parameters from segmented multispectrale texture bio-images for classification of colon cancer cells , 2011 .

[23]  Andrew B Rosenkrantz,et al.  Histogram-based apparent diffusion coefficient analysis: an emerging tool for cervical cancer characterization? , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  N. McGranahan,et al.  The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution , 2013, Nature.

[25]  N. deSouza,et al.  Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.