AutoTag and AutoSnap: Standardized, semi-automatic capture of regions of interest from whole slide images

Tumor angiogenesis is measured by counting microvessels in tissue sections at high power magnification as a potential prognostic or predictive biomarker. Until now, regions of interest1 (ROIs) were selected by manual operations within a tumor by using a systematic uniform random sampling2 (SURS) approach. Although SURS is the most reliable sampling method, it implies a high workload. However, SURS can be semi-automated and in this way contribute to the development of a validated quantification method for microvessel counting in the clinical setting. Here, we report a method to use semi-automated SURS for microvessel counting: • Whole slide imaging with Pannoramic SCAN (3DHISTECH)• Computer-assisted sampling in Pannoramic Viewer (3DHISTECH) extended by two self-written AutoHotkey applications (AutoTag and AutoSnap)• The use of digital grids in Photoshop® and Bridge® (Adobe Systems) This rapid procedure allows traceability essential for high throughput protein analysis of immunohistochemically stained tissue.

[1]  H. J. G. GUNDERSEN,et al.  Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis , 1988, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[2]  S. Fox,et al.  Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumours: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. , 1996, European journal of cancer.

[3]  A. Harris,et al.  Histological quantitation of tumour angiogenesis , 2004, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[4]  Umit Topaloglu,et al.  Automatic identification of angiogenesis in double stained images of liver tissue , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[5]  M Gion,et al.  Second international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation of angiogenesis quantification in solid human tumours. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[6]  G. Mitchell,et al.  Visualisation and stereological assessment of blood and lymphatic vessels. , 2011, Histology and histopathology.

[7]  X. Sun,et al.  Clinical and biological significance of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in colorectal cancer. , 2009, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[8]  N. Weidner,et al.  Current pathologic methods for measuring intratumoral microvessel density within breast carcinoma and other solid tumors , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[9]  R. Haba,et al.  The clinical significance of lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer patients. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[10]  Alexander I. Wright,et al.  RandomSpot: A web-based tool for systematic random sampling of virtual slides , 2015, Journal of pathology informatics.

[11]  Marcial García-Rojo,et al.  TMA Vessel Segmentation Based on Color and Morphological Features: Application to Angiogenesis Research , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[12]  F. B. Sørensen,et al.  Angiogenesis in breast cancer: a comparative study of the observer variability of methods for determining microvessel density. , 1998, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.